Income Tax (Case Laws)

Income Tax (Case Laws)

Court Year Petitioner Law/Section Topic Case Law Citation/Ref. View
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2024 IN C.A. 815/2016: MEMBER (TAXES) BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE, ETC. V. QAISER ABBAS IN C.A. 816/2016: MEMBER (TAXES), BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE, ETC. V. SYED FAKHAR RIAZ IN C.A. 817/2016: MEMBER (TAXES), BOARD OF REVENUE PUJNAB, LAHORE, ETC. V. MUHAMMAD ARSHAD IN C.A. 818/2016: MEMBER (T
VS
QAISER ABBAS AND OTHERS
Punjab Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1997 (I of 1997) 3(1),3B,4(1)(4) Agriculture Income

Application of Section 3B of the Punjab Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1997 is based upon the agricultural income as declared by the assesse himself in his income tax return under the Ordinance. In this context, it is worthy to reiterate Section 3(1) of the Punjab Read More...


2019 PTD 826
(2019) 119 TAX 370
2019 PTCL 211
2019 SCMR 446
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, WITHHOLDING TAX ZONE, RTO, MULTAN
VS
MESSRS SHAH SONS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. INDUSTRIAL ESTATE MULTAN
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.161 Income Tax Rules, 2002, R.44(4) withholding tax/ Failure to pay tax collected or deducted.

Failure to pay tax collected or deducted----payment for goods, services and contracts----Scope----Case against taxpayer related to non-deduction/non-payment of withholding tax which surfaced violation of the provisions of Ss.153 & 161 of the ITO Read More...


2023 PTD 524
Sindh High Court 2023 NESTLE PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND OTHERS
VS
THE FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 148 collecting agent/ advance tax

Constitutional matter, decision of---Principle---Cardinal principle while exercising Constitutional jurisdiction is that courts should abstain from deciding a Constitutional question, if a case could be decided on other or narrower Read More...


2023 PTD 527
Sindh High Court 2023 NESTLE PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND OTHERS
VS
THE FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 148 Headings/Object, purpose and scope

Headings---Object, purpose and scope----Headings do not control meaning and do not define its scope---Headings may assist in interpretation of a section, if words appear to be doubtful, however, they cannot restrict plain words of the Read More...


2023 PTD 527
Lahore High Court 2023 PEPSI COLA INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LIMITED
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 147(7), 147(8), 161, 161(1B), 162, 162(2), 174(3) Tax due-Recovery /tax liability / paid/discharged

Constitutional petition-Tax due-Recovery--- Reconciliation--- Dispute was with regard to notice of recovery of tax due issued under S.161 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001--- Rational in S. 161 (1B) of ITO 2001, was that a tax liable to be Read More...


2023 PTD 541
Peshawar High Court 2023 MESSRS SOHAIL STEEL GL SHEET COMPANY THROUGH PROPRIETOR
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE AND REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 148, 159 Exemption/ raw material imported

Sales tax at import stage-Exemption from income tax-Petitioners were running their manufacturing units in erstwhile Provincially Administered Tribal Areas, who sought tax exemption over raw material imported by them---Clause No. 146 of Read More...


2023 PTD 556
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 MESSRS EMIRATES SUPPLY CHAIN SERVICES (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, CRTO, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 131 annulled

Appeal to the Appellate Tribunal---Stay of proceedings--- Scope-Appellant/assessee sought stay of proceedings in consequence of an order passed by Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals)--- --Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) had annulled the order of the Read More...


2023 PTD 567
Islamabad High Court 2023 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
MESSRS ISLAMABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED, ISLAMABAD (IESCO)
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133, 161, 174 production of tax records/ Failure to pay tax collected or deducted

Tax demand-Record, maintenance of--Limitation- Failure to pay tax collected or deducted-Authorities issued notice for recovery of tax for the period beyond six years---Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue set aside the demand created by tax Read More...


2023 PTD 569
Islamabad High Court 2023 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, ISLAMABAD and others
VS
HAMEEDA BEGUM and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 136 Assessment---Oral gift

Assessment---Oral gift-Non-registration of gift declaration--Authorities were aggrieved of accepting unregistered oral gift of immovable property held by assessee---Gift deed executed under Transfer of Property Act, 1882, was required to be registered compulsorily Read More...


2023 PTD 603
Sindh High Court 2023 SHELL PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH LEGAL COUNSEL AND OTHERS
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Constitution of Pakistan Super tax/ vires of--charging section

Super tax, vires of--Charging section-Retrospective effect Property rights-Petitioners / taxpayers sought striking down of S.4B of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, on the plea that charging section could not be retrospective in Read More...


2023 PTD 607
Sindh High Court 2023 SHELL PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH LEGAL COUNSEL AND OTHERS
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Constitution of Pakistan Interpretation of statutes/ Amendment/ Inconsistency/ Taxing statute

Amendment-Inconsistency--Scope-Law accepts that amendment becomes a part of original statute and both ought to be construed together-In case of any inconsistency, harmonization may be employed so as to impede an irreconcilable Read More...


2023 PTD 607
Sindh High Court 2023 SHELL PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH LEGAL COUNSEL AND OTHERS
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Constitution of Pakistan Discrimination-Reasonable classification

Discrimination-Reasonable classification, principle of Scope-Provision of Art. 25 of the Constitution envisages equality between citizens, however it allows for differential treatment of persons not similarly placed under a reasonable Read More...


2023 PTD 607
Sindh High Court 2023 MESSRS ZAM ZAM LPG (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH ATTORNEY
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN REVENUE DIVISION AND 3 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 25, 177 Audit/ Selection of case for audit

Selection of case for audit-Word reasons - Scope--Petitioner taxpayer was aggrieved of letter and notices issued by authorities selecting its case for audit----Word reason connotes an expression giving justification for an action, a ground to explain something, a Read More...


2023 PTD 649
Sindh High Court 2023 MESSRS ZAM ZAM LPG (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH ATTORNEY
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN REVENUE DIVISION AND 3 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 25, 177 release of vehicle/ forensic report

Reference---Redemption fine---Release of vehicle-- Tampered chasis number---Authorities were aggrieved of release of vehicle which was confiscated for smuggling of petrol---Customs Appellate Tribunal released the vehicle on deposit of 20% redemption fine---Vehicle Read More...


2023 PTD 649
Sindh High Court 2023 MESSRS ZAM ZAM LPG (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH ATTORNEY
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN REVENUE DIVISION AND 3 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.18, 79(1)(e), 122(4) (5A), 133 & 166(1)(a) housing scheme

Tax exemption-Adventure in nature of trade---Scope---Taxpayer was an industrial unit and sold its land by converting it into a housing scheme and earned profit----For an adventure in nature of trade there had to be "indicia of trade" Read More...


2023 PTD 689
Lahore High Court 2023 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, LAHORE
VS
M/S MARWAT ENTERPRISES PVT. LIMITED, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 161,161(1B), 162, 162(2) advance tax

Scope-Purpose of advance tax is collection of tax in advance and its adjustment at later stage but not charging or levy of tax-For collection of advance tax, certain persons are obliged, by the Statute, to collect and deposit the same in Read More...


2023 PTD 732
2023 PTCL 85
Lahore High Court 2023 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, LAHORE
VS
M/S MARWAT ENTERPRISES PVT. LIMITED, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 161,161(1B), 162, 162(2) imposition and recovery default surcharge

Advance tax---Failure to pay tax deducted or collected---Default surcharge, recovery of-Scope-Provisions of S.162(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 regarding imposition and recovery of default surcharge etc. are only attracted where failure to deduct tax is Read More...


2023 PTD 732
2023 PTCL 85
Lahore High Court 2023 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, LAHORE
VS
M/S MARWAT ENTERPRISES PVT. LIMITED, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 161,161(1B), 162, 162(2) Annual statement of tax collected or deducted

Advance tax-Annual statement of tax collected or deducted-Scope--Practice of calling reconciliation, in absence of any statement, is against the spirit of R.44 of the Income Tax Rules, 2002-Rule 44 envisages, unequivocally, that Read More...


2023 PTD 732
2023 PTCL 85
Lahore High Court 2023 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, LAHORE
VS
M/S MARWAT ENTERPRISES PVT. LIMITED, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 161,161(1B), 162, 162(2) Show-cause notice/Principles and pre- requisites for issuing a show notice

Advance tax---Failure to pay tax deducted or collected---Default surcharge, recovery of-Show-cause notice, issuance of---Principles and pre- requisites for issuing a show notice under Ss. 161 & 162 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Read More...


2023 PTD 732
2023 PTCL 85
Lahore High Court 2023 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, RTO, GUJRANWALA
VS
MESSRS CRYSTAL DISTRIBUTORS, GUJRANWALA
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1)(b), 111(1)(d), 122(1), 128(5), 129, 129(1)(a), 132, 132(3)(c), 133, 133(5) Remanding of the matter

Reference--Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue---Powers---Remanding of the matter---Object, purpose and scope-Taxpayer assailed assessment order and Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) remanded the matter to Assessing Officer for de novo Read More...


2023 PTD 758
Sindh High Court 2023 COMMISSIONER (LEGAL DIVISION)
VS
PAKISTAN SERVICES LIMITED
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 62, 111, 111(2)(b) Penalty for concealment of income

Assessment on production of accounts, evidence, etc. Penalty for concealment of income---Scope---During the assessment proceedings, the taxation officer alleged that certain expenses claimed by the respondent were false and inaccurate Read More...


2023 PTD 773
Sindh High Court 2023 COMMISSIONER (LEGAL DIVISION)
VS
PAKISTAN SERVICES LIMITED
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 62, 111, 111(2)(b) Penalty for concealment of income

Penalty for concealment of income--Scope----Mens rea-----Scope----Existence of mens rea is a mandatory condition for levying any penalty under S.111 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Burden to prove such act of an assessee is also on Read More...


2023 PTD 773
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO-II, FAISALABAD
VS
MESSRS CRESCENT TEXTILE MILLS, LTD., FAISALABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 124, 221 Rectification/ incorrect assessment

Assessment giving effect to an order---Rectification of mistakes--Scope---According to S.124 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the assessing officer must adhere to the directions given in the appeal effect order and cannot make any Read More...


2023 PTD 789
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO-II, FAISALABAD
VS
MESSRS CRESCENT TEXTILE MILLS, LTD., FAISALABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 124, 221 Rectification of mistake

Rectification of mistakes-Scope of rectification is limited to correcting mistakes that are easily identifiable on the surface of the order. 
Scope---Section 221 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, is circumscribed to rectifying Read More...


2023 PTD 789
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2023 SNAMPROGETTI ENGINEERING B.V. through Special Attorney
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, L.T.U, ISLAMABAD and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 107, 107(2)(c), 122(5A), 122(9) International tax conventions, agreements or treaties

International tax conventions, agreements or treaties-----Interpretation----Reasons as to why treaty interpretation rules differ from domestic tax rules stated.

International tax conventions or Read More...


2023 PTD 863
2023 PTCL 722
2023 SCMR 1055
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2023 SNAMPROGETTI ENGINEERING B.V. through Special Attorney
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, L.T.U, ISLAMABAD and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 107, 107(2)(c), 122(5A), 122(9) Conventions/ Exemption/ permanent establishment

Convention between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income ("Convention"), Arts. 5 & Read More...


2023 PTD 863
2023 PTCL 722
2023 SCMR 1055
Islamabad High Court 2023 FAIRDEAL EXCHANGE COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTOR OF COMPANY
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 3 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 20, 122(9), 171(1), 177(7), 214C Audit Selection Regime

Constitutional petition-Audit Selection Regime--Petitioners / taxpayers were aggrieved of selection of their cases for Audit----Selection for audit under S. 177(1) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, by Commissioner Inland Revenue was not Read More...


2023 PTD 919
Sindh High Court 2023 MUMTAZ ALI RAJPAR AND BROTHERS THROUGH MANAGING PARTNER AND OTHERS
VS
PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY MINES AND MINERALS DEVELOPMENT AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 161, 161(2), 236(A) Royalty/ Failure to pay tax collected

Advance tax at the time of sale by auction---Royalty collection---Contractual liability---Petitioner were engaged in carrying out Read More...


2023 PTD 39
2023 PTCL 329
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-X, RTO-III, LAHORE
VS
MUHAMMAD IQBAL, PROP. BRIGHT STAR ENGINEERING WORKS, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1)(d), 170, 122 Refund/ Unexplained income or assets

Unexplained income or assets---Scope---Assessing authority while observing difference between the purchases declared in the Read More...


2023 PTD 96
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 NAEEM RAFIQUE BHATTI, GUJRANWALA
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(22A), 113, First Schedule Minimum tax/ Distributor/ Certificates

Question before Appellate Tribunal was whether the statues of taxpayer was of a Read More...


2023 PTD 134
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 NAEEM RAFIQUE BHATTI, GUJRANWALA
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(22A), 113, First Schedule Fast moving consumer goods

Minimum tax----Distributor---Fast moving consumer goods----Scope----Question before Read More...


2023 PTD 134
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 NAEEM RAFIQUE BHATTI, GUJRANWALA
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(22A), 113, First Schedule Fast moving consumer goods

First moving consumer goods---Scope----Definition of fast moving consumer goods reflects Read More...


2023 PTD 134
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 NAEEM RAFIQUE BHATTI, GUJRANWALA
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(22A), 113, First Schedule Decisions of Supreme Court

Decisions of Supreme Court binding on other Courts---Decision of High Court binding on Read More...


2023 PTD 134
Lahore High Court 2023 MUBASHIR YAMEEN
VS
ASSISTANT/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, RAWALPINDI AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122(1), 137(2), 138, 140 Attachment / recovery of tax amount

Recovery of tax out of property and through arrest of taxpayer---Recovery of tax from persons holding Read More...


2023 PTD 146
2023 PTCL 423
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2023 MUHAMMAD TAHIR
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, ABBOTTABAD AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 170 Tribal Area/President Order prior to levy tax

Resident of a Provincially Administered Tribal Area adjoining Mansehra District (the 'said tribal area')-Income tax refund, claim Read More...


2023 PTD 163
2023 PTCL 396
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 M. SARWAR SONS, HAFIZABAD
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1)(b), 121, 122 Unexplained income or assets/ separate notice

Non-issuance of separate notice-Effect-Appellant was aggrieved of certain additions made by assessing officer in his income under Read More...


2023 PTD 167
Lahore High Court 2023 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
M/S LAHORE RUBBER STORE
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 47(5), 57 Rectification / ex-parte order

Taxpayer was a retailer who was treated as manufacturer for the purposes of taxation--- Taxpayer sought rectification of ex-parte Read More...


2023 PTD 182
2023 PTCL 555
Sindh High Court 2023 RELIANCE PETROCHEM INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN, FBR AND 3 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 65D, 120, 122, 122(5A), 122(9), 177 Amendment of assessment/ Seeking information from assessee

Amendment of assessment---Seeking information from assessee-Scope-In case, if Assessing Authority comes across any information or Read More...


2023 PTD 186
Sindh High Court 2023 RELIANCE PETROCHEM INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN, FBR AND 3 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 65D, 120, 122, 122(5A), 122(9), 177 Amendment of assessment/ show-cause notice

Amendment of assessment---Opinion already formed Scope---Taxpayer company was aggrieved of show-cause notice issued by Read More...


2023 PTD 186
Lahore High Court 2023 RAO TARIQ ISLAM, ETC.
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, ETC.
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (XLIX OF 2001) 236D Tax, imposition

Object, purpose and scope---Tax cannot be expropriatory or confiscatory, which takes away a citizen's property without Read More...


2023 PTD 223
(2023)127 TAX 363
2023 PTCL 40
Lahore High Court 2023 RAO TARIQ ISLAM, ETC.
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, ETC.
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (XLIX OF 2001) 236D advance income tax &un-adjustable advance income tax

Tax, imposition of Amendment, vires of---Petitioners assailed amendment in S.236D of ITO 2001, fixing Rs.20,000 - as minimum slab for advance income tax to be collected of a person receiving services of or holding arranging functions in Read More...


2023 PTD 223
(2023)127 TAX 363
2023 PTCL 40
Lahore High Court 2023 SYNTHETIC PRODUCTS ENTERPRISES LIMITED AND OTHERS
VS
FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ETC.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120(2A), 122, 122(1), 122(5), 122(5A), 138(1), 168(2), 168(5), 170(3), 170(3)(a) adjustment of Workers Welfare Fund (WWF) / deemed assessment /adjustments of incorrect claim

Recovery---Refund, determining of-System generated notice, non-issuance of---Dispute was with regard to adjustment of Workers Read More...


2023 PTD 252
(2023)127 TAX 233
2023 PTCL 482
Lahore High Court 2023 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE
VS
MESSRS TASNEEM AKHTAR
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 122(6A), 133 Agriculture income / past and closed transaction

Agriculture income---Late payment-Penalty, imposing of-Principle-Authorities sought recovery of tax under S.111 of Income Tax Read More...


2023 PTD 312
2023 PTCL 543
Islamabad High Court 2023 M/S ASKARI BANK LIMITED
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 49, 161(1A), 205 Exemption from deduction of withholding tax

Show- cause notice, assailing of---Exemption from deduction of withholding tax---Failure to pay tax, collected or Read More...


2023 PTD 316
(2022)126 TAX 452
2023 PTCL 53
Islamabad High Court 2023 MESSRS ARMY WELFARE TRUST, RAWALPINDI
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.2(29), 9, 10, 11, 80(2)(b)(v), 133 & Second Sched., Part-1, Cl.58(2)(1) Income of trust / Tax exemption

Overriding title-Applicant/Trust sought exemption on the plea that its income was  diverted by virtue of overriding title of Read More...


2023 PTD 351
Islamabad High Court 2023 MESSRS ARMY WELFARE TRUST, RAWALPINDI
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.2(29), 9, 10, 11, 80(2)(b)(v), 133 & Second Sched., Part-1, Cl.58(2)(1) Income of trust / Tax exemption

Cooperative Society---Status---Society is a juristic person and body incorporated and formed under Read More...


2023 PTD 351
Islamabad High Court 2023 MESSRS ARMY WELFARE TRUST, RAWALPINDI
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.2(29), 9, 10, 11, 80(2)(b)(v), 133 & Second Sched., Part-1, Cl.58(2)(1) Welfare activities/onus on taxpayer

In relation to “income from business as is expended in Pakistan for Read More...


2023 PTD 351
Islamabad High Court 2023 MESSRS ARMY WELFARE TRUST, RAWALPINDI
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.2(29), 9, 10, 11, 80(2)(b)(v), 133 & Second Sched., Part-1, Cl.58(2)(1) Profit margin/ determination/ Taxation officer, discretion

Profit margin----Determination-----Taxation officer, discretion of----Scope----Taxation officer has no discretion to determine in Read More...


2023 PTD 351
Islamabad High Court 2023 MESSRS ARMY WELFARE TRUST, RAWALPINDI
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.2(29), 9, 10, 11, 80(2)(b)(v), 133 & Second Sched., Part-1, Cl.58(2)(1) Bad debts

Pre-condition----For purpose of any tax year in relation to which either Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 or Read More...


2023 PTD 351
Islamabad High Court 2023 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-II) LTU, ISLAMABAD
VS
MESSRS INTERNATIONAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION PAKISTAN LTD.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 221 Rectification of mistakes

Commissioner issued an exemption for the purposes of S. 152(5-A) allowing the respondent to make certain payments to a foreign Read More...


2023 PTD 390
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, LAHORE
VS
Messrs PAKISTAN WAPDA FOUNDATION, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133, 221 Rectification of mistakes

Rectification of mistakes--Doctrine of election-Scope---Against the order of the Appellate Tribunal, Read More...


2023 PTD 424
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2023 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, (RTO) Lahore
VS
MIAN LIAQAT ALI PROPRIETOR, LIAQAT HOSPITAL, Lahore
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 39, 111, 111(1)(d), 122, 122(5), 122(8), 122(9) Concealment of income

Concealment of business income from sales-Amendment of deemed assessment Read More...


2023 PTD 435
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 35, 111, 111(1)(b), 111(1)(c), 122, 129, 129(1), 129(1)(a), 129(1)(b) Annexure "F" of ST return (carry forward summary) /closing stock

Unexplained income or assets-Stock-in-trade vis-à-vis Annex "F" of sales tax return (carry forward summary)--Scope--- Read More...


2023 PTD 467
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 35, 111, 111(1)(b), 111(1)(c), 122, 129, 129(1), 129(1)(a), 129(1)(b) Power of Commissioner (Appeals)

Language of S.129(1)(a) only empowers the Commissioner (Appeals) to confirm, modify or annul the Read More...


2023 PTD 467
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 35, 111, 111(1)(b), 111(1)(c), 122, 129, 129(1), 129(1)(a), 129(1)(b) modify or annul

Decision in appeal---Remand--Scope---Where matter in issue is an assessment order then resort can Read More...


2023 PTD 467
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 35, 111, 111(1)(b), 111(1)(c), 122, 129, 129(1), 129(1)(a), 129(1)(b) Remand

Decision in appeal-Remand-Scope--Order passed under S. 122 creating liability is an assessment order for all intents and purposes and can only be dealt under Cl. (a) of S. 129(1) and binds the Read More...


2023 PTD 467
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122, 111 Unexplained income or assets / Stock-in-trade

Unexplained income or assets---Stock-in-trade--- Purchasing excess stock; an investment or expenditure---Scope---If any difference of declared stock is found or is effectively unearthed through audit or otherwise, it cannot be added as Read More...


2023 PTD 467
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122, 111 & 35 Sales Tax Rules, 2006 R. 14 Stock-in-trade

Stock-in-trade---Meaning-Stock-in-trade means anything produced, manufactured, purchased or otherwise acquired for manufacture, sale or exchange, and any material or supplies to be consumed in the production or manufacturing process, but does not include stocks and Read More...


2023 PTD 467
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122, 111 & 35 Interpretation

Strict rule of interpretation-Scope-Strict rule of interpretation mandates that plain, clear and direct meaning is given to words Read More...


2023 PTD 467
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 MESSRS SUPER VICTORIA STORE, LAHORE
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE WHT, RTO, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance 161, Withholding/tax demand

Dept., on taxpayer's failure to deduct withholding tax, created a certain tax demand---Appeal against such demand was dismissed---Officer Inland Revenue had failed to appreciate S. 161 of ITO 2001, in its true perspective-Since all the Read More...


2023 PTD 179
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE
VS
MESSRS DESCON ENGINEERING LIMITED, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120, 122, 122(1), 133, 177 natural justice

Principle of natural justice---Order in writing---Requirements---Order in writing must fulfill requirements of a speaking decision / order----Essential that party against whom such order is being passed must be given a proper notice confronting relevant material and Read More...


2023 PTD 492
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE
VS
MESSRS DESCON ENGINEERING LIMITED, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122--WWFO, 1971 S.4---W.W.F. no written order | principles of natural justice

Written order absence of----Authorities raised demand of tax on the amount payable to Fund on the ground that no written order was passed under S.4 of Worker’ Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971----Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue set Read More...


2023 PTD 492
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, ISLAMABAD
VS
Messrs WI-TRIBE PAKISTAN LIMITED, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 161, 153 & 152 Payments for goods, services and contracts

Payments to non-residents----Payments for goods, services and contracts---Scope----Taxpayer was imposed upon a liability for its failure to deduct tax at the time of making payment under Ss. 152 & 153 of Income Tax Ordinance, Read More...


2023 PTD 499
Islamabad High Court 2023 MESSRS PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122(5A) & (9) Constitution, Art.199 Notice under Amendment of assessment

Amendment of assessment----Pre-Conditions----Petitioner / assessee was aggrieved of show-cause notice issued by authorities to amend its assessment---Authorities objected to maintainability of petition against show cause Read More...


2023 PTD 505
Lahore High Court 2023 MESSRS PRESSON DESCON INTERNATIONAL
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 124, 221 & 226 rectification application/ Appeal Effect Order

Appeal Effect Order, non-issuing of----Plea of rectification----Petitioner / taxpayer was aggrieved of non-issuance of Appeal Effect Order by authorities on the plea of pending rectification application----Inactions in discharge of Read More...


2023 PTD 516
Lahore High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, LAHORE
VS
MESSRS DAEWOO PAKISTAN MOTORWAY SERVICES (PVT.) LTD.
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 113 & 133(1) Final Tax Return/ Turnover

Final Tax Return. Turnover dispute was with regard final discharge of liability over turnover. Turnover excluded tax paid or payable as final discharge of tax liability. Explanation added through Finance Act, 2012 replicated exclusion of deemed income assessed as Read More...


2022 PTD 1019
2022 PTCL 852
Lahore High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
TOYOTA WALTON MOTORS AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 114(6), 114(6A), 122(5A), 122(9), 133(1) Filing of revised return

Reference revised return, filing of amendment of assessment. Dispute was with regard to filing of revised return which was rejected by authorities. When revised return was furnished it was in conformity with S. 114 (6A)of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, and Read More...


2022 PTD 1035
Sindh High Court 2022 TAHIR ASHRAF DURRANI AND OTHERS
VS
FEDERAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY, THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL, F.I.A., HEADQUARTER, PESHAWAR MORR, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 227 Suit or criminal prosecution against taxpayers was barred unless a prior approval is granted by FBR

Quashing of proceedings. Prior approval of FBR. Petitioners were serving in FBR and Income Tax department. Federal investigating Agency initiated investigation against petitioners for committing criminal breach of trust, cheating, forgery and misconduct. Contention Read More...


2022 PTD 1040
Lahore High Court 2022 MESSRS ASIAN FOOD INDUSTRIES LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER FINANCE AND OTHERS
VS
FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND 4 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 114, 120, 122, 174(3), 177 Charging further tax/ change of opinion

Constitutional petition Change of opinion. Scope Dispute was with regard to concept of “change of opinion” as show cause notice issued under S. 65 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 (since repealed) was not applicable for a show-cause notice under S. 122 of Read More...


2022 PTD 1069
Sindh High Court 2022 MESSRS YUNUS TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED THROUGH CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122(4), 122(4)(a), 122(4)(b), 122(5A) Assessment order Amendment Period of limitation

Assessment order Amendment Period of limitation Word “or” used after S. 122 (4) (a) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Scope Two conditions, as provided in clauses (a) & (b) of S. 122(4) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, where Commissioner wants to further Read More...


2022 PTD 1082
Sindh High Court 2022 MESSRS YUNUS TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED THROUGH CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 122 Notice/ barred by time/ Amendment of assessment order

Amendment of assessment order. Limitation Petitioner taxpayer was aggrieved of show cause notice issued by authorities to furnish reply warranting further amendment under S. 122 (5-A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Plea raised by petitioner/ taxpayer was that matter Read More...


2022 PTD 1082
Islamabad High Court 2022 MESSRS TELENOR PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 4 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 54, 124 & 134A Alternate dispute resolution

Alternate dispute resolution. Recovery notice plea raised by Petitioner Company was that all orders passed by various forums had to be taken into account before initiating recovery proceedings. The liability to pay tax was relatable to assessment order or an order Read More...


2022 PTD 1097
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2022 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL)
VS
ASKARI BANK LIMITED, RAWALPINDI
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 23 Eligible depreciable asset/ Initial allowance, deduction

Taxpayer can claim deduction of initial allowance for an eligible depreciable asset (such as a building) being put to use by the taxpayer for the first time in a tax year, irrespective of the fact that the said building had been in use in the past in the hands of Read More...


2022 PTD 1109
Lahore High Court 2022 FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 114, 120, 122, 153(1)(b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) Sections: 12(2), O.XLVII Ignorance of law and fact

Ignorance of law and fact. Authorities sought review of judgment passed by High Court on the basis of conceding statement made in favour of taxpayer. The power to review in available in Constitutional jurisdiction, as provisions, of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, are Read More...


2022 PTD 1123
(2022)126 TAX 548
Lahore High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 | Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Ss. 20, 120, 122(5A), 133 | S. 23 Repealed enactments construction.

Repealed enactments Construction and references to Pricing for retail consumers for natural gas. Question was with regard to development surcharge as expense while computing income from business and expenditure under S. 20 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. The Proviso Read More...


2022 PTD 1135
(2022)126 TAX 73
Lahore High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE
VS
Syed BHAIS LIGHTING LIMITED
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 | Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 133 (1) & 161 | S. 156 Notice, issuance of Limitation Dispute

Notice, issuance of Limitation Dispute was with regard to applying provision of S. 156 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, [since repealed]. Notice under S. 156 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, could not be issued within five years or beyond the period for which taxpayer Read More...


2022 PTD 1161
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE
VS
HNR COMPANY (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 120, 121(1)(d) & 122(2) Best judgment assessment order

Best judgment assessment order under section 121(1)(d) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (“the Ordinance’) Such order cannot be made in cases where deemed assessment order has already been made under Section 120 of the Ordinance and, therefore, section Read More...


2022 PTD 1169
(2022)125 TAX 354
2022 PTCL 463
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2022 UMER AYAZ KHAN
VS
SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 12, 149, & 153 Payment for goods, services and contracts

Salary Payment for goods, services and contracts. Scope Complainant was a temporary lecturer at a government college. College deducted income tax at the rate of 20% from salary of the complainant. Contention of complainant was that his salary was below the taxable Read More...


2022 PTD 1187
Sindh High Court 2022 SANOFI-AVENTIS PAKISTAN LIMITED & OTHERS
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS
INCOME TAX ORDINANCE, 2001 Ss. 80 & 148 - Drugs (Import & Export) Rules, 1976, Rule: 13 Import of drugs for personal use

Person Import of drugs for personal use. Scope Petitioners imported finished pharmaceutical products, which at the relevant time required certification from Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan (DRAP) for claiming a reduced rate of deduction of Income tax under S. Read More...


2022 PTD 1205
(2021)124 TAX 148
Balochistan High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, QUETTA
VS
M/S. SAINDAK METALS LTD, QUETTA
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 120(1) (b), 122(5A) & 133 Limitation/ Amendment of assessment

Limitation dispute between parties was with regard to amended assessment order filed under S. 122 (5A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Respondent/taxpayer filed income tax return for year 2006 on 30-12-2006, which deemed to be an assessment in term of S. 120(1)(b) of Read More...


2022 PTD 1290
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2022 SAMINA YASMIN, PROP; FAISAL ELECTRONICS, WAZIRABAD
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 177 Definite information/ Non-consideration of taxpayer’s explanation

Amendment of assessments Audit Definite information. Non-consideration of taxpayer’s explanation. Effect Appellant/taxpayer assailed orders passed by Commissioner Inland Revenue (CIR) (Appeal) and assessing officer. The Assessing officer by considering the Read More...


2022 PTD 1319
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2022 SAMINA YASMIN, PROP; FAISAL ELECTRONICS, WAZIRABAD
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 177 Audit Scope

Commissioner after completion of audit shall issue audit observations and findings and then after issuing audit report he may amend the assessment order after providing opportunity of hearing to the Read More...


2022 PTD 1319
Lahore High Court 2022 CRESCENT EDUCATIONAL TRUST THROUGH SECRETARY
VS
REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS LAHORE AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 100C Collective Bargaining Agent/ Educational institution

Collective Bargaining Agent. Educational institution ‘Commercial basis’ meaning of Scope. Petitioner/Establishment was aggrieved of registration of private respondent as a Collective Bargaining Agent by the Registrar of Trade Unions. Petitioner was a Read More...


2022 PTD 1384
Lahore High Court 2022 CRESCENT EDUCATIONAL TRUST THROUGH SECRETARY
VS
REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS LAHORE AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 100C Tax credit for charitable organizations

Tax credit for charitable organizations. Scope one of the persons to whom the provision of S. 100C, applies is a trust Subsection (2) of S. 100C, Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, provides the category of income which is eligible for tax credit and includes income from Read More...


2022 PTD 1384
Lahore High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE
VS
COCA COLA PAKISTAN LIMITED, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 | Income Tax Rules, 2001 Ss. 21(c), 2(54), 67, 120, 122(5A), 133, 153(1)(b) | R. 13 Royalty/ Withholding tax, collection of Principal Royalty

Withholding tax, collection of Principal Royalty. Amended assessment order. Respondent taxpayer was manufacturer of soft drinks selling its product exclusively by chain of restaurants through their outlets. Dispute was with regard to collection of tax on amount paid Read More...


2022 PTD 1400
Lahore High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE
VS
COCA COLA PAKISTAN LIMITED, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 133 Exercise of Jurisdiction/ Question of law

Reference High Court, exercise of jurisdiction. Question of law. Scope reference under S. 133 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, lies before High Court on question of law of law only and the Court is obliged to answer the same in accordance with a rule of law. Question Read More...


2022 PTD 1400
Lahore High Court 2022 The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, MULTAN ZONE
VS
MUHAMMAD IQBAL RIND & SONS D.G. KHAN
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120(1), 122(5A), 122(9), 133(1), 231A Amendment of assessment. Preconditions Amendment

Amendment of assessment. Preconditions Amendment of assessment under S. 122(5-A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 can be made only in cases where twin conditions namely, (i) Assessment order is erroneous; and (ii) it is prejudicial to the interest of revenue, are Read More...


2022 PTD 1411
Lahore High Court 2022 The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, MULTAN ZONE
VS
MUHAMMAD IQBAL RIND & SONS D.G. KHAN
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 120(1), 122(5A)(9), 133(1) & 231 Amendment of assessment. Calculation of cash withdrawal

Reference Amendment of assessment. Calculation of cash withdrawal and tax deduction. Erroneous and prejudicial order. Proof Authorities amended assessment order of respondent taxpayer on the plea that it was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Read More...


2022 PTD 1411
Sindh High Court 2022 MESSRS CELLANDGENE PHARMACEUTICAL INTERNATIONAL THROUGH PARTNER
VS
THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 177 Selection for audit/ vested constitutional rights

Petitioner assailed its selection for audit vide impugned notice on the premise that the selection did not fulfill the criteria of S. 177 (7) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Contention of Petitioner was that there were no reasonable grounds to call for the audit Read More...


2022 PTD 1464
Sindh High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
DAWOOD ISLAMIC BANK LIMITED (NOW BURJ BANK)
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 133, 108 & 109 Transactions between associates/ Recharacterisation of income and deductions

Transactions between associates Recharacterisation of income and deductions. Scope Question before High Court was whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified to delete the addition made by Assessing Officer on account of interest on the advances/disbursement to a Read More...


2022 PTD 1474
(2021)124 TAX 329
Sindh High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I
VS
MESSRS EXCELL PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 20, 32, 34, 122, 133 Method of accounting and accrual –basis accounting Principles

Method of accounting and accrual –basis accounting Principles. Entry made in accounts, as per accounting system employed by a person regularly maintained by him is considered to be valid allowable, if it is not contrary to other provisions of law. In Read More...


2022 PTD 1535
Sindh High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I
VS
MESSRS EXCELL PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 20, 32, 34, 122, 133 Method of accounting and accrual –basis accounting Principles

Method of accounting and accrual-basis accounting. Principles. Entry made in accounts. Assessing Authority did not accept claim of loss suffered by taxpayer due to currency exchange rate and added the loss into total income of taxpayer. Appellate Authority deleted Read More...


2022 PTD 1535
Sindh High Court 2022 MESSRS TELENOR MICRO FINANCE BANK LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 53, 133, 150, 151, 159, 159(1), 159(2), 161, 233, Second Sched. Part IV, Cl. 47B Withholding tax. Exemption Certificate

Withholding tax. Exemption Certificate. Recovery of tax. Dispute between parties was that in absence of Certificate of exemption under S.159 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, applicant/ Tax payer was liable to recovery of tax under S. 161 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Read More...


2022 PTD 1619
Lahore High Court 2022 ASHIQ ALI CHAUDHARY
VS
FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 127, 161, 205 Appeal filing electronically/ Art. 10-A of the Constitution

Appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) Prescribed form of appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) Scope Case of petitioner was that he was required to file an appeal under S. 127of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001; that R. 76 of the Income Tax Rules, 2000, provided but remedy Read More...


2022 PTD 1627
(2021)124 TAX 237
Islamabad High Court 2022 MESSRS TELENOR PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.
VS
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 133 Suspension of judgment passed by High Court

Suspension of judgment passed by High Court. Scope Applicant sought sixty days’ time to approach the Supreme Court and in the meanwhile Income Tax Department be restrained from recovery of the tax, the request was made on the basis of referred precedents. Read More...


2022 PTD 1632
Sindh High Court 2022 MESSRS SINDH IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE AUTHORITY (SIDA)
VS
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX HYDERABAD ZONE, HYDERABAD AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 84 Filing of separate income tax return

Joint Venture Association of Persons (AOP). Filing of separate income tax return. Non-Resident status, determination of Dispute was with regard to treating Joint Venture Association of Persons as Non-Resident by imposing tax at the rate of 15% instead of 5%. Held, Read More...


2022 PTD 1679
Islamabad High Court 2022 SUNGI DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND TRUSTEES
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, REVENUE AND ECONOMIC AFFAIRS AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 4(1) (s) & 140 Tax recovery. Coercive measures. Mechanism Redressal of grievances.

Coercive measures. Mechanism Redressal of grievances. FBR  is endowed with duty to facilitate taxpayers and establish mechanism to address their grievances and complaints. Under fiscal laws, including Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, officials are conferred vast Read More...


2022 PTD 1690
Islamabad High Court 2022 SUNGI DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND TRUSTEES
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, REVENUE AND ECONOMIC AFFAIRS AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122(5A), 140 & 170 Authorities recovered amount of tax from Bank account of petitioner/ taxpayer

Constitutional petition. Refunds Coercive measures Authorities recovered amount of tax from Bank account of petitioner/ taxpayer. Grievance of petitioner / taxpayer was that amount recovered from bank account was not due and it was illegal and unlawful. The Read More...


2022 PTD 1690
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2022 M/s Zia Steel Re-Rolling Mills, 1-10, Islamabad.
VS
Commissioner Inland Revenue, Enf-IX, LTU, Islamabad.
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 182(1), SRO No. 550(I)/2012 dated 23-05-2012 & SRO No. 494(I)/2013 dated 10-06-2013 Late filing of income tax returns

Failure to furnish return of income. Scope Appellant was imposed upon penalties for late filing of income tax returns for the tax years 2011 and 2012. The Federal Government through SRO No. 550(I)/2012 dated 23-05-2012 had allowed the steel melters to deposit the Read More...


2022 PTD 1722
(2021)123 TAX 239
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2022 MESSRS KOHINOOR SPINNING MILLS LTD.
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 131 & 133 Questions of law not raised before the Tribunal or High Court/ Supreme Court

Questions of law not raised before the Tribunal or High Court. Supreme Court is not a forum to raise fresh questions of law which have not been examined by the Tribunal or the High Court or do not even arise from the decision of the Tribunal. In numerous cases, a Read More...


2022 PTD 1727
Supreme Court Of Pakistan 2022 MESSRS KOHINOOR SPINNING MILLS LTD.
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 21(e) Income from business, computation of Deductions not allowed

Income from business, computation of Deductions not allowed. Contributions made by tax-payer Company to an unproved gratuity fund. Section 21(e) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 clearly stipulates that the contributions to an unapproved gratuity fund cannot be Read More...


2022 PTD 1727
Sindh High Court 2022 PAKISTAN PETROLEUM LTD
VS
PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) Ss. 172, 127 & 227 | S. 9 Courts to try all civil suits unless barred

Representatives Appeal to Commissioner (Appeals) Bar of suits in Civil Courts. Scope Plaintiff challenged a show-cause notice issued under S. 172(5) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 through a civil suit. The Order passed under S. 172(3)(f) of the Income Tax Read More...


2022 PTD 1742
(2022)126 TAX 107
Sindh High Court 2022 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES ZONE-IV, KARACHI
VS
MUHAMMAD HAMID
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Ss. 65, 62 & 136 Additional assessment/ reopening of previously completed assessment

Additional assessment/ reopening of previously completed assessment on basis of “Definite Information” Nature and meaning of term “definite information”. Scope. Question before High Court was whether assessment of taxpayer could be reopened Read More...


2022 PTD 1752
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2022 MESSRS CHINA NATIONAL ELECTRIC WIRE AND CABLE IMPORT AND EXPORT CORPORATION, LAHORE
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 127, 128, 129, 129(4), 131, 131(1), 122 Rectification of mistakes. Appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. Decision in appeal. Oral order

Rectification of mistakes. Appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. Decision in appeal. Oral order, legality of Scope. Appellate Tribunal while invoking its jurisdiction under S. 221 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 on its own observed that in an earlier order it had Read More...


2022 PTD 1839
Islamabad High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, ISLAMABAD
VS
MESSRS PEARL SECURITY (PVT.) LIMITED
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 133, 170, 170(4), 170(5)(b) Limitation / Inaction of authorities Effect

Question was with regard to limitation of tax refund. Taxpayer was estopped from asserting a favorable refund order by default where it had statutory recourse against inaction of authorities, which it opted not to pursue. Taxpayer not filing an appeal under S. Read More...


2022 PTD 1876
Baluchistan High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, QUETTA
VS
MESSRS BALOCHISTAN ONYX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 133 Audit, selection for Definite information. Pre- condition

Audit, selection for definite information. Pre- condition. Case of respondent/taxpayer was selected for audit by Commissioner Inland Revenue. The Adjudicating authority i.e. Commissioner Inland Revenue in violation to legal provision as it stood then on 07/07/2009 Read More...


2022 PTD 1889
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2022 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI
VS
M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 177 Failure to obtain taxpayer’s explanation on issued raised in the audit report

Amendment of assessment. Audit ‘Definite information’. Failure to obtain taxpayer’s explanation on issued raised in the audit report. Effect department assailed officer amending the deemed assessment was set aside. Amended assessment was framed on Read More...


2022 PTD 1895
(2019)120 TAX 125
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2022 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI
VS
M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 177 Audit report/audit observation/ objections/ charge sheet

Amendment of assessment. Audit. Procedure Scope ‘Definite information’ Assessing Officer, after formulation of the audit report/audit observation/objections/charge sheet, ought to first confront the same to the taxpayer and secondly, after considering Read More...


2022 PTD 1895
(2019)120 TAX 125
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2022 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI
VS
M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 177 Audit/ Amendment of assessment

Amendment of assessment. Scope Section 177 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, does not in itself provide any power or absolute empowerment to modify assessment or re-determine the income of taxpayer. Key point to be kept in mind is that it is not a return of income Read More...


2022 PTD 1895
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2022 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI
VS
M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 177 Conducting of audit proceeding is just a process

Audit Amendment of assessment. Procedure. Scope selection for audit or even conducting and audit does not mean modification of assessment. Selection for audit and thereafter conducting of audit proceeding is just a process. Assessing officer, before invoking the Read More...


2022 PTD 1895
(2019)120 TAX 125
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2022 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI
VS
M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 Such language restricts all further proceedings for amendment

Expression ‘subject to this section’ Scope. Provisions of S. 122 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, start with the language “subject to this section”. Such language restricts all further proceedings for amendment of an assessment which means it Read More...


2022 PTD 1895
(2019)120 TAX 125
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2022 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI
VS
M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 177 & 122 Definite information

Audit Amendment of assessment. Procedure Scope. ‘Definite information’ Scope. Deemed assessment, if selected for audit, may be amended by invoking jurisdiction under S. 122(1), Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, subject to fulfillment of conditions as envisaged Read More...


2022 PTD 1895
(2019)120 TAX 125
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2022 MESSRS NEW DADU SUGAR MILLS (PVT.) LTD. KARACHI
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, LTU-II, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 131, 132 Limitation Successive appeals

Appeal to Appellate Tribunal. Limitation Successive appeals on the same cause of action. Scope. Appellant filed application for grant of stay along with supporting appeal for the third time against the same order of refusal to stay the recovery of tax demand by the Read More...


2022 PTD 1927
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2022 M/s. Peshawar Electric Supply Company, Limited, (PESCO), Peshawar.
VS
The CIR, RTO, Peshawar.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 153, 153(1)(b), 161, 177, Second Schedule-Part (IV)-Clause 46AA Payments for goods, services and contracts

SRO 586(1)/91 dated: 30-06-1991---Failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Payments for goods, services and contracts---Exemptions and tax concessions-Scope---Department raised demand and imposed liabilities upon the appellant for its Read More...


2023 PTD 911
2022 PTCL 899
Lahore High Court 2022 The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, LAHORE
VS
SHAZIA ZAFAR
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 111, 122 & 133 Unexplained income or assets/ Separate notice

Unexplained income or assets Separate notice, issuance of Words “the person offers no explanation” and “or the explanation offered by the person is not, in the Commissioner’s opinion, satisfactory” Scope Dispute was with regard to Read More...


2022 PTD 1942
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2022 M/s. Peshawar Electric Supply Company, Limited, (PESCO), Peshawar.
VS
The CIR, RTO, Peshawar.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Qanun-e-Shahadat 1984 Art. 129(e) Administration of justice

Thing required by law to be done in a certain manner must be done in the same manner as prescribed by law or not at all. 
Art. 129(e)---Public documents---Presumption---Scope---Presumption of regularity and correctness is Read More...


2023 PTD 911
2022 PTCL 899
Lahore High Court 2022 PEPSI COLA INTERNATIONAL (PRIVATE) LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 161, 161(3), 162, 174, 174(3) Maintenance of Record

Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)-----Ss.174(3), 161 , 162---Records, information collection and audit---Maintenance of record by taxpayer---Statutorily required time-period for maintenance of such record----Maintenance of record after lapse of statutorily Read More...


2022 PTD 51
(2022)125 TAX 55
2023 PTCL 60
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2022 MESSRS SHAHPOSH GARMENTS, GUJRANWALA
VS
THE CIR ZONE-II, RTO, GUJRANWALA
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 13 Double jeopardy / Protection against double punishment

Protection against double punishment and self-incrimination. Scope issuance of a notice regarding the same taxed amounts tantamount to double jeopardy which cannot be given legal credence but also offends and defies the fundamental rights set out in Art. 13 of the Read More...


2022 PTD 187
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, FAISALABAD
VS
ABDUL HAMEED, LABOUR CONTRACTOR
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss: 53(1)(b), 153, 153(1)(c), 153(9) Services, meaning/ Rendering of labour and carriage services

"Services", meaning of Scope. Rendering of labour and carriage services. Whether income from labour and carriage services is liable to fixed tax regime. Held, that definition of ‘services’ in subsection (9) of section 153 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More...


2022 PTD 1673
(2022)126 TAX 438
Lahore High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
TOYOTA WALTON MOTORS and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114(6), 114(6A), 122(5A), 122(9), 133(1) Delay was negligible

Dismissal of revision petition being barred by 16 days/Validity/Such delay was negligible/Commissioner instead of knocking out the petitioner on technicalities, ought to have considered his prayer on merits/Order of Commissioner refusing Read More...


2022 PTD 1035
Lahore High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
TOYOTA WALTON MOTORS and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114(6), 114(6A), 122(5A), 122(9), 133(1) Judiciary

Judiciary is respected not on account of its power to legalize injustice on technical grounds, but because it is capable of removing injustice and is expected to do Read More...


2022 PTD 1035
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2022 MESSRS AYAN TRADING COMPANY, FAISALABAD
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 21, 33, 34, 46, 73 Judgment

Judgment is an authority only in respect to what it decides, and only with regard to the proposition of law raised, in that case, and therefore point not argued before the Court cannot be considered to have been dealt with by its Read More...


2022 PTD 683
Lahore High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-1), RTO, RAWALPINDI
VS
TARIQ MAHMOOD. PROPRIETOR STANDARD MEDICAL STORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 113, 122(5A), 133(1) & Second Schedule, Part-III, clause 8 Fast Moving consumer goods

Tax rebate, the entitlement of Authorities were aggrieved of the order passed by Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue against tax rebate allowed to taxpayer who Read More...


2022 PTD 1
Peshawar High Court 2022 SIKANDAR HAYAT AND 16 OTHERS
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 53, Second Schedule, Part-I, Clause 146, Part-IV, Clause 110 Tribal Area/exemption from payment of income tax

Tax Relief Petitioners were civil servants who claimed tax relief in their salaries on the plea that they were also residents of erstwhile Provisionally Read More...


2022 PTD 11
Lahore High Court 2022 RAZA MOTOR INDUSTRIES
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S.177 [as substituted through Finance Act, 2010] Selection of Audit/ Call documents

Petitioners/ taxpayers were aggrieved of notices of selection of their case for audit. Plea raised by petitioners/taxpayers was that Read More...


2022 PTD 19
Lahore High Court 2022 PEPSI COLA INTERNATIONAL (PRIVATE) LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 161, 161(3), 162, 174, 174(3) Burden on Department to justify delayed proceedings

Records, information collection and audit---Maintenance of record by taxpayer---Statutorily required time-period for maintenance of such record. Maintenance Read More...


2022 PTD 51
(2022)125 TAX 55
2023 PTCL 60
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT (LTU), LAHORE
VS
MESSRS PEPSI COLA INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 24(11), 122, 120(1)(b), 122(2), 122(5A) Reassessment made/ beyond time limitation

Reassessment principle limitation taxpayer was aggrieved of reassessment made by Assessing Officer beyond time limitation. It was Read More...


2022 PTD 97
Sindh High Court 2022 Dr. ZAFAR SAJJAD through authorized attorney
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE-III, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 2(20), 12, 18(b), 120, 122(9), 133 & Sched. II, Part-III cl. 1(2) proviso [as inserted by Finance Act, 2019] Amendment effects/changes in law/ clinical supplements and incentives

Taxpayer, a permanent employee of a Hospital Salary - Clinical supplements and incentives. Show-Cause notice, issuance of Taxpayers (assessees) were aggrieved of show-cause notice issued to them to include clinical supplements and incentives received by them from Read More...


2022 PTD 109
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2022 MESSRS SHAHPOSH GARMENTS, GUJRANWALA
VS
THE CIR ZONE-II, RTO, GUJRANWALA
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 18, 20, 111, 111(1)(d), 111(1)(d)(i), 120(A), 122(1), 122(5)(ii), 129(1) Unexplained income or assets/ Production and sales are the particulars of income but not income by itself

Appellant assailed order passed by department as well as Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the amount of gross sales was held to be its income and was taxed accordingly.

Appellant had rightly availed Amnesty Scheme under the Voluntary Declaration of Domestic Read More...


2022 PTD 187
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ETC.
VS
JAHANGIR KHAN TAREEN & OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120(1), 122(4), 122(5), 122(5A), 122(9), 209 & 209(2) Show cause notice Scope and purpose

Show cause notice was delivered to a person by an authority in order to get the reply back with a reasonable cause as to why a particular action should not be taken against him with regard to the defaulting act. By and large, it was a well-defined and Read More...


2022 PTD 232
(2021)124 TAX 552
2022 PTCL 1
Peshawar High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE AND OTHERS
VS
MUHAMMAD TAHIR AND BROTHERS OGHI MANSEHRA AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 53, 133, Second Schedule Merger of Tribal Areas/ all laws including Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 became applicable

Tribal Areas Merger of Tribal Areas into settled areas Automatic applicability of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 to areas that cease to be Tribal Areas by operation of Art. 247(6) of the Constitution. Question before High Court was whether after cessation of a District Read More...


2022 PTD 283
(2022)126 TAX 370
2022 PTCL 513
Sindh High Court 2022 OBS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH MANAGER LEGAL
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 170, 170(2), 221 Retrospective effect of Circular

FBR Circular No. 4 of 2000, dated 17-2-2000 (FBR Circular) Workers Welfare Fund. Adjustment, availing of Retrospective effect of Circular Scope. Petitioners/ companies were required to contribute towards their workers’ welfare as Workers’ Welfare Fund. Read More...


2022 PTD 290
2023 PTCL 466
Lahore High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE
VS
MESSRS MONNOOWAL TEXTILE MILLS LTD., LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 67, 122(1), 122(5), 122(9), 133, 154(4), 169(1) Apportionment of expenditure Amendment in tax return

Apportionment of expenditure Amendment in tax return. Dispute was with regard to apportionment of expenditure incurred and adjustments claimed by taxpayer under R. 231 of Income Tax Rules, 2002. Plea raised by authorities was that apportionment of expenditures was Read More...


2022 PTD 305
(2022)125 TAX 65
2022 PTCL 430
Sindh High Court 2022 HONG KONG SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION LTD.
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Ss. 61, 62, 135 & 136 Loan to employee/ expenditure

Loan to employee’s Factual controversy. Appellant/taxpayer was a Banking Company and dispute was with regard to amounts advanced to its employees as loan. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ignored examination of factual aspect that whether any expenditure was Read More...


2022 PTD 310
2022 PTCL 437
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2022 M/S. KARACHI PORT TRUST KARACHI
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 221 Rectification of mistake. Pendency of Reference before High Court against the same order

Appellant sought rectification of order passed by the Tribunal. Appellant had also filed an Income Tax Reference Application against the same order of the Tribunal before the High Court. Appellant could not have the best of both worlds, as seeking relief Read More...


2022 PTD 325
(2021)123 TAX 300
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2022 M/S. KARACHI PORT TRUST KARACHI
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 221 Rectification of mistake. Review jurisdiction

Rectification of mistake. Review jurisdiction Scope Resolution of once decided issue tantamount to “review”, which is not allowed to the Tribunal and falls under the domain of Superior Courts.

Rectification of mistake Scope of rectification is Read More...


2022 PTD 325
(2021)123 TAX 300
Lahore High Court 2022 MESSRS EMIRATES SUPPLY CHAIN SERVICES (PVT.) LIMITED
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 131 & 132 Interim relief to taxpayer granted by Appellate Tribunal

Adjudication by Appellate Tribunal---Scope---Petitioner taxpayer impugned order of Appellate Tribunal whereby interim relief already granted to taxpayer and extended subsequently five times by Appellate Tribunal was later declined during pendency of main appeal, Read More...


2022 PTD 404
Islamabad High Court 2022 PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LTD.
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 122(5), 122(5A), 122(5AA) & 122(4) Power of Commissioner to further amend / alter assessment

Amendment of assessments---Power of Commissioner to further amend / alter assessment in terms of Ss.122 (5A) & 122(5AA) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Time Barred amendment in assessments not sustainable---Scope---Petitioner/Taxpayer impugned notice for further Read More...


2022 PTD 413
(2022)126 TAX 218
2022 PTCL 503
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2022 MANZOOR AHMAD
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE II, RTO, FAISALABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 21(m,), 111, 111(1)(b), 120, 122, 122(5A), 122(9), 127, 131, 231A Amendment of assessments---Failure to confront specific provision

Failure to confront specific provision in notice---Scope---Taxpayer assailed order passed by assessing officer whereby he had amended the demand assessment order and the dismissal of his appeal---Show cause notice issued to the taxpayer did not reflect the addition Read More...


2022 PTD 420
Sindh High Court 2022 ALPHA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
VS
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL ZONE-A, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Ss. 65 & 136 Additional assessment---Exercise of authority under S.65

Exercise of authority under S.65 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 for additional assessment of taxpayer---Inadmissible expenditures---Scope---Question before High Court was whether income tax assessment of taxpayer, which was an insurance company, could be reopened Read More...


2022 PTD 439
2022 PTCL 534
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2022 FAWAD AHMAD MUKHTAR
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-II), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(a), 4(4), 4(5), 5, 8, 39, 150 Dividend in specie received by the taxpayer/ Income from other sources

Dividend in specie received by the taxpayer is income and taxable under S. 5 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001--Dividends constitute a separate block of income that is brought to tax in terms of S. 5 of the 2001 Ordinance---Dividends are to be taxed as a separate Read More...


2022 PTD 454
(2022)125 TAX 481
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2022 FAWAD AHMAD MUKHTAR
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-II), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 2(19)(a), 4(4), 4(5), 5, 8, 39, 150 Each tax year is a separate unit of account/ Exemption clause

Each tax year is a separate unit of account and taxation and the law has to be applied as it stood in respect of that tax year alone. Tax statute---Exemption clause---Retrospective effect---Scope---Exemption clause has a beneficial effect does not mean that it Read More...


2022 PTD 454
(2022)125 TAX 481
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2022 FAWAD AHMAD MUKHTAR
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-II), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 5 & 150 Dividends, tax on

Distinction---Section 5 speaks of the dividend being “received” by a person from a company, while S. 150 speaks of the dividend being “paid” by the latter---Former is a general expression , bringing to tax all that is received by way of Read More...


2022 PTD 454
(2022)125 TAX 481
Sindh High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER (LEGAL DIVISION) LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, KARACHI
VS
BROOK BOND PAKISTAN LIMITED, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 50(4A), 52 & 86 Commission/trade discount---Assessee in default

Commission/trade discount---Assessee in default---Determination---Sale agreement---Scope---Respondent-assessee claimed  that disputed amount was not commission rather it was trade discount, therefore no tax was deducted---Assessing Officer made assessment under Read More...


2022 PTD 467
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2022 TOURSISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF PUNJAB, LAHORE
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, CRTO, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 | Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 161 & 205 | S. 50 & 156 Deduction of tax at source---Rectification of mistake

Failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Deduction of tax at source---Rectification of mistake---Scope---Assessing officer worked out tax liability under Ss. 161 & 205 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, for its failure to deduct or deposit withholding Read More...


2022 PTD 547
(2023)127 TAX 166
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2022 TOURSISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF PUNJAB, LAHORE
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, CRTO, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 | Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 161 & 205 | S. 50 & 156 Deduction of tax at source---Rectification of mistake

Failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Deduction of tax at source---Rectification of mistake---Default surcharge, determination of---Scope---Assessing officer worked out tax liability under Ss.161 & 205 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, for its failure to Read More...


2022 PTD 547
(2023)127 TAX 166
Sindh High Court 2022 ALLIED ENGINEERING AND SERVICES LTD. THROUGH ATTORNEY
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 67, 169, 18, 20 & 11 Deductions in computing income chargeable under head “Income from Business

Deductions in computing income chargeable under head “Income from Business”---Composite business activities---Expenses common to income under Normal Business Income and Presumptive Tax Regime---Apportionment of deductions---Scope---Question before High Read More...


2022 PTD 558
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2022 M/S. INDUS PENCIL INDUSTRIES (PVT) LIMITED, KARACHI
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE- I, LTU-II, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 113 Minimum tax on the income of certain persons

Minimum tax on the income of certain persons---Scope---Appellant/taxpayer adjusted tax under Cl. (c) of subsection (2) of S.113 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, For two years---Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue (DCIR) adjusted such carried forward excess amount from Read More...


2022 PTD 599
(2020)122 TAX 102
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2022 M/S. INDUS PENCIL INDUSTRIES (PVT) LIMITED, KARACHI
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE- I, LTU-II, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 113 Minimum tax on the income of certain persons

Minimum tax on the income of certain persons---Scope---Clause (a) of subsection (2) of S.113, Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, provides that the aggregate of the person’s turnover as defined in subsection (3) for the tax year shall be treated as the income of the Read More...


2022 PTD 599
(2020)122 TAX 102
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2022 M/S. INDUS PENCIL INDUSTRIES (PVT) LIMITED, KARACHI
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE- I, LTU-II, KARACHI
INCOME TAX ORDINANCE, 2001 (XLIX OF 2001) 113, 122, 122(1) & 122(5A) Courts are merely supposed to interpret the law

Scope---Courts are merely supposed to interpret the law as it is and have no authority to add, delete or subtract any word in or from the language used by the legislature and in a taxing statute, a tax on any person is to be levied by clear and unambiguous words and Read More...


2022 PTD 599
(2020)122 TAX 102
Sindh High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-III), LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT
VS
M/S NEW JUBILEE INSURANCE CO. LIMITED
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 26(a), 99, 122 (5A) & 133 Term ‘subject to adjustment’/ Amendment of assessment

Term ‘subject to adjustment’---Amendment of assessment---Scope---Authorities withdrew the advantages given to taxpayer company on account of its associated company and revised the assessment order by making an addition to its tax assessment---Appellate Read More...


2022 PTD 618
2022 PTCL 624
Sindh High Court 2022 GOVIND RAM
VS
THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 | Anti-Money Laundering Act 2010 S. 176 | S. 3 Offence of money laundering/ un-accounted amounts

Notice to obtain information or evidence---Offence of money laundering---Scope---Petitioners through constitutional petitions attempted to set the process at naught from initiating the proceedings as under took  by the Income Tax department in terms of Read More...


2022 PTD 634
Sindh High Court 2022 GOVIND RAM
VS
THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 | Anti-Money Laundering Act 2010 S. 111 | S. 3 Offence of money laundering/ un-accounted amounts

Unexplained income or assets---Offense of money laundering---Scope---Non-declaration of an asset by assessee under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, is not a scheduled offence, unless proved otherwise as required under the Anti-Money Laundering Act, Read More...


2022 PTD 634
Sindh High Court 2022 GOVIND RAM
VS
THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS
Anti-Money Laundering Act (VII of 2010) Ss. 3 & 5 Offence of money laundering/ property is proceeds of crime

National Executive Committee to combat money laundering---Scope---Under the Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010, a person is presumed to be guilty of offence of money laundering if he acquires, converts, possesses, uses or transfers property knowing or having reason to Read More...


2022 PTD 634
Sindh High Court 2022 SALEEM BUTT
VS
PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION AND 2 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 177(1) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 42 & 54. Audit Notice / Mala fide, proof of

Suit for declaration and injunction. Mala fide, proof of- Show-cause notice Plaintiff/ taxpayer assailed show-cause notice to conduct audit on the plea of mala fide and discrimination. Held. Mere allegation of mala fides was not enough to dislodge presumption of Read More...


2022 PTD 716
2022 PTCL 793
Peshawar High Court 2022 LUCKY CEMENT LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 11(2) Show cause notice Tax not paid

Show cause notice Tax not paid Petitioner was income tax assessee, who called in question show-cause notices for tax period November 2013 to March 2018 and July 2013 to October 2013 respectively issued by Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue. Plea raised by petitioner Read More...


2022 PTD 729
(2022)126 TAX 600
2022 PTCL 776
Lahore High Court 2022 ROMEX INTERNATIONAL
VS
The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 127(2), 128(1AA) Applicability Interim relief

Maxim: ‘actus curiae neminem gravabit’ Applicability Interim relief, extension in delay in disposal of appeal. Petitioners were tax payers who sought extension in interim relief. ----Maxim: ‘actus curiae neminem gravait’ could be involed only Read More...


2022 PTD 760
Lahore High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LEGAL DIVISION, RTO, LAHORE
VS
MESSRS MECO (PVT.) LTD. LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 S. 64 Limitation for assessment

Limitation for assessment Scope. Question before High Court was whether time imitation for an assessment also included the time consumed in service of order, whereas S. 64 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, determined the time limitation for an assessment only. Read More...


2022 PTD 809
Sindh High Court 2022 ATLAS HONDA LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY
VS
PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRTARY REVENUE AND 3 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance, 2011 S. 177, 177(1), 213, 214, 214C Audit Selection of case/ jurisdictions of Commissioner

Audit Selection of case. Commissioner and FBR , jurisdictions of Commissioner under S. 177 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, is required to apply his mind and provide reasons for selection, Whereas FBRunder S. 214C of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, may select a person Read More...


2022 PTD 866
Sindh High Court 2022 ATLAS HONDA LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY
VS
PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRTARY REVENUE AND 3 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance, 2011 Ss.177, 213, 214 & 214C Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 Audit Selection of case/ jurisdictions of Commissioner

Constitutional petition Audit, selection of case. Jurisdiction of commissioner. Judicial review. Directions of FBR Scope. Petitioners/ taxpayers were aggrieved of issuance of notices by Commissioner selecting there cases for audit on the basis of directions from Read More...


2022 PTD 866
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV, LAHORE
VS
M/S PANTHER SPORTS & RUBBER INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD, ETC
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 161(1A), 165(2B) & 174(3) Income Tax Rules, 2002 Rr. 29(4) & 44(4). Records to be maintained for a period of six years

Books of account, documents and records to be maintained for a period of six years. Scope of section 174(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Taxpayer is obliged to maintain the record under section 174(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 for a period of six years Read More...


2022 PTD 888
(2022)126 TAX 9
2022 PTCL 544
Lahore High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-VII, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE-II, LAHORE
VS
MESSRS TECHLOGIX PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 113(3)(b), 133(1), 153(1)(b), 153(6) & first proviso Payments for goods and services/ Insertion of third proviso

Maximum tax Scope Dispute was with regard to applicability of proviso added to S. 153(6) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue set aside orders passed by two forums below. --- Turnover, in terms of reenacted S. 113(3)(b) of Income Tax Read More...


2022 PTD 893
Sindh High Court 2022 SAKRAND SUGAR MILLS LIMITED
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 111 & 182 Assessment and penalty proceedings.

Assessment and penalty proceedings. Penalty, imposing of Particulars of income. Determination. Read More...


2022 PTD 901
Lahore High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE
VS
NEWAGE CABLES (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 153(7)(iv) Amendment of assessment/ Failure to issue of show cause notice

Customs General Order No. 11/2007, dated 28-08-2007. Amendment of assessment “Manufacturer” Meanings -- Failure to issue of show cause notice. Scope. Question before High Court was whether business of respondent regarding slitting/cutting of copper Read More...


2022 PTD 910
(2022)125 TAX 388
Lahore High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
MESSRS GRAYS LEASING LTD.
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 133(1), 133(5), 161 Lease rental income

Lease rental income. Scope Dispute was with regard to assessment of lease rental income under S. 12(19) of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 on actual receipt basis and not on accrual basis. The Assessee could not claim depreciation, initial and normal and simultaneously Read More...


2022 PTD 951
2022 PTCL 811
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE
VS
ASIF KAMAL
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 177, 177(6) Appeal dismissed/ appellant dept. was absent

Preamble Revenue cases Lack of assistance provided by the counsel and officials of the FBR  and its Inland Revenue department. During the hearing before the Supreme Court, the copies of the show cause notice sent to the taxpayer, the audit report, the response Read More...


2022 PTD 965
(2022)125 TAX 351
2022 PTCL 480
Lahore High Court 2022 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, CORPORATE ZONE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, FAISALABAD
VS
MESSRS NIAGRA MILLS (PVT.) LTD.
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 114, 115(4), 120, 122, 122C, 122(1), 122(5A), 133(1), 169(2) Altering/amending assessment order

Altering/amending assessment order. Commissioner income tax. Jurisdiction. Assessment order based on statement of income furnished under S. 115(4) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 could be altered/ amended by Commissioner under S. 122 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Read More...


2022 PTD 978
(2022)126 TAX 43
Peshawar High Court 2022 QASIM SHAH MARBLE FACTORY UMARY, DISTRICT BAJUR THROUGH PROPRIETOR
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH FEDERAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 6 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Preamble Constitution Article: 199 Exemption from income tax

Preamble Notifications SRO No. 1212(I)/2018 dated 5-10-2018 & SRO No. 1213(I)/2018 dated 5-10-2018 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 19. Factual controversy Exemption from income tax Petitioners were industrialists who sought exemption from income tax charged in Read More...


2022 PTD 981
Lahore High Court 2021 RAMZAN SUGAR MILLS LIMITED
VS
FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 S. 122 Amendment of assessment/ Alternate remedy, availability of

Amendment of assessment---Alternate remedy, availability of---Scope---Petitioner assailed notice issue by department under S.122(9) read with S.122(4) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 whereby certain documents were sought from the petitioner---Validity---No adverse Read More...


2021 PTD 1321
| (2022) 125 TAX 170
Lahore High Court 2021 RAMZAN SUGAR MILLS LIMITED
VS
FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 Ss. 120, 121 & 122 Best judgment assessment

Assessment---“Best judgment assessment”---Assessment of assessment---Scope---Assessment is made under Part II of Chapter X of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, which deals with the assessment under S.120 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 while the scheme of Read More...


2021 PTD 1321
| (2022) 125 TAX 170
Lahore High Court 2021 RAMZAN SUGAR MILLS LIMITED
VS
FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 4 Right of individuals

Right of individuals to be dealt in accordance with law---Scope---Under Art.4 of the Constitution, it is an inalienable right of every citizen of Pakistan to be treated in accordance with law and no action detrimental to his/her life, liberty, reputation or property Read More...


2021 PTD 1321
| (2022) 125 TAX 170
Lahore High Court 2021 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE.
VS
M/S THREE STAR RICE FACTORY
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.122 SRO No.57(I)/ 2012, dated 24-01-2012 Amendment of assessment/ Exemption notification-Retrospective operation

Taxpayer, being rice mill, had a special tax year starting from 1st of September till 31st of August----Minimum tax was being paid on normal rates till issuance of SRO No.57(I )/2012, dated: 24-01-2012 and on its issuance the tax for the year 2012 was paid at Read More...


2021 PTD 1
Lahore High Court 2021 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE.
VS
M/S THREE STAR RICE FACTORY
Interpretation of statutes Remedial and curative legislation

Purpose of remedial and curative legislation is to abridge superfluities, remove defects or mischief from an existing law to redress wrongs and injuries being impinged upon the existing rights---Such legislation can be applied retrospectively, if intention of the Read More...


2021 PTD 1
Lahore High Court 2021 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE.
VS
M/S THREE STAR RICE FACTORY
Interpretation of documents Remedial and curative legislation

General rule is that a notification cannot operate retrospective but in case it removes defects, superfluities or mischiefs from an existing notification to advance remedy for enforcement of existing rights, it can be applied retrospectively by the issuing authority Read More...


2021 PTD 1
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2021 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
THE SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) [since repealed] Second Sched. Pt. I, CI. 126F [since omitted]--- Payment of commission by franchisor to the franchisee/exemption from payment Income

Franchisee of mobile company (franchisor) carrying out business in District Nowshera---Payment of commission by franchisor to the franchisee--- Exemption from deduction of advance tax on payment of commission for a period of three years Read More...


2021 PTD 11
Customs Appellate Tribunal 2021 MESSRS M.I. TRADERS, LAHORE
VS
THE PRINCIPAL APPRAISER, GROUP-I, MCC OF APPRAISEMENT-EAST, KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS
Customs Act 1969 S. 2(a), 80, 83, 186, 193-A& 202 Customs Rules, 2001, Rr.438 &442 Order passed by Appellate authority was barred by 70 days

Despite payment of all duties and taxes levied by authorities, goods in question were not released by Customs Authorities---Validity---Authorities were only authorized to take action for issuance of detention notice in terms of S.202 of Read More...


2021 PTD 19
Customs Appellate Tribunal 2021 MESSRS M.I. TRADERS, LAHORE
VS
THE PRINCIPAL APPRAISER, GROUP-I, MCC OF APPRAISEMENT-EAST, KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 2(a), 80, 80(3), 83, 186, 193-A, 202 Speaking order

Every judicial and quasi-judicial finding should be based on reasons containing justification for the finding in the order Read More...


2021 PTD 19
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2021 MESSRS HUSSAIN MILLS LIMITED, KARACHI
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss.182 165 penalties for its failure to furnish monthly statements

Appellant was imposed upon penalties for its failure to furnish monthly statements in term 
of S.165 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Appellant had reasonably explained the cause of its failure to file the statements by stating that it was facing problems in Read More...


2021 PTD 35
Lahore High Court 2021 NEW CHERAT COAL THROUGH PROPRIETOR
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS
Sales Tax Act 1990 S.8(1)(b) SRO No.549(1)/2006 dated 05.06.2006 Input tax adjustment

Goods specified by Federal Government upon which registered person shall not be entitled to reclaim or deduct input tax paid---Nature of power conferred on Federal Government under S.8(1)(b) of Sales Tax Act, 1990-Scope- Petitioners/taxpayers impugned SRO Read More...


2021 PTD 43
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2021 MESSRS SEFAM (PVT.) LTD, LAHORE
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, PESHAWAR
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.127, 128 & 129 proper opportunity of hearing/ audi alterm partem

Appeal to commissioner--Opportunity of hearing-Maxim: audi alteram partem---Applicability--Scope---Nobody can be condemned unheard and no act or action which is detrimental, against the right and interest of a person can be passed without giving him prior notice and Read More...


2021 PTD 47
Customs Appellate Tribunal 2021 MESSRS BRONX INTERNATIONAL, KARACHI
VS
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF PC A, CUSTOM HOUSE, KARACHI AND 3 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Ss. 148 & 228Customs Act 1969 S.194-A(4) Ss.18, 26, 26A, 32(2)(3) & 202 Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005), Ss. 3, 29 (2) & 42B Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Ss.6 30, 31 & 32-Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 4 & 25 Notification SRO No.371 (I)/2002, dated 15-6-2002, Sr.3(ii) coram non judice

No official of Directorate of PCA was empowered to conduct audit in the matter of Federal Excise and Income Tax without powers / justification---Any such audit was void ab-initio and coram non judice---Clearance Collectorates did not have authority to collect Read More...


2021 PTD 51
Customs Appellate Tribunal 2021 MESSRS BRONX INTERNATIONAL, KARACHI
VS
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF PC A, CUSTOM HOUSE, KARACHI AND 3 OTHERS
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Ss.6 30, 31 & 32-Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 4 & 25 Notification SRO No.371 (I)/2002, dated 15-6-2002, Sr.3(ii) Customs Act 1969 S.194-A(4) Ss.18, 26, 26A, 32(2)(3) & 202 Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005), Ss. 3, 29 (2) & 42B Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Ss. 148 & 228 coram non judice

No official of Directorate of PCA was empowered to conduct audit in the matter of Federal Excise and Income Tax without powers / justification---Any such audit was void ab-initio and coram non judice---Clearance Collectorates did not have authority to collect Read More...


2021 PTD 51
CUSTOMS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 2021 M/S ORIENT PAK INTERNATIONAL, LAHORE
VS
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, GROUP-VI, MCC, (APPRAISEMENT-EAST). KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.162 Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 11 Customs Act 1969 Ss.18, 18A, 18C, 32, 198 & 202 Mis-declaration /Income tax and Sales tax, recovery

Show-cause notice--- Jurisdiction--Valuation Ruling (VR)---Object, purpose and scope--- Importer was aggrieved of show-cause notice issued by Deputy Collector for recovery of taxes including sales tax and income tax, on the plea of Read More...


2021 PTD 138
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2021 DR. SYED FARHAT ABBAS, ISLAMABAD
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.114 Deduction of expenses

Question before Appellate Tribunal was whether the appellant was entitled to get set off/deduction of any expenses from his professional services receipts---Appellant had rightly claimed expenses-Tax returns were lawfully filed under normal tax regime which had to Read More...


2021 PTD 157
Lahore High Court 2021 MST. FOUZIA RAZZAK
VS
FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE and others
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.140 & 138 Constitution of Pakistan, Art.4 attachment and recovery of tax amount from the Bank accounts

Right of individuals to be dealt in accordance with law---Recovery of tax out of property and through arrest of taxpayer---Recovery of tax from persons holding money on behalf of a taxpayer--Scope-Petitioners assailed order of department regarding attaching their Read More...


2021 PTD 162
2022 PTCL 391
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2021 M/s WAULAR ENGINEERING, ISLAMABAD
VS
The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.221 Rectification of mistake

Applicant sought rectification of the order passed by Appellate Tribunal on the ground that the details of payments on account of local purchases were over- sighted during the course of hearing of main appeal--Once the appellant had submitted the details of local Read More...


2021 PTD 166
Lahore High Court 2021 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, MULTAN ZONE
VS
FALAH UD DIN QURESHI
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S.111 Unexplained income or assets/ Separate Notice

Non issuance of separate notice under S.111 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and failure to confront the taxpayer with the proposed addition in order to require him to explain his position before making addition in his income is Read More...


2021 PTD 192
(2021) 124 TAX 609
2021 PTCL 607
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2021 AZHAR SADIQ CH. ISLAMABAD
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.111(1), 122(1) & 214-C Unexplained gross inflow/selection for audit

Unexplained gross inflow-Proof-Taxpayer was aggrieved of selection of his case for audit as his declared income was not accepted by authorities-- Validity---Deposits in question were explained but on the other hand were not subtracted from the total amount Read More...


2021 PTD 184
Sindh High Court 2021 THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION CUSTOMS, KARACHI
VS
THE SPECIAL JUDGE (CUSTOMS, TAXATION AND ANTI-SMUGGLING) KARACHI AND 20 OTHERS
Interpretation of statutes Literal rule and grammatical construction Applicability

Literal rule and grammatical construction Applicability---Judge, according to literal rule, must rely on exact wording of statute while describing the law Judge can deviate from such rule only when grammatical construction of statute gives some absurd meaning and it Read More...


2021 PTD 195
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2021 MESSRS SHAHID GUL AND PARTNERS
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AUDIT-V, RTO, PESHAWAR
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 20 & 21 Income from business/ Deductible expenses

Income from business---Deductible expenses---Burden of proof-Scope---Right has been vested in the taxpayer to claim deductible expenses for the purposes of computing his income---Onus to dispute the said expense, so claimed by a Read More...


2021 PTD 299
(2021) 123 TAX 292
2021 PTCL 647
2021 SCMR 27
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2021 MESSRS SHAHID GUL AND PARTNERS
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AUDIT-V, RTO, PESHAWAR
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 20 & 21, 22 Depreciable assets

Depreciable assets Unsold improved land---Structural improvements---Deduction was allowed for depreciation of the taxpayer's depreciable assets used in furtherance of his business in the said tax year--Term "depreciable assets", as explained in subsection (15) of S. Read More...


2021 PTD 299
(2021) 123 TAX 292
2021 PTCL 647
2021 SCMR 27
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2021 MESSRS SHAHID GUL AND PARTNERS
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AUDIT-V, RTO, PESHAWAR
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 20, 21(n), 22(13)(b), 22(15) & Third Sched., Pt. I Deductible expense

Deductible expenses---Scope- Depreciable assets- Unsold improved land- Structural improvements--Cost of land beneath a building-Whether the cost of land beneath a "building" would be included in determining the value of the rate of depreciation specified in the Read More...


2021 PTD 299
(2021) 123 TAX 292
2021 PTCL 647
2021 SCMR 27
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2021 MESSRS SHAHID GUL AND PARTNERS
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AUDIT-V, RTO, PESHAWAR
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 20(1), 21(n), 22(13)(b), 22(15) & Third Sched., Pt. I Sale of constructed shops/ offices on purchased land-Deductible expenses

Sale of constructed shops/offices on purchased land-Deductible expenses---Scope----Depreciable assets--Unsold improved land-Structural improvements----[Per Yahya Afridi, J (Majority view): While Read More...


2021 PTD 299
(2021) 123 TAX 292
2021 PTCL 647
2021 SCMR 27
Sindh High Court 2021 AAMEER MUSTAALY KARACHIWALLA.
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE & 3 OTHERS.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 182 & 116A. Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 Show Cause Notice under S.182

Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Show---cause notice under S.182 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 for imposition of penalty for not furnishing return of Foreign Assets and Liabilities under S.116A of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Maintainability of Read More...


2021 PTD 335
Sindh High Court 2021 AAMEER MUSTAALY KARACHIWALLA.
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE AND 3 OTHERS.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 182, 116A, 2(44) & 116. Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199, Constitutional petition Wealth statement/ Foreign income and assets statement

Wealth statement--Foreign income and assets statement---Penalty for failure to furnish foreign income and assets statement under S.116A of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Absence of prescribed format, effect of-Scope--Petitioners / taxpayers impugned show-cause notice Read More...


2021 PTD 335
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2021 M/S M. SHAH MUHAMMAD & SONS (PVT.) LTD.
VS
THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 170, 171 & 120. Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000, Ss. 10, 2(3) & 9 Refund

Issuance of income tax refunds Complaint against failure to provide taxpayer opportunity of hearing and unilateral reduction of refund amount with no compensation for delayed refund---Contention of Department was that said complaint was that not maintainable under Read More...


2021 PTD 344
Islamabad High Court 2021 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ WEALTH TAX, COMPANIES ZONE, ISLAMABAD
VS
M/S COMMUNICATION CITY (PVT.) LIMITED, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.133 & Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 50 Avoidance of Double Taxation

Deduction of tax at source--Scope-Assessee entered into different agreements with certain companies based in United Kingdom and United States and in that behalf made payments to them but no withholding tax was deducted under S.50(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More...


2021 PTD 359
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2021 M/S LIBERTY CAR PARKING (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR (IN ALL CASES)
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (EX-COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX / WEALTH TAX), LAHORE AND OTHERS
Wealth Tax Act 1963 S. 2 (18) & Civil Procedure Code 1908-VI, R.14 & O. XXIX, R. 1 Principal officer/Appeal/ Merit

Wealth Tax Appeals filed by a company without a resolution from the Board of Directors, but duly signed by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)--Sufficient compliance---Ratification of appeals--- Scope-Company was a juristic entity and it could duly authorize any Read More...


2021 PTD 379
(2021) 123 TAX 5
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2021 M/S SHAH SONS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD., MULTAN
VS
THE SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss.124 & 170. Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 Ss. 10, 2(3) & 9 Refunds

Issuance of income tax refunds---Assessment giving effect to an order---Complaint against failure of Department in giving effect to order of Appellate Tribunal whereby complainant / taxpayer was held entitled to tax refund---Validity---Department stated that after Read More...


2021 PTD 416
Sindh High Court 2021 INDUS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICER
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 199 Alternate remedy

Art. 199-Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court-Tax matters-Show-cause notice(s) seeking recovery of tax-- Alternate remedy--- Scope When revenue authority had already interpreted relevant provisions making statutory remedies illusory; and where petitioners Read More...


2021 PTD 460
Sindh High Court 2021 INDUS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICER
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS
Interpretation of statutes Fiscal statute

Fiscal statute---Construction of-Scope-Fiscal statute is to be strictly construed. Amendment in statutory provisions--Use and effect of word "substitute"---Scope--Term substitute may be defined as "taking place of another and it may be employed to signify Read More...


2021 PTD 460
Sindh High Court 2021 INDUS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICER
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 37A, Division VII of Part I of First Schedule. Finance Act (XXIX of 2016), S.5 Capital gains on disposal of securities

Capital gains on disposal of securities Amendment in rates of tax on capital gains on disposal of securities vide Finance Act, 2016 -Scope- Petitioners impugned show-cause notices issued to them regarding payment of tax on capital gains, inter alia, on ground that Read More...


2021 PTD 460
Sindh High Court 2021 INDUS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICER
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 37A, Division VII of Part I of First Schedule. Finance Act (XXIX of 2016), S.5 Capital gains on disposal of securities

Capital gains on disposal of securities Amendment in rates of tax on capital gains on disposal of securities vide Finance Act, 2016 Retrospective effect of such amendment--- Scope---Question before High Court was whether benefit of amendment in rates of tax on Read More...


2021 PTD 460
Lahore High Court 2021 Nestle Pakistan Ltd. Through Senior Manager Legal and Another
VS
Federation Of Pakistan Through Secretary Ministry of Law And 6 Others
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 230, 208 & 209. SRO No.115(1)/2015 dated 09.02.2015 Functions and Powers of DG I&I

Directorate General (Intelligence and Investigation), Inland Revenue ("DG I&I"), functions and powers of---Conferment of powers to officers of DG I&I without specifying functions and jurisdiction of DG I&I Scope-Petitioners impugned SRO No.115(1)/2015 Read More...


2021 PTD 521
| (2021)123 TAX 96
Sindh High Court 2021 SINDH CLUB KARACHI
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SOUTH ZONE, KARACHI
Income Tax Act of 1922 S. 9 & 10 Members club (social club)/ Tax payable

Members club (social club)---Tax payable---Levy of income tax on income generated from accommodation services provided by a members’ Read More...


2021 PTD 658
Lahore High Court 2021 CRESCENT TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 S. 209(8A) Jurisdiction of Income Tax Authorities

Change of taxing jurisdiction---Scope---Petitioners impugned orders whereby their taxing jurisdiction was changed from Regional Tax Office (RTO) to the Large Taxpayers Office (LTO) at another city, on the ground that orders were made without jurisdiction and were Read More...


2021 PTD 689
| (2021) 123 TAX 346
| 2021 PTCL 39
Peshawar High Court 2021 GUL AYAZ PLASTIC INDUSTRY
VS
TRIBAL AREAS ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, WAPDA HOUSE THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND 6 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.13(2)(A) & 159. Sales Tax Act (VII OF 1990), Ss.3 & 13 (2)(a). Notifications SRO No. 1212(I)/2018 dated 5-10-2018 Advance Income Tax and Sales Tax

Recovery through electricity bills---Exemption---Petitioner (located in Federal Tribal Areas) was aggrieved of demand of authorities for collection of advance income tax and sales tax from petitioner through monthly electricity bills---Validity---Through Read More...


2021 PTD 795
Sindh High Court 2021 M/S STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, COS. III, KARACHI AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 156, 80D & 136 Rectification of mistake

Rectification of mistake---Scope and amplitude of rectification powers available with Department under S.156 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Mistake apparent on record not requiring any further evidence / investigation---Imposition of minimum tax on Read More...


2021 PTD 913
Sindh High Court 2021 M/S STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, COS. III, KARACHI AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 156, 80D & 136 Minimum tax on income of certain persons

State-owned Insurance Corporation---Special provisions for computation of income tax upon profits and gains of business of insurance under S.26 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Imposition of minimum tax under S.80D of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 on Read More...


2021 PTD 913
Sindh High Court 2021 SAPPHIRE TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED THROUGH COMPANY SECRETARY
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION AND EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN, FBR, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 5A. Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 73. Companies Act 2017, Ss. 240 & 243 Money Bill

Money Bill---Scope---Bypass of regular Legislative process by unmerited recourse to Money Bills-Tax on undistributed profits of public limited companies---Section 5A of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, vires of---Petitioner’s impugned S.5A of Income Tax Ordinance, Read More...


2021 PTD 971
| (2021) 124 TAX 589
| 2021 PTCL 468
Islamabad High Court 2021 MESSRS ATTOCK GEN LTD. REFINERY, P.O. MORGAH, RAWALPINDI THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE
VS
CHIEF COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, RAWALPINDI AND 2 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 Ss.120 & 177 Audit, selection for/ Opportunity before selection

Principle---Taxpayer assailed selection of its case for audit under S.177 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Plea raised by taxpayer was that no opportunity was afforded before selecting its case for audit---Validity---Taxpayer was communicated by Commissioner Audit, Read More...


2021 PTD 1088
| (2022) 125 TAX 473
| 2021 PTCL 600
Lahore High Court 2021 MAJEED FABRICS (PVT) LTD AND 36 OTHERS
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF ENERGY (POWER DIVISION), ISLAMABAD AND 6 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 159, 235 & Second Sched. Part-IV, Cl.66 Exemption

Expression ‘unless there is in force a certificate issued under subsection (1) of S.159 relating to the collection  or deduction of such tax,---Exemption or lower rate certificate---Applicability---Appellants-taxpayers claimed that they were registered Read More...


2021 PTD 1136
| (2021) 124 TAX 223
| 2021 LHC 961
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2021 MUHAMMAD YOUNAS
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, SIALKOT
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 Ss. 111 & 122 Unexplained income or assets

Amendment of assessments---Mandatory show-cause notice and opportunity for taxpayer to file reply to same---Credit entries in Bank accounts(s) of taxpayer---Computation of “net income’ / “total income” chargeable to tax---Obligation of Read More...


2021 PTD 1223
| (2022) 125 TAX 166
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2021 MUHAMMAD YOUNAS
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, SIALKOT
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX OF 2001) Ss. 111 & 39. Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979), Ss.13 & 30 Unexplained income or assets

Unexplained income and assets---Nature of S.111 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Charging to tax of unexplained income or assets under head of “income from other sources”---Legislative lapse in non-inclusion of “unexplained income or assets Read More...


2021 PTD 1223
| (2022) 125 TAX 166
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2020 MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS
CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 Section: 24A Tax by a legislative act authority

17). Before parting with this judgment we may observe that: No tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law. A tax can only be imposed by a legislative Act and not on executive order. It thus embodies the democratic Read More...


2020 PTD 1045
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2020 MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS
CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 Section: 24A Adverse Action

For taking any adverse action, affording of an opportunity is prerequisite. An order affecting the rights of a party cannot be passed without an opportunity of hearing to that party. There are certain basic norms of justice. One of the Read More...


2020 PTD 1045
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2020 MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS
CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 Section: 24A Show Cause Notice

The Hon’ble Lahore High Court in the judgment reported as 2013 PTD 1536  PLD 2013 Lah. 634 where their lordship observed as under:“Show cause notice is not a casual correspondence or a tool or license to commence a Read More...


2020 PTD 1045
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2020 MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS
CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 Section: 24A Due Process of Law

The “fair trial” and “due process of law” as has been guaranteed by the Article 10-A of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The fair trial consists issuance of notice by the competent authority and Read More...


2020 PTD 1045
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2020 MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS
CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 Section: 24A Fair Trial

The “fair trial” and “due process of law” as has been guaranteed by the Article 10-A of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The fair trial consists issuance of notice by the competent authority and Read More...


2020 PTD 1045
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2020 MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS
CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 S 24A Audi Alterm Partem

Audi alteram partem - Principle of - We are, therefore, of the considered opinion that the impugned order was passed without providing/affording opportunity of being heard, hence violated the well know principle of “audi alteram Read More...


2020 PTD 1045
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2020 MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS
CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 S 24A Right of access to justice

Right of access to justice - An order affecting the rights of a party cannot be passed without an opportunity of heaving to that party. There are certain basic norms of justice. One of the cardinal principles of such basic norms is that Read More...


2020 PTD 1045
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2020 MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS
CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 S 24A Deemed assessment

ACIR passed orders for the amendment of deemed assessment u/s 120 of Ordinance without service of mandatory notice.Passing of order in haste with malafide intention of the officer - The above observations of the ADC-IR clearly depicts Read More...


2020 PTD 1045
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2020 MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS
CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 S 24A Malafide Intention

ACIR passed orders for the amendment of deemed assessment u/s 120 of Ordinance without service of mandatory notice.Passing of order in haste with malafide intention of the officer - The above observations of the ADC-IR clearly depicts Read More...


2020 PTD 1045
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2020 MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS
CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 S 24A Mandatory notice

ACIR passed orders for the amendment of deemed assessment u/s 120 of Ordinance without service of mandatory notice.Passing of order in haste with malafide intention of the officer - The above observations of the ADC-IR clearly depicts Read More...


2020 PTD 1045
Lahore High Court 2020 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
/S PUNJAB POULTRY FEED (PVT.) LTD.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 133, 133(5) ITO 1979 S 50, 62 Opportunity of hearing

The questions of Law involved in the cases arisen out of liability being enforced by the Revenue have not been attended to and dilated upon by the Appellate Tribunal.” These appeals are remanded to learned Income Tax Appellate Read More...


2020 PTD 224
Sindh High Court 2020 SCHLUMBERGER SEACO INC.
VS
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE C-12, COMPANIES-I, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S .9, 11(b), 12(3)(b), 15, 163, Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.107 Insurance Premium

In view of the definition, it is admitted position that both the insurance companies are non-resident companies and having no permanent establishment in Pakistan, as per the definition in the aforementioned articles of the referred treaties. Both the insurance Read More...


2020 PTD 386
Sindh High Court 2020 SCHLUMBERGER SEACO INC.
VS
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE C-12, COMPANIES-I, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.9, 11(b), 12(3)(b), 15, 163, Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.107 Avoidance of double taxation

In view of the definition, it is admitted position that both the insurance companies are non-resident companies and having no permanent establishment in Pakistan, as per the definition in the aforementioned articles of the referred Read More...


2020 PTD 386
Islamabad High Court 2020 MESSRS HONGKONG HUIHUA GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY LTD.
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, REVENUE DIVISION AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)(c), 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) Deduction of Income Tax

Petitioner was an international company having its permanent office in Pakistan and was awarded a contract for which supplies and services were sought from both foreign and domestic sources- Petitioner sought issuance of tax exemption Read More...


2020 PTD 7
Islamabad High Court 2020 MESSRS HONGKONG HUIHUA GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY LTD.
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, REVENUE DIVISION AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)(c), 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) Pakistan source Income

Petitioner was an international company having its permanent office in Pakistan and was awarded a contract for which supplies and services were sought from both foreign and domestic sources- Petitioner sought issuance of tax exemption Read More...


2020 PTD 7
Islamabad High Court 2020 M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) Writ jurisdiction

In case titled The Secretary, Ministry of Defence and others v. Prabhash Chandra Mirdha (AIR 2012 S.C. 2250) it has been held as under: “Ordinarily a writ application does not lie against a charge sheet or show-cause notice for the Read More...


2020 PTD 110
Islamabad High Court 2020 M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) Show Cause Notice/Petition

In case titled M/s. Siemens Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra and others (2006) 12 SCC 33 it has been held as under: ‘’Although ordinarily a writ Court may not exercise its discretionary jurisdiction in entertaining a writ Read More...


2020 PTD 110
Islamabad High Court 2020 M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) Petition against Show Cause

In case titled M/s. Siemens Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra and others (2006) 12 SCC 33 it has been held as under: ‘’Although ordinarily a writ Court may not exercise its discretionary jurisdiction in entertaining a writ Read More...


2020 PTD 110
Islamabad High Court 2020 M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) Petition against Show Cause

In another case titled State of Uttar Pradesh v. Brahma Datt Sharma and others (AIR 1987 SC 943 = 1987 SCR (2) 444) it has been held as follows: “The High Court was not justified in quashing the show-cause notice. When a show-cause Read More...


2020 PTD 110
Islamabad High Court 2020 M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) Show Cause Notice

In another case titled State of Uttar Pradesh v. Brahma Datt Sharma and others (AIR 1987 SC 943 = 1987 SCR (2) 444) it has been held as follows: “The High Court was not justified in quashing the show-cause notice. When a show-cause Read More...


2020 PTD 110
Islamabad High Court 2020 M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) Show Cause Notice/Petition

In light of the above principles, what needs to be examined is whether the instant petitions are maintainable. The sole ground agitated by the petitioner is that since the question involved and/ or raised in the impugned notices is Read More...


2020 PTD 110
Sindh High Court 2020 M/S. A.F. FERGUSON & CO. & OTHERS
VS
PAKISTAN & OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(10), 2(26), 32, 80, 80(2), 92, 92(1) 92(2), 92(3), 92(4), 92(5), 93 Taxation of association

Principles of taxation of association of persons - Filing of individual returns of income by the partners of firm of their total income - Amount received by a partner from the firm in hand of partner - Exemption - Firm and its partners - Read More...


2020 PTD 27
Lahore High Court 2020 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
GRAYS LEASING LTD., LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S: 133, 133(5) Law: Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S: 12(19), 62 Law: Income Tax Rules, 1982 S: 8(5)(j) (a) Security Deposits

Undeniably respondent-taxpayer recorded the lease key money as liability to be adjusted as a sale proceeds at the expiry of lease period, therefore, there is no justification to tax the security deposit under Section 12(19), considering Read More...


2020 PTD 153
Lahore High Court 2020 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
GRAYS LEASING LTD., LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S: 133, 133(5) Law: Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sec: 12(19), 62 Law: Income Tax Rules, 1982 S: 8(5)(j) (a) Lease Key Money

Undeniably respondent-taxpayer recorded the lease key money as liability to be adjusted as a sale proceeds at the expiry of lease period, therefore, there is no justification to tax the security deposit under Section 12(19), considering Read More...


2020 PTD 153
Sindh High Court 2020 THE COMMISSIONER (LEGAL), INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, HYDERABAD
VS
MESSRS FATEH TEXTILE MILLS LTD.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 10, 11 & 21 Black Listed or deregistered

It is the contention of counsel for the applicant Department that as the invoices issued from those sellers, who were subsequently declared as blacklisted or de-registered; therefore, no refund can be allowed to the respondent. In Read More...


2020 PTD 203
Sindh High Court 2020 THE COMMISSIONER (LEGAL), INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, HYDERABAD
VS
MESSRS FATEH TEXTILE MILLS LTD.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 10, 11 & 21 Flying Invoices

It is the contention of counsel for the applicant Department that as the invoices issued from those sellers, who were subsequently declared as blacklisted or de-registered; therefore, no refund can be allowed to the respondent. In Read More...


2020 PTD 203
Sindh High Court 2020 THE COMMISSIONER (LEGAL), INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, HYDERABAD
VS
MESSRS FATEH TEXTILE MILLS LTD.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 10, 11 & 21 Pecuniary jurisdiction

So far as the Question No. 1 is concerned, the same pertains to pecuniary jurisdiction of the officer, who has passed Order-in-Original. In a case involving contravention on the part of a registered person with respect of assessment of Read More...


2020 PTD 203
Lahore High Court 2020 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
Messrs GREENVELLY PREMIUM SUPER MARKET (PVT.) LTD.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.122, 132, 131 & 133 Addition deleted

FACTS: the respondent is running the business of departmental stores. The respondent e filed return of income by declaring loss of Rs.15,734,624/- for tax year 20l4. Respondent selected for audit, deemed assessment was amended under Read More...


2020 PTD 260
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2020 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL) REGIONAL TAX OFFICER, PESHAWAR
VS
SAFEER JAN
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 12(18), 13(aa) Gift deeds

Whether gift amounts received by one partner from other partners in the firm/AOP could be added by the tax officer under S. 12(18) of the erstwhile Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Held, that plain reading of S. 12(18) of the Ordinance Read More...


2020 PTD 278
Lahore High Court 2020 D.G.KHAN CEMENT CO. LTD. ETC.
VS
FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE ETC.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 174, 173(3), 177 Maintenance of Record

Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)- Ss. 174(3) & proviso- Records, information collection and audit- Maintenance of record by taxpayer- Statutorily required time-period for maintenance of such record- Maintenance of record after lapse of statutorily required Read More...


2020 PTD 2111
(2021)123 TAX 361
2021 PTCL 130
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2020 SHAKIR ALI RAJPUT
VS
The SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114, 115(3)(b), 115(3)(d), 231-A, 236-P Resident/Overseas Pakistani are exempt of filing of income tax return

Complainant was a Non-Resident/Overseas Pakistani who was aggrieved of deduction of tax on his remittances exceeding fifty thousand rupees.

The Complainant, who was Non-Resident working abroad and who Read More...


2020 PTD 642
Sindh High Court 2020 SHEHARYAR AHMED
VS
THE STATE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 148 Import of a vehicle under a fake Proceed Realization Certificate (PRC)/ Grant of Bail

Import of a vehicle under a fake Proceed Realization Certificate (PRC)---Allegedly, accused, Clearing Agent, was an instrumental in the entire rip-off for illegally importing a vehicle with intention to cause loss to Read More...


2020 PTD 645
Sindh High Court 2020 SCHLUMBERGER SEACO INC.
VS
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE C-12, COMPANIES-I, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 9, 11(b), 12(3)(b), 15, 163 Premium Paid to Non-Resident Companies

In view of the definition, it is admitted position that both the insurance companies are non-resident companies and having no permanent establishment in Read More...


2020 PTD 386
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2020 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL) REGIONAL TAX OFFICER, PESHAWAR
VS
SAFEER JAN
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 12(18), 13(aa) Cash Withdrawal from Share of AOP

8. A plain reading of section 12(18) of the Ordinance shows that the said provision is attracted when loans, advances, and gifts are received in cash. However, Read More...


2020 PTD 278
Sindh High Court 2020 M/S BAWANY SUGAR MILLS LIMITED THROUGH SENIOR MANAGER TAXATION
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE AND 4 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 131, 132 Bank accounts had been frozen, which offended in Constitutionally protected fundamental right

Petitioner / taxpayer sought direction of High Court under Constitutional jurisdiction to set aside order of Appellate Tribunal whereby taxpayer’s application under O.XXXIX Rr. 1 & 2, C.P.C was rejected---Contention of Read More...


2020 PTD 696
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2020 MUHAMMAD HANIF
VS
THE CIR, RTO, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 153(1)(a), 115(4), 120(1), 122, 153, 153(7), 221, 221(4) Rectification of mistake---Limitation

Taxpayer filed normal returns for the tax year 2013 which was deemed to have been assessed under S. 120(1), ITO 2001---Assessing authority observed that the taxpayer was engaged in the business of supply of medicines, therefore, normal Read More...


2020 PTD 698
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2020 MUHAMMAD HANIF
VS
THE CIR, RTO, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 153(1)(a), 115(4), 120(1), 122, 153, 153(7), 221, 221(4) Invoking the provisions of S.122(5) without any material

Taxpayer himself had declared income under normal tax regime as well as under final tax regime which stood subjected to withholding provisions of 153(1)(a) of ITO 2001---Assessing authority without any basis presumed that all sales were Read More...


2020 PTD 698
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2020 MUHAMMAD HANIF
VS
THE CIR, RTO, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 153(1)(a), 115(4), 120(1), 122, 153, 153(7), 221, 221(4) Rectification of mistake/Error apparent from the record/ two views or opinions/ Limitation

Application of S. 221 ITO 2001 is only permissible if the error is apparent, Read More...


2020 PTD 698
Customs Appellate Tribunal 2020 MESSRS K.B. CORPORATION AND ANOTHER
VS
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, KARACHI AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 140, 148, 162, 162(1), 228 invocation of erroneous sections of law/ Collection of tax at import stage

Section 33, ST Act, 1990 contains penal clauses and can only be invoked for contravention of respective provisions of ST Act, 1990---Section 148 ITO  2001 prescribes the procedure for collection of income tax at import stage by the Read More...


2020 PTD 713
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2020 MUSHARAF GULZAR AND OTHERS
VS
COMMISSIONER IR, RTO, RAWALPINDI AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111(1)(b), 182 Documents in custody/ Burden of proof/Penalty

Penalty, imposition of---Taxpayer was aggrieved of confirmation of additions to value of property as well as foreign remittances made by the authorities.
Stance of taxpayer was not properly adjudicated as required under Read More...


2020 PTD 733
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2020 MUSHARAF GULZAR AND OTHERS
VS
COMMISSIONER IR, RTO, RAWALPINDI AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111(1)(b), 182 Administration of justice

Principle of consistency---Object, purpose and scope---Object of principle of consistency is to maintain uniformity and consistency of views/decisions in different Benches of Court/Tribunal and is aimed at to foster, develop and Read More...


2020 PTD 733
Lahore High Court 2020 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
M/S RASHID AND SAQIB TRADING COMPANY
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133, 221 Expression "mistake apparent from the record

Where rectification application dismissed by Appellate Tribunal, the Reference application before Court is not maintainable because the order of the Tribunal on application does not merge into final order--- Where the rectification Read More...


2020 PTD 782
Lahore High Court 2020 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL) RTO, ABBOTTABAD
VS
ED-ZUBLIN AG GERMANY and another
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133, 221 Review petition filed against (tax) Reference decided by the High Court

Review petition filed against (tax) Reference decided by the High Court-Power of High Court to convert review petition into an application for correction of clerical error---Scope---In the exercise of its Reference jurisdiction under S. Read More...


2020 PTD 782
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2020 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL) RTO, ABBOTTABAD
VS
ED-ZUBLIN AG GERMANY and another
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133 Conversion of one type of proceedings into another

Conversion of one type of proceedings into another---No fetters or bar could be placed on the High Court and or the Supreme Court to convert and treat one type of proceedings into another Read More...


2020 PTD 785
Lahore High Court 2020 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
M/S FORMANITE HOUSING SCHEME, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1)(b), 120(1), 122(9), 133 Unexplained income or assets---Findings of fact

Taxpayer's declaration of its income was disputed by the Taxation Officer while placing reliance on the deposits made in the Bank accounts maintained by the taxpayer, on the basis whereof show- cause notice was issued which culminated in Read More...


2020 PTD 799
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2020 MESSRS ELITE ESTATE (PVT.) LTD
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 152 Payment for consultancy/technical services provided by foreign non-resident company

Payment for consultancy/technical services provided by foreign non-resident company---Exemption from deduction of withholding tax---In terms the consultancy agreement executed between the parties, the foreign company was to provide Read More...


2020 PTD 802
Sindh High Court 2020 BANK ALFALAH LIMITED
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION AND 4 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 176, 176(1)(a) Income tax authorities had vast powers in respect of getting information

Privileged information---Fishing inquiry--- Petitioner Bank assailed notice issued by income tax authorities regarding providing of details in connection with debit/credit card machines installed by petitioner to different commercial Read More...


2020 PTD 827
Lahore High Court 2020 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
MESSRS DESCON ENGINEERING LIMITED, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 88a, 103, 122(5A), 122(9), 133, 133(1) Share profits of company to be added to taxable income

Findings of facts---Scope---Dept. assailed order passed by Appellate Tribunal on the ground that it ignored the provisions of S.88A of ITO 2001 while holding that share from Association of Persons (AOP) was not liable to be charged in Read More...


2020 PTD 873
Lahore High Court 2020 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE
VS
EMCO INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 34(5), 122(5A), 133, 133(5) Reference to High Court

Scope only substantial legal questions can be examined which may arise from an order passed by the Appellate Tribunal whereas questions requiring no interpretation of any provision of law, rules or regulations or its application on Read More...


2020 PTD 904
Lahore High Court 2020 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, LAHORE
VS
M/s. GHANI GLASS LIMITED
income Tax Ordinance 2001 221 Rectification of mistake/ judgment announced beyond 120 days became nullity in the eyes of law

Dept. assailed order passed by Appellate Tribunal whereby it had re-fixed the case for hearing and adjudication despite the fact that it had already decided the appeal. 

The Appellate Tribunal Read More...


2020 PTD 937
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2020 M/S. HONDA PALACE, HYDERABAD
VS
THE CIR WIIT ZONE, RTO, HYDERABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 153(7), 165(5), 182, 182(1)(1A)(2) Failure to furnish statement---No revenue loss

Appellant assailed orders passed by Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue whereby he had charged penalty under serial No. (1A) of S. 182(1) ITO 2001 for delay in filing statements under S. 165 ITO 2001--- Contentions of appellant were that Read More...


2020 PTD 940
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2020 M/S. HONDA PALACE, HYDERABAD
VS
THE CIR WIIT ZONE, RTO, HYDERABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 153(7), 165(5), 182, 182(1)(1A)(2) penalty would be leviable when there is a tax payable/ Failure to furnish statement

Section 182,  ITO 2001is not a charging section, rather it is penal in nature---Intention of legislature in enacting S.182 is not to generate revenue---Section 182 cannot be used as a source of resource mobilization or collecting Read More...


2020 PTD 940
Lahore High Court 2020 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
MESSRS Z&J HYGIENIC PRODUCTS (PVT.) LTD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133, 133(5), Clause 45 of Part IV of the Second Schedule HS Code of textile articles

Reasons for decision---Scope---Dept. assailed order passed by Appellate Tribunal whereby it had remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals)---Appellate Tribunal had not determined the core issue whether HS Code of diaper was Read More...


2020 PTD 948
Lahore High Court 2020 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
ASHRAF SUGAR MILLS LIMITED
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 21(l), 60A, 122, 122(1), 122(5), 122(9), 133, 133(5), 174(2) Reduction of a taxpayer’s claim for deduction

Reduction of a taxpayer’s claim for deduction. Worker’s Welfare Fund. Reference to High Court. Findings of facts. Scope Applicant-Dept. assailed the order of Appellate Tribunal wherein it had given findings of facts that the Read More...


2020 PTD 962
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2020 The Secretary, Revenue Division Islamabad/STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN KARACHI
VS
NONE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114 Return of Income for non-residents/ foreign currency account

Return of Income for non-residents. Suo motu investigation against systemic maladministration by Dept. as non-residents were being required to file return of income by Banks before opening a foreign currency account. Scope. Federal Tax Read More...


2020 PTD 966
Lahore High Court 2020 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
MESSRS MALIK USMAN
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 13(1)(aa), 111, 111(1)(a), 111(1)(b), 122(1), 122(5), 133, 133(5) ORDER

Findings of facts. Scope. Applicant-Dept. assailed the order of Appellate Tribunal wherein it had given findings of facts that the assessing authority had treated the credit entries appearing in the Bank accounts as business Read More...


2020 PTD 968
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2020 MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS
CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120, 122(1)(5A), 122(9) Amendment of assessment. Condemned unheard

Appellant attacked the order-in-original on the ground that mandatory show-cause notice was posted one day after the date fixed for appearance of appellant. 

Section 122 of ITO, 2001provided that Read More...


2020 PTD 1045
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2020 MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS
CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120, 122(1)(5A), 122(9) Appellant attacked the order-in-original on the ground that mandatory show-cause notice was posted one day after the date fixed for appearance of appe

Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 10-A, Amendment of assessment. Right of fair trial. Opportunity of being heard. Scope Fair trial and due process of law are guaranteed by the Constitution. Fair trial means issuance of notice by the Read More...


2020 PTD 1045
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2020 MUHAMMAD SHABBIR
VS
THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114(1), 120, 170, 170(4), 171, 171(2)(c), 235 Delay in issuance of refunds.

Delay in issuance of refunds. Scope. Complaint against non-issuance of refund and for compensation under Ss. 170 and 171 of the ITO 2001. Complaint sought findings against Dept. for inordinate delay in issuance of refund on account of Read More...


2020 PTD 1057
Peshawar High Court 2020 M/s. IKRAM ULLAH ASSOCIATES thorugh directos and 8 others
VS
GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Cheif Secretary at Secretariat Peshawar and 17 others
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(29), 148, 150, 152(1), 153, 154, 156, 156A, 159, 233, 233A, 234(5) Exemption from Income Tax/ Applicability

Petitioners were permanent residents of erstwhile provincially Administered Tribal Areas (PATA) and they were aggrieved of deduction of advance income tax by Provincial Government from their work bills and they were asked to seek Read More...


2020 PTD 1060
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2020 CITY SUPER STORE-II, ISLAMABAD
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114(3), 114(4), 120, 120(3), 120(4), 121, 177 Best judgment assessment

Taxpayer assailed orders passed by Assessing Officer and Commissioner (Appeals) whereby they had made additions in his declared income.

Taxpayer, at first, was issued notice under S. 177 of the ITO Read More...


2020 PTD 1084
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2020 CITY SUPER STORE-II, ISLAMABAD
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114(3), 114(4), 120, 120(3), 120(4), 121, 177 Administration of Justice

Where the statute requires a particular act to be done in a particular manner then the act must be performed in that manner alone and all other manners of doing that act would not be permissible under the Read More...


2020 PTD 1084
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2020 SHAKIR ALI RAJPUT
VS
The SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114, 115(3)(b), 115(3)(d), 231-A, 236-P Cash withdrawal

The complainant, an overseas Pakistani/non-resident (NR) is working in Saudi Arabia. According to the complainant, he remits money from abroad through proper banking channel. However, at the time of withdrawal, the Bank deducts tax when the transaction exceeds fifty Read More...


2020 PTD 642
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2020 MESSRS ZAK RE-ROLLING MILLS (PVT.) LTD.
VS
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE AND OTHERS
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3(1A), 47 Capital Value Tax

10). Read More...


2020 PTD 382
(2020) 121 TAX 201
2020 SCMR 131
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 MESSRS GHANI GLASS LIMITED, LAHORE
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, L.T.U., LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 131 Applications for recalling of order passed by Appellate Tribunal

Applications for recalling of order passed by Appellate Tribunal-Taxpayer had sought recalling of order earlier passed by Appellate Tribunal; wherein dept.al appeals were accepted and order passed by Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) was reversed- Grievance of Read More...


2019 PTD 1162
Islamabad High Court 2019 HUB POWER CO. LIMITED
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Ss. 14, 136 & Second Sched., Part I Item 76-A Exemption from total income

Special exemptions for Power Company-Interest or profit derived on deposits--Scope---Question before the High Court was whether "term deposits" held with Banks by Power Company fell within the purview of the exemption provided for in Item 76-A of Part-1 of the Read More...


2019 PTD 1187
Islamabad High Court 2019 HUB POWER CO. LIMITED
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD
Interpretation of Statues Words “and” & “or”---

-Words “and” & “or”---Statutory construction---Words “and” & “or” were interchangeable and the word  “and” could be construed as “or” and vice versa; if such change was necessary to Read More...


2019 PTD 1187
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2019 SAJJAD AHMED
VS
The SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 Ss. 2(3)(b)(ii), 9(2)(b) & 10(1)--- Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 114(1), 127 & 170(4) & (5) Refund of tax amount/ delay in

Refund of tax amount, delay in-Taxpayer was aggrieved of delay in process of his tax refund- Indeed--Objections raised under S.9(2)(b) of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 was misconceived as taxpayer had already availed legal remedy of appeal for non-passing of Read More...


2019 PTD 1198
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2019 INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES KARACHI
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-V, RTO II, KARACHI
Statutes Inherent jurisdiction/ Administration of justice

Inherent jurisdiction--Applicability-Principle-Statutes normally do not provide for each and every conceivable eventuality---Court, in respect of some unforeseen events arising in any case for which no provision has been made, are deemed to have inherent Read More...


2019 PTD 1201
Peshawar High Court 2019 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, PESHAWAR
VS
M/s. PAKISTAN MINERAL WATER BOTTLING (PVT.) LIMITED, SWABI
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 133, 122 & 120 Amendment of assessment---Show-cause notice to taxpayer-

Amendment of assessment---Show-cause notice to taxpayer-Reference to High Court-Jurisdiction of High Court under S. 133 of the ITO, 2001---Scope---Grounds for amendment of assessment of taxpayer --Addition of new ground/ allegation for amendment of assessment at Read More...


2019 PTD 1219
Peshawar High Court 2019 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, PESHAWAR
VS
M/s. PAKISTAN MINERAL WATER BOTTLING (PVT.) LIMITED, SWABI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 133 & 132 Jurisdiction of High Court under S. 133

Jurisdiction of High Court under S. 133 of the ITO, 2001---Questions of law Scope-Under S. 133 of the ITO, 2001 High Court had jurisdiction to decide any question of law arising out of an order of the Appellate Tribunal even if such matter had not been argued or Read More...


2019 PTD 1219
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2019 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PESHAWAR
VS
DIRECTOR GENERAL, NWFP EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2(24), 20, 23, 2nd Schedule, Pt. I, Cl. 62(1) Taxable income/ Contributions made by employers

Taxable income”-----Scope----Contributions made by employers to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Employees Social Security Institution (“the Institution”)---Term ‘income’ used in S. 2(24) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was of the widest Read More...


2019 PTD 928
(2019)119 TAX 359
2019 PTCL 102
2019 SCMR 439
Peshawar High Court 2019 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, PESHAWAR
VS
M/s. PAKISTAN MINERAL WATER BOTTLING (PVT.) LIMITED, SWABI
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 131 & 140 Recovery in disregard to stay order granted by Appellate Tribunal

Assessing Officer, disregarding the stay granted by Appellate Tribunal, made recovery from the taxpayer---Taxpayer filed application against said recovery, being illegal, high handed tantamounted to contempt of court--- Dept.al representative regretted the recovery Read More...


2019 PTD 1219
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2019 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PESHAWAR
VS
DIRECTOR GENERAL, NWFP EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2(24), 20, 23, 2nd Schedule, Pt. I, Cl. 62(1) Taxable income/ Contributions made by employers to social security

Taxable income---Exemption-----Contributions made by employers to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Employees Social Security Institution (“the Institution”)----Whether income received by the Institution in the form of contributions was Read More...


2019 PTD 928
(2019)119 TAX 359
2019 PTCL 102
2019 SCMR 439
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2019 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PESHAWAR
VS
DIRECTOR GENERAL, NWFP EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2(24), 20, 23, 2nd Schedule, Pt. I, Cl. 62(1) Taxable income-Exemption- Retrospective effect

Contributions made by employers to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Employees Social Security Institution----Tax assessment year falling under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 (“the 1979 Ordinance”)----Plea that benefit of exemption from tax Read More...


2019 PTD 928
(2019)119 TAX 359
2019 PTCL 102
2019 SCMR 439
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 M/S ASEAN INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ROAD NORTH I-8/2, ISLAMABAD
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 124 & 152 Framing of fresh assessment on remand of case

Framing of fresh assessment on remand of case---Taxpayer, who filed income tax returns allegedly failed to discharge his responsibilities under the law to act as withholding agent---Show-cause notice issued to taxpayer—Tax payer filed reply, which was not Read More...


2019 PTD 1235
Islamabad High Court 2019 MESSRS THE ATTOCK OIL CO. LTd
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHER
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 4B,2(63) Super tax for rehabilitation of temporarily displaced persons

Super tax for rehabilitation of temporarily displaced persons----Tax to be levied by law only----Procedure with respect to Money Bill----Bill not deemed to be a money bill----Specific purpose of tax mentioned in the taxing Read More...


2019 PTD 934
Lahore High Court 2019 MUHAMMAD TARIQ KOMBOH
VS
THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, FINANCE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD, ETC
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 114(5) Expression completed tax year

Expression completed tax year---Scope-Expression completed tax year cannot be construed to enlarge limitation period beyond twelve months ending on 30th day of June of relevant calendar Read More...


2019 PTD 1238
Lahore High Court 2019 MUHAMMAD TARIQ KOMBOH
VS
THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, FINANCE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD, ETC
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 114(5) & 122-C Return of income---Show-cause notice/ Limitation

Taxpayer assailed show-cause notice issued by authorities on grounds that it was time barred due to conclusion of tax year well before issuance of notice---Indeed---Relevant tax year could not be considered complete, for purposes of S. 114(5) of ITO, 2001 on last Read More...


2019 PTD 1238
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 MESSRS ASEAN INTERNATIONAL ISLAMABAD
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 131, 140 Recovery in disregard to stay order granted by Appellate Tribunal

Assessing Officer, disregarding the stay granted by Appellate Tribunal, made recovery from the taxpayer---Taxpayer filed application against said recovery, being illegal, high handed tantamounted to contempt of court--- Dept.al Read More...


2019 PTD 1227
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 MESSRS ASEAN INTERNATIONAL ISLAMABAD
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 131, 140 Recovery in disregard to stay order granted by Appellate Tribunal

Assessing Officer, disregarding the stay granted by Appellate Tribunal, made recovery from the taxpayer---Taxpayer filed application against said recovery, being illegal, high handed tantamounted to contempt of court--- Dept.al Read More...


2019 PTD 1227
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., SUKKUR
VS
MESSRS MUHAMMAD RAMZAN & CO., KANDHKOT
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(64), 4(5), 8, 9, 9(5), 11, 12(2), 122(5A), 169 Taxable income---Internally Displaced Persons Tax (IDPT)

Internally Displaced Persons Tax (IDPT), imposition of---Applicability---Taxpayer was aggrieved of calculation of taxable income by assessing officer and charging Internally Displaced Persons Tax (IDPT) at 5% on tax payable---Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) Read More...


2019 PTD 1256
Sindh High Court 2019 RANA NADEEM AHMED
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL RESOURCES, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 122C & 144 Return of income--Amendment of assessment for non-furnishing of return

Amendment of assessment for non-furnishing of return---Procedure and verification by dept.--- Taxpayer impugned order passed by dept. under S. 122C of the ITO, 2001 inter alia, on the ground, that the same had been passed without taking into consideration response Read More...


2019 PTD 1264
Lahore High Court 2019 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
AMEER ABDULLAH KHAN ROKHARI
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 5.9 Chargeability of tax/ receipt was not sole test of chargeability of tax

Adjudication to determine whether tax was chargeable on receipt of revenue / fee by taxpayer--- Burden of proof---Scope---Anything which was not income could not be treated as income and receipt was not sole test of chargeability of tax--- Initial burden to show Read More...


2019 PTD 1278
Lahore High Court 2019 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
AMEER ABDULLAH KHAN ROKHARI
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Ss.22 & 133 Chargeability of income tax-Income from business or profession

Non-competition fee-Nature of receipt of non- competition fee-"Revenue receipt" and "capital receipt"--Distinction- Onus on Dept. to establish chargeability of income tax on capital receipt-Scope-Question before the High Court was whether "non- competition fee" Read More...


2019 PTD 1278
Lahore High Court 2019 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
AMEER ABDULLAH KHAN ROKHARI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133(1), 133(5) Taxing statute---Charges upon subject of a taxation

Taxing statute---Charges upon subject of a taxation statute must be imposed by clear and unambiguous language, since in some degree the same operated as penalties --Such subject was not to be taxed unless language of a statute clearly imposed such obligation and Read More...


2019 PTD 1278
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 WASHDEV
VS
The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LARKANA ZONE, R.T.O., SUKKUR
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.121(1)(d), 122 & 138(1) Tax assessment---Show-cause notice, non-compliance of-Limitation

Taxpayer was aggrieved of assessment order passed by appellate authorities for not providing record for audit by the taxpayer---Taxpayer assailed that said notice and true copy was never received by him and that such proceedings were not in his Read More...


2019 PTD 1286
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, SPECIAL RTO, MULTAN
VS
M/S ATTIQ-UR-REHMAN, MULTAN
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 177, 182(1)(8)(a), 214C Selection for audit by the Board

Failure of taxpayer to produce the record of documents on receipt of first notice-Board selected the case of taxpayer for audit of his tax affairs-Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue imposed penalty on failure of taxpayer to join audit proceedings---Commissioner Read More...


2019 PTD 1294
Sindh High Court 2019 M/S. DIAMOND METALS (AOP) THROUGH ATTORNEY
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 3 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 159(3) Exemption or lower rate certificate

Certificates issued under subsection (3) (since omitted) of S.159 of the ITO, 2001-Certificates to remain in force until rescinded by FBR despite omission of subsection (3) of S.159 of the ITO, 2001 by the Legislature--Scope-Question before High Court was whether Read More...


2019 PTD 1296
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 NIAGRA MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, FA1SALABAD
VS
C.I.R., CORPORATE ZONE, R.T.O., FAISALABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 115, 114, 122, 120, 154 & 169 Persons not required to furnish return of income

Tax collected or deducted as a final tax-Scope-Appellant filed statement in terms of S. 115(4) of ITO, 2001 declaring export receipts covered under Final Tax Regime for the years 2014 and 2015 respectively---Declared receipts were deemed to be treated as assessment Read More...


2019 PTD 1317
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 NIAGRA MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, FA1SALABAD
VS
C.I.R., CORPORATE ZONE, R.T.O., FAISALABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 169, 115, 114 & 154-- Income Tax Rules, 2002, Rr. 34 & 39- Persons not required to furnish return of income

Tax collected or deducted as a final tax-Persons not required to furnish a return of income-Return of income-Export-Statement in lieu of Return of income-Scope-Section 169(3) provided that where all the income derived by a person is subject to final taxation, he is Read More...


2019 PTD 1317
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 NIAGRA MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, FA1SALABAD
VS
C.I.R., CORPORATE ZONE, R.T.O., FAISALABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 115, 114, 169 & 120 Persons not required to furnish return of income

Tax collected or deducted as a final tax Assessments---Scope---Filing of income tax return and of statement are two different regimes and run parallel to each other and in case a person is obliged to file his statement merely in terms of S. 115(4), he stands Read More...


2019 PTD 1317
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 NIAGRA MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, FA1SALABAD
VS
C.I.R., CORPORATE ZONE, R.T.O., FAISALABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 120, 114,115, Persons not required to furnish return of income

Persons not required to furnish a return of income-Scope-Section 120 has its genesis in and relates to the filing or failure thereof of a return of income---Subsection (4) of S. 120 merely gives the Commissioner the power to issue notice to the taxpayer in case the Read More...


2019 PTD 1317
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 NIAGRA MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, FA1SALABAD
VS
C.I.R., CORPORATE ZONE, R.T.O., FAISALABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 122(5A) Amendment of assessment-Pre-conditions

Amendment of assessment-Pre-conditions-Scope- Two conditions are mandatory for invoking S. 122(5A), that the order should be erroneous in law or facts as well as prejudicial to the interest of Revenue and where one condition exists and the other is missing, Read More...


2019 PTD 1317
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 MESSRS M.F. & CO., PROP. FAISAL, KARACHI
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, R.T.O.-II, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 111 & 122 Assessment order, revision of

Assessment order, revision of--Precondition--- Assessment order is required to be amended on basis of "definite information "---Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue court invoke, 5.122(1) of ITO, 2001 for acquiring jurisdiction to amend order under S.122(4) read with Read More...


2019 PTD 1347
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 MESSRS M.F. & CO., PROP. FAISAL, KARACHI
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, R.T.O.-II, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 111(1)(b), (c) & 122- Assessment order, revision of/ Statutory notice

Statutory notice, non-issuance of---Taxpayer was engaged in import and subsequent sale of textile items--Authorities initiated proceedings under S.122(5) of ITO, 2001 against the taxpayer on the basis of information with regard to purchase of a property by Read More...


2019 PTD 1347
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2019 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE C-4, KARACHI (IN BOTH CASES)
VS
M/S NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI (IN BOTH CASES)
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 17 & 32(1) Interest earned by financial institutions on Government securities

Whether the same was liable to be taxed on accrual or on receipt basis-Hybrid' system of accounting---Scope--- Bank/assessee in the present case maintained its accounts on the accrual system but accounted for interest on Government securities on receipt basis, also Read More...


2019 PTD 1377
(2019)119 TAX 481
2019 PTCL 520
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2019 PETITIONER(S): H.M. EXTRACTION GHEE AND OIL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. AND ANOTHER
VS
RESPONDENT(S): FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 65D, 100C, 148, 159(1)(a) Refund of Advace Tax u/s 148

Learned counsel for H.M. Extraction also submitted that over the years a huge sum of money (running into several crores of rupees) had accumulated in favor of Read More...


2019 PTD 1479
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2019 PETITIONER(S): H.M. EXTRACTION GHEE AND OIL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. AND ANOTHER
VS
RESPONDENT(S): FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 65D, 100C, 148, 159(1)(a) Tax Credit u/s 65D

Learned counsel for H.M. Extraction also submitted that over the years a huge sum of money (running into several crores of rupees) had accumulated in favor of Read More...


2019 PTD 1479
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2019 PETITIONER(S): H.M. EXTRACTION GHEE AND OIL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. AND ANOTHER
VS
RESPONDENT(S): FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 65D, 100C, 148, 159(1)(a) Refund barred by Limitation

We are reminded here of what was said by this Court in Pfizer Laboratories Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others PLD 1998 SC 64 ("Pfizer case"). The facts Read More...


2019 PTD 1479
Customs Appellate Tribunal 2019 SHAFI ULLAH
VS
ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (ADJUDICATION), PESHAWAR AND 2 OTHERS
Interpretation of statutes provision of law

Every provision of law had to be interpreted so as to make the law workable and no redundancy could be attached or attributed to the provision or the legislative Read More...


2019 PTD 739
Lahore High Court 2019 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
MUHAMMAD ASLAM
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133(1) Cancellation of assessment w.r.t Time Limitation

Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case learned ITAT was justified to cancel the assessments made under section 62 for the assessment years Read More...


2019 PTCL 385
Lahore High Court 2019 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
MUHAMMAD ASLAM
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133(1) Pending Proceedings

In “Collector of Sales Tax and Central Excise, LTU, Karachi v. Messrs Pak Suzuki Co. Ltd., Karachi”(PTCL 2016 CL. 63), the Hon’ble Supreme Read More...


2019 PTCL 385
Lahore High Court 2019 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
MUHAMMAD ASLAM
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133(1) Retrospective Effect

Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case learned ITAT was justified to cancel the assessments made under section 62 for the assessment years 1986-87 to 1991-92 Read More...


2019 PTCL 385
Islamabad High Court 2019 OIL AND GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 4, 49, 49(1)(2)(3)(4), 80, 80(1) Exemption of certain public property from taxation under Art. 165 of the Constitution

Liability of income tax on statutory bodies/entities---- Benefit of exemption of levy of income on Read More...


2019 PTD 587
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 MUHAMMAD NAZIR AHMED
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 22(2), 114(4), 120, 122-C, 122(5-A), 122(5A), 172, 218(2), 218(12) Filing of return of income/Amendment of assessment

Notice under S.114(4) of the ITO, 2001 for filing of income tax return for relevant year was issued Read More...


2019 PTD 598
Islamabad High Court 2019 OIL AND GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 4, 49, 49(1)(2)(3)(4), 80, 80(1) Exemption of certain public property from taxation under Art. 165 of the Constitution

Liability of income tax on statutory bodies/entities---- Benefit of exemption of levy of income on income of Federal and Provincial Governments and local authorities under S.49 of the ITO, 2001---Scope---Question before the High Court was whether certain statutory Read More...


2019 PTD 587
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 MUHAMMAD NAZIR AHMED
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 22(2), 114(4), 120, 122-C, 122(5-A), 122(5A), 172, 218(2), 218(12) Filing of return of income/Amendment of assessment

Notice under S.114(4) of the ITO, 2001 for filing of income tax return for relevant year was issued to the taxpayer, but on due date neither anybody attended the office nor any application for adjournment was filed---Assessing authority made provisional assessment Read More...


2019 PTD 598
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE
VS
C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) Improve the case

At the same time the AR also argued that the appellant has already faced the cumbersome round of assessment at the first stance therefore, another round would have meant that the appellant would have been subjected to another round of cumbersome proceedings which is Read More...


2019 PTD 4
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE
VS
C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) Tax dept. cannot dictate taxpayers

The learned counsel by placing reliance on the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of Pakistan reported as Commissioner of Income Tax v. Pakistan Industrial Engineering Agencies Limited (1992 PTD 954), argued that the
department cannot dictate the taxpayer Read More...


2019 PTD 4
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE
VS
C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) Original action illegal, all subsequent action illegal.

The things which cannot be done directly are not capable to be done indirectly 1993 PLD SC 473, Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif v. President of Pakistan and others. Where the original action is void then the subsequent actions and proceedings there from would also be Read More...


2019 PTD 4
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE
VS
C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) coram- non-judice

If the power has been exercised on a non-consideration or non-application of mind to relevant factors, the exercise of power will be regarded as manifestly erroneous. If a power whether judicial, quasi judicial or administrative is exercised on the basis of facts Read More...


2019 PTD 4
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE
VS
C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) Decision without reason

If the decision is given without any reasons then one of the two most essential ingredients will be missed. It is on the basis of the reasons which support order that the same can be challenged in an appeal. The said order of CIR(A) is cryptic and devoid of reasons. Read More...


2019 PTD 4
Islamabad High Court 2019 OIL AND GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 49, 4 & 80 , Constitution, Arts. 165 & 165-A Exemption of certain public property from taxation under Art. 165 of the Constitution

Liability of income tax on statutory bodies/entities---- Benefit of exemption of levy of income on income of Federal and Provincial Governments and local authorities under S.49 of the ITO, 2001---Scope---Question before the High Court was whether certain statutory Read More...


2019 PTD 587
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE
VS
C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) Last fact finding forum

The settled principles regarding administration of justice are that the appellate authorities / judicial and quasi judicial authorities including officials / Administrative or taxing authorities while dispensing justice and exercising judicial or quasi powers are Read More...


2019 PTD 4
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE
VS
C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) Proper investigation and enquiry.

A careful perusal of the data/reconciliation reveals the fact that the appellant has sufficiently reconciled the figures as declared in withholding tax statement filed under section 165 of the Ordinance and Annex H-l of the income tax return form, therefore, we are Read More...


2019 PTD 4
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 MUHAMMAD NAZIR AHMED
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 114(4), 120, 122-C, 172 & 218(2) Filing of return of income/Amendment of assessment

Notice under S.114(4) of the ITO, 2001 for filing of income tax return for relevant year was issued to the taxpayer, but on due date neither anybody attended the office nor any application for adjournment was filed---Assessing authority made provisional assessment Read More...


2019 PTD 598
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE
VS
C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) Disallowance expenditure

Principles of natural justice requires that where a taxpayer produces books of accounts and supporting documents the Assessing Officer shall before disagreeing with such accounts/version, give a notice to the taxpayer of the defects in the accounts and provide an Read More...


2019 PTD 4
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE
VS
C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) Defect in accounts

Also that the Assessing Officer shall record the explanation of the taxpayer and the basis of computation of total income by the taxpayer in the assessment order. We are persuaded to agree that the IRO did not act in accordance with law while discarding the declared Read More...


2019 PTD 4
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 MESSRS MUGHAL ENGINEERING WORKS, RAWALPINDI
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O. RAWALPINDI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 121(1)(d), 177 Best judgment assessment / derived income from Engineering Work

Taxpayer, an individual, who derived income from Engineering Work, filed income tax return-Case of taxpayer was selected for audit under S.177 of the ITO, 2001 and he was required to produce books of account and related documents--Notices issued to the taxpayer Read More...


2019 PTD 610
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., SUKKUR
VS
AL-SANA OIL MILLS, SUKKUR
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 53(2), 113, 113(1), 122(5A), Second Schedule, Part-III, Clause 8 Tax Liability u/s 113

Brief facts of the case as gathered from the record are that the taxpayer is an Individual in the business of manufacturing/distribution of vegetable and Animals Oil and fats is aggrieved by order under section 122(5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance wherein the tax Read More...


2019 PTD 503
Lahore High Court 2019 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LAHORE
VS
MESSRS CHAUDHARY DAIRIES LTD.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50(4), 136(1)(2), First Schedule Departmental Practice

11). Even otherwise, the aforesaid notification has been interpreted by the department and the Tribunal consistently as having retrospective effect after the case reported as (1997 PTD (Trib.) 2145) (supra) which had been decided immediately after the amending Read More...


2019 PTD 452
120 TAX 381
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 RAJA ABDUL GHAFOOR
VS
CIR, RTO, RAWALPINDI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 111(1) & 122 Unexplained income or assets/Amendment of assessment/ When law would provide procedure

Taxpayer filed income tax return for relevant year declaring income subject to Final Tax Regime and income subject to normal regime and dept. assessment income---Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) noticed certain serious discrepancies on the part of taxpayer and Read More...


2019 PTD 751
Sindh High Court 2019 SULTAN AHMED THROUGH GENERAL ATTORNEY
VS
PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, KARACHI AND 4 OTHERS
Registration Act 1908 S. 17 & 47 Registration of document

Registration of document--Time from which registered document operates-Scope-Registered document operates from time when it was presented and executed before concerned Sub-Registrar after completing all codal formalities and payments of required duties, taxes and Read More...


2019 PTD 741
Sindh High Court 2019 SULTAN AHMED THROUGH GENERAL ATTORNEY
VS
PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, KARACHI AND 4 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 236-W [as inserted by Income Tax (Fourth Amend) Act (XLIX of 2016)]---Registration Act (XVI of 1908), S. 17 Registration of sub-lease/ Withholding of deed by Registration authorities--

Registration of sub-lease---Withholding of deed by Registration authorities--Petitioner was aggrieved of withholding of sublease deed registered with Sub-Registrar for non-payment of income tax----Authorities were not justified to withhold documents of petitioner Read More...


2019 PTD 741
Islamabad High Court 2019 MESSRS ATTOCK GEN LTD.
VS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (AUDIT), LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 10A Show cause was a demand to produce a satisfactory explanation

Fundamental right to fair trial and due process of law---Issuance of show-cause notice---Scope---Show-cause notice was essentially an instrument whereby authorized person under law informed a person regarding allegation or facts which may form basis for proceedings Read More...


2019 PTD 692
Islamabad High Court 2019 MESSRS ATTOCK GEN LTD.
VS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (AUDIT), LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) | Constitution of Pakistan S. 122(9) & (5) | Art. 199 Show-cause notice/ Constitutional petition

Show-cause notice was impugned by petitioner--Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Scope--Show- cause notice was not an adverse order unless it could be clearly shown to the satisfaction of the Court that it had been issued by an authority not vested with Read More...


2019 PTD 692
Sindh High Court 2019 SULTAN AHMED THROUGH GENERAL ATTORNEY
VS
PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, KARACHI AND 4 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 236-W [as inserted by Income Tax (Fourth Amend) Act (XLIX of 2016)]---Registration Act (XVI of 1908), S. 17 Registration of sub-lease/ Withholding of deed by Registration authorities--

Registration of sub-lease---Withholding of deed by Registration authorities--Petitioner was aggrieved of withholding of sublease deed registered with Sub-Registrar for non-payment of income tax----Authorities were not justified to withhold documents of petitioner Read More...


2019 PTD 741
Lahore High Court 2019 MUHAMMAD MUJAHID QURESHI & 4 OTHERS
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 114, 115(4), 116, 118, 119, 119(2), 137(1), 177, 214D, 231(3) Audit, selection

Admittedly, the audit is sought to be done for the tax year 2015 as also the section 214D was added by the Finance Act, 2015. However, by its very terms, the said provision was intended to be applied retrospectively to the past tax years as an audit can only be Read More...


2019 PTD 535
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 RAJA ABDUL GHAFOOR
VS
CIR, RTO, RAWALPINDI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 111(1) & 122 Unexplained income or assets/Amendment of assessment/ When law would provide procedure

Taxpayer filed income tax return for relevant year declaring income subject to Final Tax Regime and income subject to normal regime and dept. assessment income---Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) noticed certain serious discrepancies on the part of taxpayer and Read More...


2019 PTD 751
Lahore High Court 2019 SHAHZADA SOHAIL KAMRAN KHAN AND 2 OTHERS
VS
CHAIRMAN OF STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION, KARACHI AND 8 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 233 Employee & Commission Agent

The question whether commission agents of the Corporation are its employees came up before the Hon’ble Supreme Court agreed with the conclusion of the learned Sindh High Court which dismissed the constitutional petitions filed by the commission agents as being Read More...


2019 PTD 128
Lahore High Court 2019 RAWALPINDI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (RDA)
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE (FBR)
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 49, 49(1)(2)(4), 80(2), 122(c), 137(2), 138(1) Levy of Income Tax; autonomous body

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner- RDA as per Punjab Government Rules of Business, 1974 being attached department of the Province of Punjab is exempted from levy of tax under section 49(2) of the Ordinance, 2001 read with Article 165A Read More...


2019 PTD 1734
(2019) 119 TAX 420
Sindh High Court 2019 SULTAN AHMED THROUGH GENERAL ATTORNEY
VS
PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, KARACHI AND 4 OTHERS
Registration Act 1908 S. 17 & 47 Registration of document

Registration of document--Time from which registered document operates-Scope-Registered document operates from time when it was presented and executed before concerned Sub-Registrar after completing all codal formalities and payments of required duties, taxes and Read More...


2019 PTD 741
Sindh High Court 2019 AZEE SECURITIES (PVT.) LIMITED.
VS
FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE & OTHERS.
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 214C, 177 & 120 Civil Procedure Code 1908 Rr. 1 & 2 Audit Policy, 2017/Selection for audit

Disclosure of parameters for selection for audit----Application of S. 214C(1A) of the ITO, 2001----Interim injunction against audit of taxpayer under ITO, 2001----Scope----Plaintiff / taxpayer’ sought interim injunction to restrain Dept. from proceeding any Read More...


2019 PTD 903
Sindh High Court 2019 AZEE SECURITIES (PVT.) LIMITED.
VS
FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE & OTHERS.
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 214C, 177 & 120 Civil Procedure Code 1908 Rr. 1 & 2 Audit within itself is not an adverse action, says Honurable Court

Selection and conduct of audit by Dept. under ITO, 2001----Nature and scope----Audit within itself is not an adverse action and or order, particularly in a system where tax return was to be filed by a taxpayer under Self-assessment and was to be treated as an Read More...


2019 PTD 903
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 HAFIZ ABDUL KARIM
VS
C.I.R., R.T.O., MULTAN
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 122 & 129 Amendment of finalized assessment by Officer Inland Revenue

Amendment of finalized assessment by Officer Inland Revenue---Number of Mistakes had been made been made by the Officer while amending the assessment----Commissioner (Appeals) also passed a non-speaking order and annulled the amended assessment with the direction of Read More...


2019 PTD 982
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 HAFIZ ABDUL KARIM
VS
C.I.R., R.T.O., MULTAN
Income Tax Ordinance Administration of Justice

If the basic order is void then any superstructure built thereon is also liable to Read More...


2019 PTD 982.
Sindh High Court 2019 HUM NETWORK LTD. THROUGH CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY
VS
PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE AND 2 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 233 & 21 Collection of Advance Tax on Brokerage and Commission

Deductions not allowed Advertising agency commission----Applicability of S.233(2) of the ITO, 2001---Application for interim injunction to stop operation of show-cause notice(s)----Scope----Taxpayer, which was a television channel, impugned show-cause notice whereby Read More...


2019 PTD 987
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI
VS
MESSRS SITARA ENERGY LTD
Interpretation of statutes Ramedial and curative legislation

Ramedial and curative legislation----Retrospective effect---Principles--Such legislation has retrospective effect---Beneficial executive orders/notifications have retrospective Read More...


2019 PTD 1024
Lahore High Court 2019 WISAL KAMAL FABRICS (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 18(1)(d), 122(5A) & 133 Tax liability, determination of-Interest free loans by directors of company

Interest free loans by directors of company-Nature- Taxpayer was receiving interest free loans extended by its directors which was declared as taxpayer's benefits by tax authorities---Taxpayer's appeal before Appellate Tribunal IR was dismissed ex-parte-Indeed--No Read More...


2019 PTD 1077
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 MESSRS GLOBAL HEALTH SERVICES (PUBLIC) LTD., ISLAMABAD
VS
THE C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 161, 131 & 205 Income Tax Rules, 2002, R.44(4) Charge of withholding tax on the gross amounts of expenses claimed under various heads

Charge of withholding tax on the gross amounts of expenses claimed under various heads, without examining the record---Appeal had been filed against order of Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) passed under Ss.161/205 of ITO, 2001; whereby Assessing Officer's Read More...


2019 PTD 1081
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 M/S NIT INCOME FUND, KARACHI
VS
The C.I.R., ZONE-I, C.R.T.O., KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 122, 129, 150 & Second Sched., Part-I Clause-99 Re-investment of profit/ issuance of Dividends

National Investment Trust Limited was aggrieved of order passed by authorities rejecting claim of exemption though taxpayer had not issued any bonus units--- Indeed- Taxpayer issued dividends to shareholders and amongst them some shareholders purchased new shares by Read More...


2019 PTD 1100
Lahore High Court 2019 M/s LAHORE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD.
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE AND 4 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 140 & 170 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 Notice of recovery of tax---Persons holding money on behalf of taxpayer

Persons holding money on behalf of taxpayer---Refunds--Appellant assailed notice of recovery of tax sued by income tax authorities on the ground that its refund claim for larger amount was pending undetermined with the dept. and it was appropriate to adjust the said Read More...


2019 PTD 1116
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2019 M/s. MUSLIM TRADERS, CHAKWAL
VS
The C.I.R., R.T.O., RAWALPINDI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 2(68), 74, 161, 205 & 221 Tax year

Demand orders in piecemeal in respect of a tax year and passing of orders before completion of the tax year---Original proceedings for demand for the tax year 2014 comprising the period from July, 2013 to November 2013 were finalized under Ss. 161/205 of the ITO, Read More...


2019 PTD 1118
Lahore High Court 2019 KHURRAM SHAHZAD
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, ETC.
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 175 Power to enter and search premises

Commissioner could authorize entry and search of the premises of a taxpayer in order to enforce any provision of the ITO, 2001 (‘the Ordinance’) i.e. that there must be an infringement or non-compliance of some provision of the Ordinance which the tax Read More...


2019 PTD 1124
Lahore High Court 2019 KHURRAM SHAHZAD
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, ETC.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 175 Power to enter and search premises/CIR to justify

Seizure of record computer and accounts of a business---No compelling reasons provided for initiating seizure proceedings---Tax dept. on the basis of an authorization order issued under S. 175 of the ITO, 2001 (‘the Ordinance’) by the commissioner Read More...


2019 PTD 1124
Peshawar High Court 2018 MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT
VS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 148 & 154 Nature of minimum /Double taxation

Final tax under S. 154 of ITO Ord.2001  as an imposition independent from imposition under S, 148 of the ITO Ord.2001 ---Nature---Imported goods, if subsequently exported, were subject to imposition of income tax at two stages/twice---Scope----Question before Read More...


2018 PTD 2181
Peshawar High Court 2018 MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT
VS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. Ss. 122, 120 & 170 Assessment/Order deemed to be passed by Commissioner under S. 120 of the ITO Ord.2001 /Amendment of assessment

Nature of power of Commissioner to amend assessment order under S. 122(5A) of the ITO Ord.2001 , as distinct from power of adjudication of refund claims under S. 170 of the ITO Ord.2001 ---Scope----Question before the High Court was whether Commissioner had Read More...


2018 PTD 2181
Peshawar High Court 2018 MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT
VS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER
Interpretation of statutes statutory provision

Any statutory provision which conferred jurisdiction could not be made redundant on mere assumptions or implications. Read More...


2018 PTD 2181
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 M/s BESTWAY CEMENT (PVT.) LTD, ISLAMABAD
VS
C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 161, 174(3), 205 Failure to pay tax collected or deducted/Declaring an assessee in default/Limitation

Department took action against appellant taxpayer under Ss.161/205 of the ITO Ord.2001  for his failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Taxpayer challenged such action relaying upon the time limitation given in S.174(3) of the ITO Ord.2001.
Ss. 161/205 of Read More...


2018 PTD 602
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 M/s. Azgard Nine Limited, Lahore
VS
CIR, LTU , Lahore
provision of law provision of law

Every provision of law had to be interpreted so as to make the law workable and no redundancy could be attached or attributed to the provision or the legislative Read More...


2018 PTD 739
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2018 PAKISTAN STATE OIL LTD.
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 80C Tax could be levied up to, or below, the total income/100 percent/confiscation of the property

Presumptive tax/deemed income tax---Oil products imported by the Federal Government through Pakistan State Oil (“PSO”) as its Handling Agent---Commission on handling charges was paid to PSO for the assessment year in question and Read More...


2018 PTD 1306
(2018) 118 TAX 247
2018 PTCL 783
2018 SCMR 894
Sindh High Court 2018 Sadia Jabbar
VS
Federation of Pakistan and others
Customs Act 1979 S. 25 & 30 Customs value of goods/World Trade Organization Agreement

Section 25 of Customs Act, 1969, embodied World trade Organization Agreement and was one of the most important provisions of the Act, which laid down the general manner in which the customs value of imported goods was to be determined---Proper determination of the Read More...


2018 PTD 1746
2014 PTCL 537
Sindh High Court 2018 Sadia Jabbar
VS
Federation of Pakistan and others
Interpretation of statutes statutory provision / Pakistan’s treaty obligations

Statute or statutory provision which embodied World Trade Organization Agreement---If two interpretation of such a provision, were possible, the one consistent with International Law or Pakistan’s treaty obligations, would be preferred---If meaning of the Read More...


2018 PTD 1746
2014 PTCL 537
Sindh High Court 2018 Sadia Jabbar
VS
Federation of Pakistan and others
Interpretation of statutes legislative intent, and if that intent was clear

Amendments were usually intended to change the law----In special case, even if it was concluded that the amendment had changed the law, the amendment should, if at all possible, be interpreted and applied in a manner which would remain Read More...


2018 PTD 1746
2014 PTCL 537
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2018 CIVIC CENTRES COMPANY (PVT.) LIMITED
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, COMPANIES ZONE, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 19(1), 19(2)(a), 22(a), 22(b) & 22(c) Wealth Tax Act 1963, S. 2(1)(16) & 3 Rental income/Income from business or profession/ Income from house property

Properties belonging to two State owned entities were transferred to a private limited company (‘the appellant-company’) owned by the Federal Government on directions of the Prime Minister Secretariat---Subsequently, the Prime Read More...


2018 PTD 1808
(2019) 119 TAX 180
2018 SCMR 1391
2018 PLJ 603
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 M/s BESTWAY CEMENT (PVT.) LTD, ISLAMABAD
VS
C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 161, 174(3) & 205 Failure to pay tax collected or deducted/Declaring an assessee in default/Limitation

Department took action against appellant taxpayer under Ss.161/205 of the ITO Ord.2001  for his failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Taxpayer challenged such action relaying upon the time limitation given in S.174(3) of the ITO Ord.2001.
Ss. 161/205 of Read More...


2018 PTD 602
Peshawar High Court 2018 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE-RTO
VS
DR. GHULAM RASOOL
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 122(1), 128(5) & 133(1) admitting additional documents

Taxation officer initiated proceedings against taxpayer, after finalization of assessment, and amended the assessment under S.122(1) OF ITO Ord.2001 --- Appellate Authority set aside additional tax by requisitioning wealth statement and said order was maintained by Read More...


2018 PTD 612
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 MESSRS GHULAM HABIB AND CO., PESHAWAR AND OTHERS
VS
C.I.R., R.T.O., PESHAWAR AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 114, 115(4), 153(1)(c), 159, 169(b) & 170 Filing of income tax returns/Tax collected or deducted as final tax/Refund claim

Taxpayers, who were contractors falling under the purview of “Final Tax Regime (FTR)” by virtue of Ss.153(1)(c) & 169(b) of the ITO Ord.2001 were required to file statement under S.115(4) of the ITO Ord.2001 ; which they did so, but later on they Read More...


2018 PTD 616
(2018)118 TAX 43
Islamabad High Court 2018 WI-TRIBE PAKISTAN LTD.
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 170 & 127 Constitutional petition before the High Court against rejection of refund applications

Constitutional petition before the High Court against rejection of application for issuance of refunds ---Maintainability---Alternate remedy available in the statute---Impugned order rejecting application of petitioner-company for issuance of refunds was passed Read More...


2018 PTD 654
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 MESSRS BP PAKISTAN EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION INC, KARACHI
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 131 Delay in filing appeal/Condonation/ Delay of 72 days

Delay of 72 days in filing appeal had been sought to be condoned contending that said delay was neither deliberate not intentional, but due to transfer of record and employees, the papers were inadvertently missed and did not reach the principal officer of the Read More...


2018 PTD 691
Supreme Court (AJ&K) 2018 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR COUNCIL, MIRPUR
VS
MOHAMMAD NASEER QURESHI AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.206 & Second Sched. Pt. III, Cl.1(2) Finance Act (III of 2006), Preamble---Finance Act (XXII of 2013), Second Sched. Pt. I, Cl.58-A FBR Circular No.6 of 2013 dated 19-07-2013--- Teachers performing administrative jobs/Payment of tax on income from salary

Teachers performing administrative jobs---Payment of tax on income from salary---Term ‘full time teacher’---Scope---FBR issued Circular No.6 of 2013 dated 19-07-2013 dated 19-07-2013 whereby tax liability on income from salary equivalent to 75% had been Read More...


2018 PTD 693
(2018)118 TAX 483
Islamabad High Court 2018 FAUJI FERTILIZER COMPANY LTD.
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 147 & 205 Advance tax paid in quarterly installments

Notices issued to petitioner-company seeking proof of basis for estimation of advance tax paid in installments---Legality---Perusal of S.147 of the ITO Ord.2001 led to the conclusion that once estimate (of advance tax) was filed by the tax payer whether right or Read More...


2018 PTD 719
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 M/s. Azgard Nine Limited, Lahore
VS
CIR, LTU , Lahore
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 131(5), Appeal with application before Appellate Tribunal, seeking grant of stay.

Appeal with application before Appellate Tribunal, seeking grant of stay against recovery of tax demand---Commissioner-IR (Appeals), pending appeal, had denied stay against recovery of tax.
Appellate Tribunal in terms of first proviso to subsection (5) of S.131 Read More...


2018 PTD 739
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 M/s. Azgard Nine Limited, Lahore
VS
CIR, LTU , Lahore
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 131(5), Appeal with application before Appellate Tribunal, seeking grant of stay against recovery of tax demand

Appeal with application to Appellate Tribunal seeking grant of stay against recovery of tax demand---Commissioner-IR (Appeals), pending appeal, had denied stay against recovery of tax,
Subsection(1) of S.131 of the ITO Ord.2001 , provided that any party objecting Read More...


2018 PTD 739
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 M/s. Azgard Nine Limited, Lahore
VS
CIR, LTU , Lahore
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 131(5), Appeal with application before Appellate Tribunal/ seeking grant of stay

Grant of stay against recovery of tax demand by Appellate Tribunal---Scope---Section 132 of the ITO Ord.2001 , provided that there were two types of appeals; one which related to the assessment order and the other related to decision other than Read More...


2018 PTD 739
Lahore High Court 2018 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
M/S. SIKA PAINT INDUSTRIES
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss.122(4)(5) & 133(1) Definite information/ Amendment of assessment

Assessing officer amended assessment on the basis of material recovered as a result of raid conducted on the premises of assessee---Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue set aside the order passed by authorities on the ground that there was no definite information Read More...


2018 PTD 749
Peshawar High Court 2018 MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT
VS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 Minimum Tax

The close perusal of section 148(8) of the Ordinance would unfold the situation as that Tax paid at the import stage is a minimum amount of tax and the importer Read More...


2018 PTD 2181
Peshawar High Court 2018 MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT
VS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 Minimum Tax

The close perusal of section 148(8) of the Ordinance would unfold the situation as that Tax paid at the import stage is a minimum amount of tax and the importer Read More...


2018 PTD 2181
Peshawar High Court 2018 MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT
VS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 Final Tax Regime

The close perusal of section 148(8) of the Ordinance would unfold the situation as that Tax paid at the import stage is a minimum amount of tax and the importer Read More...


2018 PTD 2181
Peshawar High Court 2018 MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT
VS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 Double Taxation

The close perusal of section 148(8) of the Ordinance would unfold the situation as that Tax paid at the import stage is a minimum amount of tax and the importer is subject to the payment of income tax under Read More...


2018 PTD 2181
Peshawar High Court 2018 MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT
VS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 Refund

From the plain reading of section 170 of the Ordinance, it is evident that the claim for refund has different para-meters and Read More...


2018 PTD 2181
Peshawar High Court 2018 MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT
VS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 Amendment of Assessment

From the plain reading of section 170 of the Ordinance, it is evident that the claim for refund has different para-meters and yardsticks. As stated above, Read More...


2018 PTD 2181
Peshawar High Court 2018 MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT
VS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 Power of Commissioner and Delegates

In other words, a complete tax return upon its filing becomes assessment order of the Commissioner Inland Revenue. Under the present dispensation, mere filing Read More...


2018 PTD 2181
Peshawar High Court 2018 MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT
VS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 Amendment of Assessment

In other words, a complete tax return upon its filing becomes assessment order of the Commissioner Inland Revenue. Under the present dispensation, mere filing Read More...


2018 PTD 2181
Peshawar High Court 2018 MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT
VS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 Independent Incidence

The close perusal of section 148(8) of the Ordinance would unfold the situation as that Tax paid at the import stage is a minimum amount of tax and the importer Read More...


2018 PTD 2181
Peshawar High Court 2018 MUHAMMAD ASIF and others
VS
THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 12, 148 & Second Schedule, Part-I Notification No. FD(SOSR-II) 8-43/2010 dated 27-07-2010 deduction of income tax on special judicial allowance

Petitioner were judicial officers and were aggrieved of deduction of income tax on special judicial allowance---Plea raised by authorities was that judicial allowance was not covered under Item-39, Part-II of Second Schedule of ITO Ord.2001.
Income chargeable to Read More...


2018 PTD 806
Lahore High Court 2018 KOHINOOR SUGAR MILLS
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC.
Interpretation of statutes Amendment in law

Amendment in law---Effect---Where any statutory law is changed there is a presumption that it affects change is legal rights to the extent provided by such amendment---Amending provisions have to be read along with un-amended provision s as they are part of the same Read More...


2018 PTD 821
(2018)118 TAX 393
2018 PTCL 98
Lahore High Court 2018 KOHINOOR SUGAR MILLS
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.177 & 214-C [inserted through Finance Act (XVI of 2010)] Audit/Power of Commissioner and Federal Board of Revenue

Power of Commissioner under S.177, ITO Ord.2001  is independent and exercisable subject in a different set of conditions on basis of record before him as compare to powers available to FBR in terms of S.214-C of ITO Ord.2001  which are not record based, Read More...


2018 PTD 821
(2018)118 TAX 393
2018 PTCL 98
Lahore High Court 2018 KOHINOOR SUGAR MILLS
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 114(2)(b), 120(1), 122, 177 & 214-C [inserted through Finance Act (XVI of 2010)]--- Selection of taxpayer for audit

Mere selection of taxpayer for audit and calling of books of accounts to verify version declared in his return under USAS, which is main theme on which entire structure of ITO Ord.2001 has been built does not cause any injury/prejudice to Read More...


2018 PTD 821
(2018)118 TAX 393
2018 PTCL 98
Lahore High Court 2018 KOHINOOR SUGAR MILLS
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC.
Interpretation of Constitution & Interpretation of statutes Wisdom of legislature/Judicial restraint/ Retrospective effect

Judicial restraint needs to be exercised in questioning wisdom of legislature in enacting a law or an amendment therein subject to caveat that it has been made competently and without in any manner transgressing limitations imposed by Read More...


2018 PTD 821
(2018)118 TAX 393
2018 PTCL 98
Lahore High Court 2018 KOHINOOR SUGAR MILLS
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 177 & 214-C [inserted through Finance Act (XVI of 2010)]--- Notice of audit/Non-mentioning of reasons

Petitioners were taxpayers and they were aggrieved of notices issued under S.177 of ITO Ord.2001  by Commissioner to conduct their audits---Plea raised by taxpayers was that no reasons had been assigned in notices for selection of their cases for Read More...


2018 PTD 821
(2018)118 TAX 393
2018 PTCL 98
Lahore High Court 2018 KOHINOOR SUGAR MILLS
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 177 & 214-C [inserted through Finance Act (XVI of 2010) Audit/ Selection of case by Commissioner

Selection of case by Commissioner and Federal Board of Revenue---Procedure---Taxpayer receiving notice from Commissioner calling for his record for purpose of audit and at same time being selected by FBR for computerized, random or parametric balloting, only one Read More...


2018 PTD 821
(2018)118 TAX 393
2018 PTCL 98
Lahore High Court 2018 KOHINOOR SUGAR MILLS
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC.
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) ---Ss. 177 & 214-C [inserted through Finance Act (XVI of 2010)]--- Audit

Provisions relating to audit are germane to assessment of taxable income of assessee and are machinery provisions which should be construed in a manner which makes the machinery procedure workable---Audit provisions being machinery provisions, should be liberally Read More...


2018 PTD 821
(2018)118 TAX 393
2018 PTCL 98
Sindh High Court 2018 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, WHT, ZONE, RTO-II, KARACHI
VS
M/S. TIANSHI INTERNATIONAL PAKISTAN CO. (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 133, 161 & 205 Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 34 Authorities were aggrieved of deleting default surcharge

Default surcharge---Authorities were aggrieved of deleting default surcharge under Ss.161 & 205 of ITO Ord.2001 , by Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue.
Provisions of S.34 of Sales Tax Act, 1990, were materially not different in scope from the provisions of Read More...


2018 PTD 900
2018 PTD 900
Islamabad High Court 2018 M/S BESTWAY CEMENT LIMITED
VS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ETC.
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 122(5-A) & 122(9) Amendment in procedure/Retrospective effect

Petitioner company was taxpayer and aggrieved of notices issued by authorities seeking information and record with regard to assessment orders passed in previous years.
Any amendment even though procedural in nature which could affect vested was rights of any Read More...


2018 PTD 977
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., SUKKUR
VS
M/S. NABI BUX GOLD SMITH, UBARO
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 122(3) (5-A) & 177 Amendment of assessment/Taxpayer, a goldsmith

Taxpayer, a goldsmith, filed return of income for tax year 2006 which was revised as a result of proceedings conducted under S.177 of the ITO Ord.2001 ---Additional Commissioner Inland Revenue/ Adjudicating Authority amended the assessment enhancing the amount of Read More...


2018 PTD 991
Islamabad High Court 2018 OCEAN PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ISLAMABAD
VS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, (AUDIT-I), ISLAMABAD AND 2 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 11(1)(c)(d), 53, 54, 122 & 133 Regulation of Mines and Oilfields and Mineral Development (Government Control) Act (XXIV of 1948), Ss.2 & 3-B--- Working Interest, sale of---Taxable income

Applicant was a foreign company engaged in petroleum exploration in Pakistan, who sold its entire share of Working Interest to another company-Authorities issued notice of recovery tax on consideration amount received by applicant in such transaction--- Plea raised Read More...


2018 PTD 996
(2019)119 TAX 333
Islamabad High Court 2018 OCEAN PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ISLAMABAD
VS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, (AUDIT-I), ISLAMABAD AND 2 OTHERS
Interpretation of statutes Enactment or repeal of law/----Fiscal statute

Authority---Legislature has the exclusive domain to make laws or to repeal, amend and revise existing statutory enactments---Repeal of an existing law may be amended through express intendment or it may be implied from statute enacted later in time and which contain Read More...


2018 PTD 996
(2019)119 TAX 333
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 THAHEEM RICE MILLS, SHIKARPUR
VS
The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, AUDIT ZONE-II, R.T.O., SUKKUR
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 122(2)(5-A) Amendment of assessment order-Limitation---Assessment order, could be amended within five years

Amendment of assessment order-Limitation---Assessment order, could be amended within five years after its issuance, as provided under S.122(2) of the ITO Ord.2001 ---Assessment order, in the present case, was amended after four months and twenty one days of its Read More...


2018 PTD 1027
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 C.I.R., R.T.O., ABBOTABAD
VS
SHAHID MEHMOOD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 177 & 214-C Audit Selection/ Powers of Commissioner-IR and FBR

Case of taxpayer was selected for audit by Commissioner Inland Revenue, and for non-compliance of notices by the taxpayer, ex parte order was passed---Commissioner-IR (Appeals), annulled assessment on the ground that Commissioner-IR was not empowered to select cases Read More...


2018 PTD 1054
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 M/S. SUNNY JEWELERS, RAWALPINDI
VS
C.I.R., R.T.O., RAWALPINDI
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 113 B, 114, 120, 122(1)(5-A) & 177 Taxation of income of retailers/Audit

Selection of case for audit---Amendment of assessment---Case of taxpayer was selected for audit under S.177 of ITO Ord.2001 ---Taxpayer contented that his return of income filed under S.113B of ITO Ord.2001  could not be amended under S.122 of Said Read More...


2018 PTD 1062
Islamabad High Court 2018 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL), ISLAMABAD
VS
MESSRS ASKARI COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED, RAWALPINDI
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 17(1)(a) Expression "Receivable"


Expression 'Receivable'--Connotation---Expression 'receivable' cannot be construed as involving actual receipt of income- Under international accounting standards 'receivable' is distinct from actual receipt of Read More...


2018 PTD 1089
2018 PTCL 832
Islamabad High Court 2018 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL), ISLAMABAD
VS
MESSRS ASKARI COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED, RAWALPINDI
Interpretation of statutes Taxing/fiscal statute/ No Intendment/ No presumption

Taxing/fiscal statute--Intendment---Court, in case of taxing statute has to look to clear words since there is no question of any intendment---No presumption or equity about tax--Nothing can be read or implied in taxing statute--Statute has to be read as a whole in Read More...


2018 PTD 1089
2018 PTCL 832
Islamabad High Court 2018 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL), ISLAMABAD
VS
MESSRS ASKARI COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED, RAWALPINDI
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 2(12), 33, 34, & 80(1)(b)--- Banking company/Status Accounting on cash/accrual basis

Banking company-Status Accounting on cash/accrual basis-Scope-Each individual Bank is a company within meaning of expression 'company' under S.2(12) read with S.80(1)(b) of ITO Ord.2001 ---Mandatory for Banks to account for chargeability to tax under head 'income Read More...


2018 PTD 1089
2018 PTCL 832
Islamabad High Court 2018 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL), ISLAMABAD
VS
MESSRS ASKARI COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED, RAWALPINDI
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 [since repealed]-- S. 17(1), 23(1)(x), 24(1) & 32 Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 18(2), 32, 33, 34 & 100-A-Public Debt Act 1944 S. 28 Interest on securities/Charging of tax/charging of tax from Banking companies on securities

Dispute was with regard to charging of tax from Banking companies on securities offered by Federal Government under Public Debt Act, 1944.
Income tax was chargeable to tax under ITO Ord.2001  during tax year when income derived from interest on government Read More...


2018 PTD 1089
2018 PTCL 832
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2018 SHAUKAT ALI, PROP. SHAUKAT OIL TRADERS, FAISALABAD
VS
C.I.R., R.T.O., FAISALABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 113, 122(5-A), 153(1)(b) & 221, Second Sched., Part III, Cl.(8) Minimum/turnover tax, charge of/Amendment of assessment/Deduction of withholding tax

Taxpayer, a dealer of petroleum products, contended that his product fell within the category of "Fast Moving Consumers Goods", whereupon minimum tax under S.113 of the ITO Ord.2001 as per Cl.(8) Part III, Second Sched. to the Ordinance, was 0.20%---Contention of Read More...


2018 PTD 1115
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2018 SHAUKAT ALI, PROP. SHAUKAT OIL TRADERS, FAISALABAD
VS
C.I.R., R.T.O., FAISALABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 53(2) General Clauses Act 1897 S.5--- Notification or enactment involving public money

Prospective or retrospective operation of---Scope---Such notification or enactment could not be extended retrospectively, even if those were beneficial to the taxpayer.. Such retrospective application was fraught with risk to the Revenue and could play havoc with Read More...


2018 PTD 1115
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2018 SHAUKAT ALI, PROP. SHAUKAT OIL TRADERS, FAISALABAD
VS
C.I.R., R.T.O., FAISALABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 113, 122(5-A), 153(1)(b) & 221, Second Sched., Part III, CL.(8)-S.R.O. No.57(1)/2012, dated 24-11-2012--- Minimum/turnover tax, charge of/Amendment of assessment/Deduction of withholding tax

Question in the present case, revolved around the claim of the taxpayer, which was two-fold, firstly, being a dealer of petroleum products he was entitled to claim 80% relief by treating the petroleum product as "Fast Moving Consumers Goods (FMCG) as per Cl.(8) of Read More...


2018 PTD 1115
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2018 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, KARACHI
VS
INTERNATIONAL POWER GLOBAL DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 23(xviii) Income from business/ Expenditure incurred for setting up a sports and recreational facility for employees

Expenditure incurred for setting up a sports and recreational facility for employees---Respondent-company derived its income by rendering operational and maintenance service to a power production company---In the subject assessment year the respondent incurred an Read More...


2018 PTD 1128
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2018 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV
VS
MESSRS HAZARA EFFICIENT GAS, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 2(29-C) & 153(7)(iv)(a)(b) Status of industrial undertaking/ Determination

Respondent/company claimed to be ‘industrial undertaking’, but Additional Commissioner-IR (Appeals) passed detail order holding that company was an industrial undertaking meeting all requirements of S.2(29-C) of the ITO Ord.2001  and that company Read More...


2018 PTD 1188
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2018 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV
VS
OCCIDENTAL OIL AND GAS PAKISTAN LTD., KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 60-A, 114 & 122(1) Worker’s Welfare Fund Ordinance (XXXVI of 1971), Ss.2 & 4--- Worker"s Welfare Fund chargeable on declared income

Taxation Officer charged workers welfare fund on the amended income instead of declared income; whereas subsection (1) of S.2 of Workers Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971, as amended in 2006, emphasized that workers welfare fund was chargeable on declared income as per Read More...


2018 PTD 1199
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2018 PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN FBR AND OTHERS
VS
HAZRAT HUSSAIN AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 148(1) & 148(5) Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 247(3)---Provincially Administered Tribal Areas (“PATA”) PATA/exemption

 Provincially Administered Tribal Areas (“PATA”)---Advance income tax on import or raw material/machinery meant for “PATA”---Non-applicability of Sales Tax Act, 1990---Constitution itself granted complete immunity for, and in relation to Read More...


2018 PTD 1204
(2018)118 TAX 260
2018 PTD 1204
2018 SCMR 939
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2018 PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN FBR AND OTHERS
VS
HAZRAT HUSSAIN AND OTHERS
ITO Ord.2001 Appeal

Appeals should not be filed as a matter of routine or because a decision has been rendered against the (Government) department---Decisions should be taken on a reasonable basis and it was not advisable for government departments to waste public time and money by Read More...


2018 PTD 1204
(2018)118 TAX 260
2018 PTD 1204
2018 SCMR 939
HIGH COURT (AJ&K) 2018 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, MIRPUR
VS
SHAKEEL AHMED AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133 Question of law

According to the statutory provisions of section 133 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the High Court has to decide the questions of law raised in the reference. In our considered view, it was enjoined upon the High Court to attend all the questions of law and Read More...


2018 PTD 2228
(2019)119 TAX 257
2019 PTCL 263
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 MESSRS MOL PAKISTAN OIL AND GAS CO. B.V.
VS
C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 100, 122(5-A) & 129, Fifth Schedule, Part 1, Rr.1 & 2 Business of production and exploration of petroleum/ Claim of expenses

Claim of expenses of one Petroleum Concession Agreement (P.C.A.) against the income from the other---Concept of 'ring fencing' and 'one basket'--- Amendment of assessment---Taxpayers, who were engaged in business of production and exploration of Petroleum, had Read More...


2018 PTD 1344
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 MESSRS MOL PAKISTAN OIL AND GAS CO. B.V.
VS
C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 32(2) Method of accounting/ cash method and accrual method

Two principal methods of keeping track of a business's income and expenses were "cash method" and "accrual method"--Said methods differ only in the timing- ITO Ord.2001 , had provided that income of a person chargeable to tax was computed in accordance with the Read More...


2018 PTD 1344
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 MESSRS MOL PAKISTAN OIL AND GAS CO. B.V.
VS
C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 6 & 152 Payments to non-residents/Deduction of tax/ Additions

Company (tax-payer) was not provided with the adequate opportunity to provide the required details---Tax-payer company had provided all required data, showing that the company had released all the payments of Technical Assistance Fee after the proper deduction of Read More...


2018 PTD 1344
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 MESSRS MOL PAKISTAN OIL AND GAS CO. B.V.
VS
C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001. Fifth Schedule, Part-1, R.3 Royalty/ Expenditure incurred on account of royalty/Deduction

Assessing Officer made addition in tax on account of "depletion allowance". While making the impugned addition, the Assessing Officer observed that for the purpose of computing depletion allowance under R.3 of Part I of Fifth Schedule to the ITO Ord.2001 the Read More...


2018 PTD 1344
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 M/S. AL-RAHEEM TEXTILE PROCESSING, FAISALABAD
VS
C.I.R., LYALLPUR ZONE, R.T.O., FAISALABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.122(5-A) Amendment of assessment

Re-assessment proceedings taken place on presumption basis confronting wrong facts to re-open the assessment tantamount to fishing enquiry---First show-cause notice issued to the taxpayer was defective as neither the assessment was erroneous nor prejudicial to the Read More...


2018 PTD 1406
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 M/S. AL-RAHEEM TEXTILE PROCESSING, FAISALABAD
VS
C.I.R., LYALLPUR ZONE, R.T.O., FAISALABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.111(1)(b) Investment Tax Scheme, 2008---C.B.R. Circular No.3 of 2008 dated 1-7-2008 Investment in business/Declaration of business assets

Appellant/taxpayer, was an “Association of Persons” (AoP)---Both members of ‘AoP’ made investment in business and declared their business assets in wealth statements and explained the origin of sources of cash investment made in the Read More...


2018 PTD 1406
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2018 COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, SIALKOT AND OTHERS
VS
MESSRS ALLAH DIN STEEL AND ROLLING MILLS AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 214C Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 72B Federal Excise Act 2005 S. 42B Audit Policy, 2015 Random ballot for selection of taxpayers for audit/Non-framing of rules for selecting taxpayers for audit

Question as to whether there was any discrimination or arbitrariness in the process of selection for audit in the absence of specific rules, and whether a timeframe should be placed for purpose of completing of audit for a tax year; held, that mere selection for Read More...


2018 PTD 1444
(2019)119 TAX 27
2018 PTCL 678
2018 SCMR 1328
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2018 ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, AUDIT RANGE, ZONE-I AND OTHERS
VS
M/S EDEN BUILDERS LIMITED AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 122(2) [as amended by Finance Act (I of 2009) Amendment made in S.122(2)

Amendment made in S.122(2) of the ITO Ord.2001  through Finance Act, 2009 dated 30-06-2009 was not retrospective in effect---Taxpayers who filed their tax returns before S.122(2) of the ITO Ord.2001  was amended through the Finance Act, 2009 dates Read More...


2018 PTD 1474
(2018)117 TAX 509
2018 PTCL 661
2018 SCMR 991
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 MESSRS SALEEM FLOUR MILLS, USTA MUHAMMAD, BALOCHISTAN
VS
C.I.R. (WHT), R.T.O., QUETTA
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX 2001) Ss. 137(2), 140, 153, 161, 205 & 221 Failure to make deduction of withholding tax---Appellant/taxpayer

Failure to make deduction of withholding tax---Appellant/taxpayer, who was an Association of Persons (AOP), was required to deduct tax under S.153(1) of the ITO Ord.2001 , in respect of payment made on account of purchases made, services acquired and contract Read More...


2018 PTD 1480
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2018 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, HYDERABAD
VS
MESSRS MEDIMAKERS PHARMACEUTICAL (AOP), HYDERABAD
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 4, 114, 120, 122, 137, 138, 161 & 205 Failure to pay tax collected or deducted/Liability to pay additional tax

Assistant Commissioner-IR (ACIR), after examination of return of income filed by the taxpayer, observed that taxpayer had made purchases for relevant period at Rs.114,968,668 and taxpayer who was liable to deduct tax on such purchases had failed to deduct the same; Read More...


2018 PTD 1533
Lahore High Court 2018 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
MESSRS HAIER PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 133, 2(22A), & Second Sched., Part-III, CI. 8 consumer goods/ Reduction in tax liability

Meaning of the words “consumer goods” for purpose of benefit of reduction in tax liability---Question before the High Court was whether household electronic goods could be treated as consumed goods for the purpose of Clause 8 of Part III of the Second Read More...


2018 PTD 1582
(2018)118 TAX 332
Lahore High Court 2018 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
MESSRS HAIER PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.
Interpretation of statutes Canons of Construction-/rinciples of “ejusdem generis” and “expressio unjus est exclusio alterius”. application of

Meaning of ejusdem generis was ‘of the same kind or class’ and it was a canon of construction applied when a general word or phrase followed a list of specifics, then such general word or phrase would be interpreted to include only items of the same type Read More...


2018 PTD 1582
(2018)118 TAX 332
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2018 M/S NIT INCOME FUND, KARACHI
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 2(63)(64), 4-B, 9, 53-A, Sched. II Part-I, Cl.(99) Super Tax/Exemption from/Taxation Officer vide ex parte order charged Super Tax

Taxation Officer vide ex parte order charged Super Tax on income of taxpayer, which was a Public Limited Mutual Fund (Collective Investment Schemes)---Such order of Taxation Officer having been confirmed by Commissioner (Appeal); taxpayer challenged said order Read More...


2018 PTD 1723
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 MESSRS Z & J HYGIENIC PRODUCTS (PVT.) LTD., KAMOOKI
VS
THE CIR, RTO GUJRANWALA
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 53, 153, 161, 205 & Second Schedule, Part-IV, Cl.45-A Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 4 & 25 Deduction of short paid income tax/Failure to pay tax collected or deducted

Department, had itself rendered in order-in-original, that the taxpayer being a manufacturer was subjected to zero rating of sale tax through various notifications---Taxpayer, in circumstances, had correctly deducted withholding tax on reduced rates applicable on Read More...


2018 PTD 1817
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 BP PAKISTAN AND PRODUCTION INC. KARACHI
VS
THE CIR, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 60-A, 120, 122(1) & 221 Amendment of assessment/Rectification of mistake

Contention of taxpayer was that Commissioner-IR (Appeals) had erred in maintaining the action of Additional Commissioner-IR in calculating “depletion allowance”---Taxpayer also sough consequential relief in the liability of Worker Welfare Read More...


2018 PTD 1913
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2018 GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION/CBR HOUSE, ISLAMABAD
VS
MUHAMMAD JUNAID TALAT
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 19 Reward Order dated 14-5-1974 “Definite information” with regard to tax evasion/ Payment of ‘reward’ to informant

Respondent was the author of an article published in a daily newspaper wherein he mentioned issue of non-payment of income tax by seafarers of Pakistan discharging duty on foreign flagships---Pursuant to such article the income tax department raised a demand against Read More...


2018 PTD 1933
(2019)119 TAX 196
Lahore High Court 2018 TREET CORPORATION LTD.
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS W.P. NO. 11253 OF 2017, DECIDED ON 21ST MARCH, 2018.
ITO Ord.2001 Ss. 214C & 117 Sales Tax Act, 1990, S. 72B. Federal Excise Act, 2005, S. 42B. FBR Taxpayers’ Audit Policy, 2016 Audit of taxpayers. Random parametric selection of taxpayers for audit

Audit of taxpayers. Random parametric selection of taxpayers for audit. Parameters for computer balloting be clearly defined. Petitioner (taxpayer) impugned notices for selection for audit under Department’s Taxpayers’ Audit Policy, 2016, on the ground Read More...


2018 PTD 1942
2018 PTCL 596
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2018 FARRUKH SHAHZAD
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL) RTO, RAWALPINDI AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 37(1)(A). Capital gains tax on sale of immovable property.

Zero percent capital gains tax. Contention of taxpayer/petitioner that by virtue of S. 37(1)(A) of the ITO Ord.2001  the petitioner was not liable to pay capital gains tax as the subject property was purchased in the year 2008 and sold in the year Read More...


2018 PTD 2009
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2018 FARRUKH SHAHZAD
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL) RTO, RAWALPINDI AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 18 & 111(1) (b). Amendment of assessment by addition to accumulative wealth of tax payer.

Contention of tax-payer/petitioner that by virtue of S. 111(1)(b) of the ITO Ord.2001  there was no justification for adding Rs. 60 million in the accumulative wealth of the petitioner for the year 2013; that S. 111(2) of the Ordinance only permitted inclusion Read More...


2018 PTD 2009
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 MESSRS UNITED FINISHING MILL, NANKANA SAHIB
VS
THE C.I.R., R.T.O., LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 177, 120 & 122(1)(5). Assessment. Amendment of assessment. Selection of case for audit

Per Nazir Ahmad, Judicial Member; Javed Iqbal, Chairman agreeing; Abdul Nasir Butt, Accountant Member, disagreeing on the issue of “selection of cases for Audit under S. 177, ITO Ord.2001 ” [Majority View]-Assessment. Amendment of Read More...


2018 PTD 2096
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 MESSRS UNITED FINISHING MILL, NANKANA SAHIB
VS
THE C.I.R., R.T.O., LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.111 Addition made on account of short term loan obtained from Bank

Question for determination: When appeal had earlier been decided by the Tribunal only on the legal plane, Tribunal could not again lay its hands to other grounds of appeal which were not opted to again lay its hands to other grounds of appeal which were not opted to Read More...


2018 PTD 2096
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2018 MESSRS R.I. STEEL HATTAR
VS
C.I.R., R.T.O., ABBOTABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.131 Appeal to Appellate Tribunal. Procedure.

Appeal to Appellate Tribunal. Procedure. Law laid down by Division Bench (D.B.) of the Tribunal. Binding force. Scope Law laid down by Division Bench of Appellate Tribunal on a given issue, was binding on Division Bench of the Tribunal. If Division Bench of the Read More...


2018 PTD 2114
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2017 M/S PAKISTAN TELEVISION CORPORATION LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL), LTU, ISLAMABAD ETC.
Income Tax Act, 1922 14(2)(c) Tax deduction and collection Expenses; commission

Tax can be levied or amended under Read More...


2017 PTD 1372
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2016 Waheed Shahzad Butt
VS
The Federation of Pakistan and another
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 134A ADRC

The principles propounded in the above judgments very much underlie the objects for which FOI Ordinance was promulgated. The application by the petitioner was not responded to by the Board contrary to the command of the FOI Ordinance, which prompted him to approach Read More...


(2016)113 TAX 160
Lahore High Court 2014 Messrs MCB BANK LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 33, 34, 100-A, Sixth Schedule, Part-II, R.4 & Seventh Schedule, R.1 Tax Accounting

There is no allegation against the appellant in the show cause notice dated 30.11.2015. In the show cause notice, main contention bone of the prosecution whereas no allegation has been leveling against the appellant.
When there is no name or allegation against Read More...


2014 PTD 1874
Lahore High Court 2009 Messrs AIDY VEE & CO. (PVT.) LTD. through Director,
VS
TAXATION OFFICER OF INCOME TAX, LAHORE and 4 others
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 137, 127 STAY

In case such an application is pending respondent shall not effect the impugned recovery till the application for interim relief or appeal in question is finally decided. The Commissioner Income Tax In case such an application is pending respondent shall not Read More...


2009 PTD 1715
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2004 M. Akram Tahir, D.R.
VS
Naveed A. Andrabi
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(9A) & Second Sched.; Part IV, Cl. (59), 136 deemed income

---S. 12(9A) & Second Sched. Part IV, CI. (59)----Companies Ordinance (XLVII OF 1984), s. 245----Income deemed to accrue or arise in Read More...


2004 P T D (Trib.) 1104
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue 2002 E.U. Khawaja, C.A.
VS
Muhammad Umar Farooq, D.R
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 111 Penalty for concealment of income/ Mens rea

Maintenance of accounts on mercantile system of accountancy--Interest on Government securities---Declaration of interest on cash basis. Assessing Officer pointed out that interest on Government securities as declared was less than that Read More...


2002 PTD 713
(2002)85 TAX 125
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Ahmad Kamal, D.R.
VS
Nemo
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 19, 20, 21 Enactment has its own objectives

Precedent---Each enactment has its own objectives, philosophy and mechanism and decisions made under it are not binding on the functionaries working under another enactment until and unless the Legislature specifically so directs, Read More...


2002 PTD 716
(2002)85 TAX 145
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Ahmad Kamal, D.R.
VS
Nemo
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 19, 20, 21 Precedent---Each enactment has its own objectives, philosophy and mechanism and decisions made under it are not binding on the functionaries working u

Annual Letting Value---(ALV) assessed by Provincial and Taxation Department under Property Tax Act for the purpose of levying property tax was not binding on the Assessing Officer for the purpose of income-tax under Income Tax Ordinance, Read More...


2002 PTD 716
(2002)85 TAX 145
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Imtiaz Ahmed Barakzai, D.R.
VS
Abid Sherazi
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 24,52 Assessee/Non-cooperative

Assessment, setting aside of Justification First Appellate Authority was not justified in setting aside the assessments second time when the Read More...


2002 PTD 333
84 TAX 231
Karachi High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
Messrs MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 8, 3(1)(x), 4, 5 & 7 FBR/Apex Authority/no role in quasi-judicial function

Instructions/directions issued by Central Board of Revenue---Binding on Assessing Officers and all other Tax Authorities performing administrative functions, but not on assessee and Appellate Authorities---Central Board of Revenue is an Read More...


2002 PTD 720
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Vishno Raja Qavi, D.R.
VS
Hassan Naeem, I.T.P.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 143,66-A, 134-B, 156, SOC, 22(c), 80C Tax on tax

Income from business of profession Crossing up the receipt of “tax on tax” Department treated the assessee’s tax liability Read More...


2002 PTD 337
84 TAX 223
Karachi High Court 2002 Messrs ALNOOR SUGAR MILLS LTD., KARACHI
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, CENTRAL ZONE B, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S.4(3)(vii) & 17,5 Securities and Exchange Ordinance (XVII of 1969), S.14 Gain from Bank/ Shares of assessee

Assessee received gain from Bank earned from sale of shares of assessee in pursuance of S.14 of Securities and Exchange Ordinance. 1969-Authority found such receipt to be income Contention of assessee was that such receipt being of Read More...


2002 PTD 728
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2002 Iqbal Abadan, C.A.
VS
Dr. Fazal Abrejo, D.R.
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 5(1)(xv)(ii), 17B, clause (8A) of Part I of Second Schedule Exemption/ Foreign remittances

Exemption Assessee had created immovable assets out of foreign remittances received and had claimed exemption- Assets were partially disposed Read More...


2002 PTD 345
84 TAX 194 =
Karachi High Court 2002 Messrs ALNOOR SUGAR MILLS LTD., KARACHI
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, CENTRAL ZONE B, KARACHI
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 4, 4(3)(vii) , 17(5) Assessment

Assessment is an order through which the Revenue expresses itself on the income earned by or accrued to an assessee during a particular accounting period-Such an expression is generally based upon the declarations and affirmations made Read More...


2002 PTD 728
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Sh. Anwar ul Haq
VS
Muhammad Tahir Khan, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 111, 13(1) (aa), 138E Penalty for concealment of income

Penalty for concealment of income etc. Addition Settlement Addition made under S. 13(1) (aa) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was reduced by Read More...


2002 PTD 350
84 TAX 178
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX AND WEALTH TAX, SARGODHA ZONE, SARGODHA
VS
Messrs IRSHAD ANWAR & CO
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 2(7), 65 & 66âA, 129, 134 Assessment/ agreement

Additional assessment---Re-opening of agreed assessment---Agreed assessment though a settlement of contractual nature could not be declared to be a voluntary agreement between the Revenue and assessee fulfilling all the codal Read More...


2002 PTD 750
85 TAX 470
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Naveed Haider, A.C.A.
VS
Shaheen Aziz Niazi, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66, 62, 34 Foreign exchange gain and loss

Preamble set-off loss Foreign exchange gain and loss Assessee showed foreign exchange gain and loss Assessee showed foreign exchange gains as Read More...


2002 PTD 358
84 TAX 217
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Syed Abrar Hussain Naqvi
VS
Mrs. Iram Adnan, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 62 Appeal to AT/ Grounds of appeal

Issue raised by the assessee at the Appellate stage without having the same agitated through specific grounds of appeal would not arise out of the orders of both the Authorities below, same could not be raised before the Tribunal in Read More...


2002 PTD 764
85 TAX 256
Lahore High Court 2002 REEM RICE MILL (PVT.) LTD
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Minister of Finance, Revenue Division, Lahore and others
Law: Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 129 Salary paid to Directors in cash

Directors Deductions Admissibility- Salary paid in cash to the Directors of the company was disallowed by the Assessing Officer being not Read More...


2002 PTD 363
85 TAX 478
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Syed Abrar Hussain Naqvi
VS
Mrs. Iram Adnan, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 62 expenses

----Profit and loss expenses---Disallowance of---History of the case---Relevance---Admissibility of claim of expenses under each head for every year is to be considered independently on the basis of facts available for that Read More...


2002 PTD 764
85 TAX 256
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Bashir Ahmed
VS
Nadir Mumtaz Warraich, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 135 , 12(18A) Rectification of mistake

Disposal of appeal by the Appellate Tribunal reported case of Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal in a reference application Rectification on the Read More...


2002 PTD 373
84 TAX 235
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Syed Abrar Hussain Naqvi
VS
Mrs. Iram Adnan, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 62 Sale promotion and advertisement expenses

Sale promotion and advertisement expenses --- Five per cent . disallowance of expenses by referring to history of the case without mentioning any other reason was confirmed by the First Appellate Authority --- Validity --- Such Read More...


2002 PTD 764
85 TAX 256
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX/ WEALTH TAX, ZONE-B, LAHORE
VS
Makhdoom Zada Syed HASSAN MEHMOOD through Legal Heirs and 81 others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 136(1) , 135, 108 , 115, 117, 122 Penalty proceedings/ Civil liability

Income Tax Act of 1922 Ss. 28 & 51 Penalty proceedings Nature Penalty proceedings both under the Income-Tax Act, 1922 or Income Tax Read More...


2002 PTD 381
85 TAX 499
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Muhammad Asif, D.R.
VS
Javed Iqbal
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 55. 55(2) , (3), 59 Extension of date for filing of return

Extension of date for filing of return---Central Board of Revenue could not take away, by issuing a Circular, the powers of extending the date of filing of return vested in the Assessing Officer by S.55(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More...


2002 PTD 769
2002 TAX 140
Lahore High Court 2002 HUMAYOUN KHAN, DIRECTOR MANAKIN TEXTILES (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS
CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman and 3 others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 129 Pre-condition/ Appeal

Constitutional petition Pre-condition for filing appeal against assessment order to deposit 15% of the amount of tax assessed Petitioner Read More...


2002 PTD 385
85 TAX 483
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue 2002 Muhammad Mehtab Khan
VS
Syed Riazuddin
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 17B, 2(1)(16)(ii) Powers of Inspecting Assistant Commissioner

Powers of IAC Wealth Tax Officer's order---Net wealth---Liabilities not against any assets created by the assessee---Disallowance of---Inspecting Assistant Commissioner revised the assessment by adding the liabilities on the ground that Read More...


2002 PTD 773
85 TAX 77
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KARACHI
VS
Messrs CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 54, 88, 111, Second Sched Tax payable/ Basis of assessment

Payment of tax with return of income “Tax payable on the basis of assessment” Distinction Clear distinction exists between the Read More...


2002 PTD 388
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue 2002 A. H. Faridi
VS
Muhammad Umar Farooq, D.R
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 20, 19 Deductions / Income from house property

Salary and allowances --- Electricity expenses --- Tenant’s burdon borne by the property income and was not a business expenditure --- Salary of electrician was covered by the allownces of repair allowed against the property Income Read More...


2002 PTD 779
85 TAX 60
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KARACHI
VS
Messrs CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 54, 88, 111, Second Sched Exemption / Claim of exemption

Exemption-- Additional tax for failure to pay tax Claim of exemption Non-Payment of tax with return Assessment Rejection of exemption Levy of Read More...


2002 PTD 388
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue 2002 Kh. Muhammad Iqbal
VS
Muhammad Asif, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 31 & 23(1)(vii), Second Sched. Income from other source | Supply of electricity

Income from other source- Supply of electricity---Interest income on delayed payment of electricity bills---Taxability---Interest income is not to be considered as part and parcel of the business income and its assessment under S.30 of Read More...


2002 PTD 783
85 TAX 196
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KARACHI
VS
Messrs CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 54, 88, 111, Second Sched Penalty Concealment of income

Penalty Concealment of income Wrong claim of exemption –Effect-- Assessee, on the one hand had been allowed to claim exemption from tax Read More...


2002 PTD 388
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue 2002 Kh. Muhammad Iqbal
VS
Muhammad Asif, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 31 & 23(1)(vii), Second Sched. Exemption provision

Fiscal statute---Exemption provision---Assessee has to prove himself to be within the four corners of the exemption provisions---Unlike charging provision when an exemption clause is interpreted the doubt is resolved in favour of the Read More...


2002 PTD 783
85 TAX 196
Lahore High Court 2002 MUHAMMAD AFZAL
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, CIRCLE II, LAHORE and another
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2, 2(16) ,2(m) Assessment/ Taking over of the property by Liquadation Board

Punjab Undesirable Cooperative Societies (Dissolution) Ordinance (XXXI of 1992), Preamble Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199 Read More...


2002 PTD 397
85 TAX 32
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue 2002 MESSRS AYAN TRADING COMPANY, FAISALABAD
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 31 & 23(1)(vii), Second Sched. Interest paid on borrowed capital payment of electricity bills

Interest earned on delayed payment of electricity bills---Interest paid on borrowed capital---Deduction of interest Read More...


2002 PTD 783
85 TAX 196
Supreme Court (AJ&K) 2002 Messrs QURESHI VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX arid 3 others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 135(8), 136, 137 Appeal/ time barred

Appeal before High Court Limitation Appeals filed after more than four years from passing of orders by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Read More...


2002 PTD 399
85 TAX 397
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue 2002
VS
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 80, 80âB (1) & 80†‘B (2) (bb), 143†‘B, 50(5B), 13, 62, Second Sched., Income From encashment of foreign Exchange Bearer

Income From encashment of foreign Exchange Bearer  Certificates --- Taxability in the hands of company or registered firm --- Validity --- Amount received on encashment of FEBCs was deemed to be an income under S. 80-B (1) read with  S.80 (2) (b)(b) of the Read More...


2002 PTD 789
85 TAX 112
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Salman Pasha and-Nadeem Dawoodi
VS
Bakhat Zaman, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 14(1) & Second Sched. (129) Exemption / Subject to conditions

--- Second Sched., cl.(129)--- C.B.R. Circular No.20 of 1998 , dated 8-10-1998 --- Exemption --- words “subject to such conditions as may be specified therein” and where it is so specified” in cl (129), Second Sched. Of Read More...


2002 PTD 794
85 TAX 1
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue 2002 Salman Pasha and-Nadeem Dawoodi
VS
Bakhat Zaman, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 80, 80âB (1) & 80†‘B (2) (bb), 143†‘B, 50(5B), 13, 62, Second Sched., Exemption / Subject to conditions

--- Second Sched., cl.(129)--- C.B.R. Circular No.20 of 1998 , dated 8-10-1998 --- Exemption --- words “subject to such conditions as may be specified therein” and where it is so specified” in cl (129), Second Sched. Of Read More...


2002 PTD 789
85 TAX 112
Karachi High Court 2002 Messrs AYENBEE (PRIVATE) LIMITED
VS
INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (HEADQUARTERS), KARACHI and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 63, 61, 62, 23 Best judgment assessment

Books of account were neither denied nor produced Assessing Officer’s guess work was neither honest nor he relied upon the past history Read More...


2002 PTD 407
86 TAX 117
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Shaukat Amin, F.C.A.
VS
Muhammad Asif; D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 14(1) & Second Sched. (129) Exemption / Subject to conditions

--- Ss. 156, 14(1) & Second Sched ., cl. (129) --- C.B.R Circular No.20, dated  8-10-1998 --- Rectification application --- Calculation of export rebate --- Inclusion of wealth tax for determining the total income for purpose of Read More...


2002 PTD 794
85 TAX 1
Karachi High Court 2002 Messrs AYENBEE (PRIVATE) LIMITED
VS
INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (HEADQUARTERS), KARACHI and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 63, 61, 62, 23 Trading account Rejection

Refection of accounts Trading account Rejection of claim of profit and loss expenses on account of its being disproportionate to the quantum Read More...


2002 PTD 407
86 TAX 117
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
ABDUL HAMID
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 15(c), 19 & 136(1), 19 Income from house property

Income from “ house property” --- Shop purchased by assesse was being used by his son for business --- Assessee did not disclose income from shop , but Assessing Officer added rental value thereof in his business income --- Read More...


2002 PTD 798
85 TAX 258
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES ZONE-II, KARACHI
VS
Messrs SINDH ENGINEERING (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, First Sched.,B(1), 136(2), 65(1)(a)(b), 136 Re-opening of assessment / Public company

Re-opening of assessment Assessee was initially assessed as public company entitled to 5% rebate of super tax Subsequently, it transpired Read More...


2002 PTD 419
85 TAX 386
2002 SCMR 527
Karachi High Court 2002 A. REHMAN alias ABDULLAH and another
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 59-D, 13, 129 59-D, 13, 129 Tax Amnesty Scheme

Tax Amnesty. Scheme, 2000 (C.B.R. Circular No.4, dated 1-3-2000), Para. 10(3) ---Words "issued" and "received" in para. 10(3), Tax Amnesty Scheme, 2000---Connotation---Word "issued"used in para. 10(3) of the Scheme with respect to Read More...


2002 PTD 804
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2002 Messrs PRIME DAIRIES ICE CREAM LTD., LAHORE
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES ZONE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 137 Appeal to Supreme Court

Petition to High Court for declaring the case fit for appeal to Supreme Court Essentials Such petition must contain all the grounds on which such certificate is sought Being an important document, which has to be ultimately treated as Read More...


2002 PTD 430
85 TAX 509
Karachi High Court 2002 A. REHMAN alias ABDULLAH and another
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 59-D, 13, 129 59-D, 13, 129 Tax Amnesty Scheme

Tax Amnesty Scheme, 2000 (C.B.R. Circular No.4, dated 1-3-2000), paras. 8 & 10---C.B.R. Circular No.9 of 2000, dated 31-5-2000, para. 2(c)---C.B.R. Circular No.1 of 2001, dated 29-2-2001, para. 2---Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963), Read More...


2002 PTD 804
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2002 MUHAMMAD IMRAN KHAN
VS
SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 73, 73(3), 138, 73 Liability of successor

Succession to business, otherwise than on death Assessment in the name of predecessor Validity Assessment in the name of predecessor was invalid, where the business was carried on by the successor and Return for that very year was also Read More...


2002 PTD 435
Karachi High Court 2002 A. REHMAN alias ABDULLAH and another
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 59-D, 13, 129 59-D, 13, 129 Tax Amnesty Scheme

Constitutional petitions challenging. orders of rejection of declarations filed under Tax Amnesty Scheme, 2000-Department's objection was that impugned orders were open to appeal under S. 129 of the Ordinance, thus, Constitutional Read More...


2002 PTD 804
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES, LAHORE
VS
MUHAMMAD IQBAL DAR
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 13, 13(1)(d) Independent approvals of the IAC

Income Tax Act (XI of 1922), S.4 (2D) Addition Value of property-- Approval of I.A.C. Two separate and independent approvals of the Read More...


2002 PTD 439
Karachi High Court 2002 A. REHMAN alias ABDULLAH and another
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 59-D, 13, 129 59-D, 13, 129 Interpretation of statue

No provision of a statute should be considered in isolation, until and unless any section/provision thereof is a complete code in itself Any Scheme contained in a statute or subordinate legislation should be considered in totality of the Read More...


2002 PTD 804
Lahore High Court 2002 DEANS ASSOCIATES (PVT.) LIMITED
VS
INSPECTING ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RANGE NO.1, COMPANY ZONE I, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66A Show-cause notice/ Constitutional petition

Constitutional petition show-cause notice When Constitutional petition and show cause notice were put in just a position, then it brings the Read More...


2002 PTD 441
Lahore High Court 2002 Mrs. ADEEBA EHSAN
VS
INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE and 3 others
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 5(1)(xii), 17B Powers of IAC to revise Wealth Tax Officer’s order

Powers of IAC to revise Wealth Tax Officer’s order Assessment year 1991-92 Validity Section 17B of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963 enacted Read More...


2002 PTD 453
87 TAX 32
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2002 Messrs POLY PACK (PVT.) LIMITED
VS
SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 2(3)(ii), 9(ii)(a) Non-payment of refund

Refund to assessee---Maladministration---Department's action of "deliberate withholding or non-payment of refund" was based on irrelevant grounds which fell under the definition of 'maladministration' as per S.2(3)(ii) of the Establishment of the Office of Federal Read More...


2002 PTD 824
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Asif Bhatti, I.T.P.
VS
Javed-ur-Rehman, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 134(6), 66A Interim order is part/ Judicial system

Interim order Interim order is part of working of judicial system and for that purpose no separate or specific provision is necessary to empower a Court to issue an Interim order Even in the absence of any such specific provision, a Read More...


2002 PTD 458
85 TAX 11
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 M. A. Hadi, F.C.A.
VS
Anwar Ali Shah, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18), 66‑A National Tax Number

Deemed income---If an assessee was able to prove that the amount paid by him was through cross cheque the other requirements i.e. to intimate the National Tax Number were not to be invoked---Language of relevant law is disjunctive and not Read More...


2002 PTD 827
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE-C, LAHORE
VS
Messrs JINNAH CADET SCHOOL, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 131, 136 Admission of additional evidence

Reference to High Court Admission of additional evidence Nothing had been brought on record to show that objection against the admission of Read More...


2002 PTD 462
85 TAX 489
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 M. A. Hadi, F.C.A.
VS
Anwar Ali Shah, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18), 66 National Tax Number

Powers of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner's order---Deemed income---Share deposit money was received through cross cheque---Inspecting Additional Commissioner cancelled the order of Assessing Officer on Read More...


2002 PTD 827
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES, LAHORE
VS
Messrs NIRALA (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 136(1) Question of fact

Reference to High Court /Question of fact --- Question whether the assessee was  a manufacture Read More...


2002 PTD 464
85 TAX 467
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
S. SANKARAN
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 271, 271(1)(c) Concealment of Income

Concealment of Income ----Mere addition to Income at the instance of assessee would not warrant a finding of concealment of Income Penalty cannot be levied under S.271 (1)(c) --- Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 ,S.271(1) (c) 
In the Read More...


2002 PTD 831
241 ITR 825
Lahore High Court 2002 E.M.E. COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. through Secretary
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance, Islamabad and 4 others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 2(16)(b) Cooperative Society/ Companies

Cooperative Societies Act (VII of 1925), Preamble/Company/Status of Cooperative Society/Societies registered under the provisions of Read More...


2002 PTD 466
85 TAX 491
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
MATHURANTAKAM COOPERATIVE SUGAR MILLS LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 Business Expenditure / Disallowance

Business---Expenditure---Disallowance---Expenditure on maintenance of residential accommodation in the nature of a guest house---Effect of S.37(4)---Section 37(4), would cover expenditure on purchase of provisions for giving refreshments Read More...


2002 PTD 833
241 ITR 817
Gujarat High Court (India) 2002 SHREE NIKETAN
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 24 Property/ Unrealised rent

---Property --- Deduction --- Unrealised rent ---Institution of legal proceedings against tenant is sufficient---No obligation on assessee to prove decree Notice to tenant to vacate in March, 1972---Suit instituted during previous year. relevant to assessment year Read More...


2002 PTD 841
82 TAX 336
241 ITR 355
Kerala High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 19, 20, X1(1) , 154 Banking company/ Interest on securities

Rectification of mistake--Purchase and sale of securities in course of business of banking---Securities held as stock-in-trade---Interest paid for broken period on purchase of securities---Deductible as business.
-Rectification to Read More...


2002 PTD 848
82 TAX 384
241 ITR 374
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2002 INSPECTING ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and others
VS
Messrs MICRO PAK (PVT.). LIMITED and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18) Share deposit money

Share deposit money---Deeming such sums as "loan" or "advance"---Show-cause notices were issued to assessees on the point that introduction of "share deposit money" over and above the authorised capital otherwise than by crossed cheques Read More...


2002 PTD 877
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2002 Muhammad Asif, D.R.
VS
NEMO
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1981 20(2) Valuation of property

Valuation of Read More...


2002 PTD 882
Supreme Court of India 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
DOONGAJI & CO
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 32 Association for promoting the game of cricket

-Assessee---Association registered under Bombay Public Trusts Act/Granted certificate under S.80G of Income Tax Act as established for Read More...


2002 PTD 512
250 ITR 750
Supreme Court of India 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
NOVELTY JEWELLERS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 263 Items not subject-matter of issue before Commissioner

Revision---Assessment pursuant to order in revision/Assessing Officer/Whether can make addition of items not subject-matter of issue before Read More...


2002 PTD 521
250 ITR 781
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
CHOHAN FLYING COACH SERVICES
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 65, 65(2) Definite information/ reopening of assessment

Test to determine definite nature of information---Requirements of S.65 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979.The phrase "definite information" refers to the information, which is sine qua non for the purpose of re-opening. That information Read More...


2002 PTD 951
Supreme Court of India 2002 INCOME-TAX OFFICER and another
VS
K.L. SRIHARI (HUF) and others
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 147, 215 Reassessment/ Interest for delay in filing return

Reassessment/Fresh order of assessment of entire income of assessee/Effect/Original assessment order gets effaced/Indian Income Tax Act, Read More...


2002 PTD 522
250 ITR 193
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Abdul Khaliq Khatri
VS
Fahimul Haque, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 24 Deduction/ Office expenses

Head Office expenses----Assessee a non-resident company----Assessee claimed Head Office expenses in the computation chart and not in the profit and loss account---Admissibility----Assessee was not entitled to claim Head Office expenses Read More...


2002 PTD 1029
85 TAX 202
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2002 M/s BILZ (PVT.) LTD.
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MULTAN and another
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50(4A), 52, 86 185(3) Deduction of tax at source

Assessee in default---Show-cause notice for recovery of advance income-tax not deducted at source---Failure to identify the names of the parties Read More...


2002 PTD 1
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2002 M/s BILZ (PVT.) LTD.
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MULTAN and another
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50(4A), 52, 86 185(3) Fiscal statute---Interpretation

Fiscal statute has to be construed in its true perspective and in respect of payment of tax, if it is found due, against a part, then such Read More...


2002 PTD 1
Karachi High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 workers’ welfare fund

---Welfare fund, levy of---Assessing Officer---Jurisdiction---Assessing Officer under S.4 of the Workers’ Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971, Read More...


2002 PTD 14
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
D. RAMASAMY REDDIAR (DECEASED) and another
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 271(1)(c) , 274. Penalty proceedings

Concealment of income/Law applicable/Jurisdiction to levy penalty/Penalty proceedings pending before IAC on 31-3-1976/-Effect of omission of subsection (2) of S.274 with effect from 1/1976/-IAC competent to continue with proceedings and Read More...


2002 PTD 1038
241 ITR 361
82 TAX 280
Karachi High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 Workers’ Welfare Fund

Levy of workers’ Read More...


2002 PTD 14
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
N. SWAMY
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Income from undisclosed sources

Income from undisclosed sources--Addition due to difference between value of stock as recorded in books and as found in declaration to bank for getting overdraft/Burden of proof on Revenue/-Could not be discharged by merely referring to Read More...


2002 PTD 1040
82 TAX 282
241 ITR 363
Karachi High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 Workers’ Welfare Fund

Levy of Workers’ Welfare Fund on income exempted under the Sched. II of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Counsel for the assessee conceded Read More...


2002 PTD 14
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
N. SWAMY
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Acceptance of explanation of assessee by Tribunal

Acceptance of explanation of assessee by Tribunal-----Question of fact---The assessee’s income is to be assessed by the Income-tax Officer on the basis of the material which is required to be considered for the purpose of Read More...


2002 PTD 1040
82 TAX 282
241 ITR 363
Karachi High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 Workers’ Welfare Fund

Levy of Workers’ Read More...


2002 PTD 14
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
P.A.C. RAMASAMY RAJA EDUCATION CHARITY TRUST
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 11, 256 (2) Charitable purposes

Charitable purposes/Finding that income of trust had been accumulated and that balance had been applied for charitable purposes/Tribunal was justified in granting exemption to charitable trust/No question of law arose/Indian Income Tax Read More...


2002 PTD 1044
82 TAX 444
241 ITR 416
Karachi High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 Workers’ Welfare Fund

Workers’ Welfare Fund---Determination of---Assessing Officer under S.4(4) of the Workers’ Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971, is under Read More...


2002 PTD 14
Kerala High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
JOHNY JOSEPH
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 2, 23 Property Annual letting value

Annual letting value/Basis for determination/Law applicable/-Effect of amendment of S.23 in 1975/-Actual rent will be deemed to be annual value if it is in excess of sum for which property might reasonably be expected to be let/-Indian Read More...


2002 PTD 1049
82 TAX 462
241 ITR 423
Karachi High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 Workers’ Welfare Fund

Workers’ Welfare Fund---Determination of---Assessing Officer under S.4(4) of the Workers’ Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971, is under Read More...


2002 PTD 14
Madras High Court (India) 2002 T.V. SUNDARAM IYENGAR & SONS LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 22, 256 Property/Let out to an associate

Property/Finding that large building had been let out to an associate company on a very low rent/Tribunal justified in remanding matter for determination of reasonable rent/No question of law arose/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 22 Read More...


2002 PTD 1052
82 TAX 459
241 ITR 420
Karachi High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 Duties/ obligations

---Duties/obligations Read More...


2002 PTD 14
Madras High Court (India) 2002 T.V. SUNDARAM IYENGAR & SONS LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 22, 256 Property/Let out to an associate

Property/Finding that large building had been let out to an associate company on a very low rent/Tribunal justified in remanding matter for determination of reasonable rent/No question of law arose/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 22 Read More...


2002 PTD 1052
82 TAX 459
241 ITR 420
Lahore High Court 2002 Messrs HAMEED MASOOD LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE; LAHORE and another
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136(2) Rejection of accounts

Constitutional Read More...


2002 PTD 41
Bombay High Court (India) 2002 G.M. BREWERIES LTD. and another
VS
UNION OF INDIA and others
Income Tax Ordinance 131 Inquiry/ Powers of Income Tax Authorities

/Powers of Income Tax Authorities under S.131/Condition precedent for exercise of power/Proceedings under Income-Tax Act must be pending/No pending proceedings/No application of mind by ITO/Notice under S.131 was not valid/Indian Read More...


2002 PTD 1055
82 TAX 603
241 ITR 446
Karachi High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
Messrs UNILEVER P.L.C. U.K.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 163 Permanent establishment / Visit of the expatriates

Permanent establishment”---Connotation---Term “permanent establishment” denotes a branch, management, factory or other fixed Read More...


2002 PTD 44
Delhi High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
GOYAL GASES (P.) LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 271 Penalty Concealment of income

-Concealment of income/Return income of about twenty five lakhs of rupees enhanced by nearly thirty eight lakhs/Tribunal deleting penalty without applying Expln. 1 to S.271(1)(c) for assessment year 1989-90/Question whether deletion of Read More...


2002 PTD 1060
82 TAX 611
241 ITR 451
Karachi High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
Messrs UNILEVER P.L.C. U.K.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 163 Arguments

Reference---Appeal---Argument neither raised in the grounds of appeal nor arising out of the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, has no Read More...


2002 PTD 44
Madras High Court (India) 2002 E. PRAHALATHA BABU
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 132 Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme Delay in payment

---Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997/Delay in payment of tax/Delay not a long one/Declarant having reasonable explanation for Read More...


2002 PTD 1064
83 TAX 88
241 ITR 457
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2002 Shahid Zaheer, D.R.
VS
Shahid Abbas
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 23 value of lands and buildings

Determination of value of land and building with fixtures and fittings---Principles---Rule 8(3) of the Wealth Tax Rules, 1963 prescribes the Read More...


2002 PTD 54
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
KASTHURI & SONS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 Capital or revenue expenditure

Interest on borrowed capital/Assessee borrowing money for purpose of setting up a printing facsimile unit/-Interest paid allowable as revenue expenditure/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37.
The assessee established a printing facsimile Read More...


2002 PTD 1070
241 ITR 412
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2002 G. A. Jally
VS
Dr. Ikram Ghani, D.R.
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(m), 5, Second Schedule, 3 Economic Reforms Act/ Foreign currency account

Foreign currency account in Pakistan---Exemption---allowed in respect of foreign currency account in Pakistan from the charge of wealth tax by Read More...


2002 PTD 58
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SOUTHERN SHIPPING CO. (P.) LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Pronote providing for payment interest

Income/Pronote seized during search operations/-Pronote providing for payment interest/-Evidence from books of account of M that such interest had been paid to assessee/-Interest was assessable as income of assessee/Indian Income Tax Read More...


2002 PTD 1072
241 ITR 464
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2002 G. A. Jally
VS
Dr. Ikram Ghani, D.R.
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(m), 5, Second Schedule, 3 Immunity granted to Foreign Currency Accounts

Immunity granted to Foreign Currency Accounts---Intention of Legislature---By enacting subsection (2) of S.5, Protection of Economic Reforms Read More...


2002 PTD 58
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SOUTHERN SHIPPING CO. (P.) LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 payment of interest

Held, that the pronote stipulated payment of interest. The entries in the account books of M in the normal course of business revealed the payment of interest of Rs.67,790 to the assessee-company. The mere fact that the correct Read More...


2002 PTD 1072
241 ITR 464
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2002 G. A. Jally
VS
Dr. Ikram Ghani, D.R.
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(m), 5, Second Schedule, 3 Interpretation of statutes/ favour of the assessee.

---Fiscal statutes to be strictly interpreted and in case of substantial deficiencies in the wordings, such statute is to be interpreted Read More...


2002 PTD 58
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) 2002 VOLTAS LTD. (formerly Hyderabad Allwayn Ltd.)
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX and another
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 Delay/to be condoned

Delay of 26 days in filing application---Section 256 allows condonation of delay up to 30 days after time limit/Provision for condonation of delay to be liberally construed/Finding that delay was due to mistake of counsel/Delay condoned/-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More...


2002 PTD 1076
82 TAX 593
241 ITR 471
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2002 G. A. Jally
VS
Dr. Ikram Ghani, D.R.
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(m), 5, Second Schedule, 3 Registration of firms

“The amendment made in subsection (1) clarifies that the instrument of partnership shall be in writing. Subsection (4) has also been Read More...


2002 PTD 58
Supreme Court of India 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
KARNATAKA STATE COOPERATIVE APEX BANK
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 80 Cooperative society/Special deduction

Cooperative society/Special deduction/Scope of Cooperative society engaged in banking business/Interest arising from investment made out of reserve fund to enable it to carry on banking business/-Is income from banking Read More...


2002 PTD 1079
251 ITR 194
Supreme Court of India 2002 K.P. MADHUSUDHANAN
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 143, 271 Penalty Concealment of income

Deemed concealment under Explanation/Notice for imposition of penalty--Specific reference to Explanation dealing with deemed concealment not necessary/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.271(1)(c). Expln. 1. cl. (B)-[ CIT, v. P.M. Shah (1993) Read More...


2002 PTD 1082
251 ITR 99
Supreme Court of India 2002 INCOME TAX OFFICER
VS
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 2(7), (28A), 194A, 201, 240, 244(lA), (3) & 244A. Interest paid to buyers for period of delay

Development Authority constructing flats and allotting them to buyers/Interest paid to buyers for period of delay/Failure to deduct tax at source/Notice of demand for tax and recovery.--Development Authority an "assessee"- Appellate Read More...


2002 PTD 1088
251 ITR 772
Supreme Court of India 2002 KHODEY BREWING AND DISTILLING INDUSTRIES LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Income-tax Interest/Delay in filing return

Interest----Delay in filing return----Deficiency in paying advance tax-----Assessment order Direction for charging interest for delay and Read More...


2002 PTD 524
Supreme Court of India 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
STELLER INVESTMENT LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 (2) Black money into white

Subscribed capital/Increase/Tribunal finding not a device for converting black money into white with the being of investment company/No question of law arises -Indian Income Tu Act, 1961, S.256(2).
From the decision of the High Court Read More...


2002 PTD 1094
261 ITR 263
Supreme Court of India 2002 GANGABAI CHARITIES
VS
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Wealth tax Exemption/ Charitable trust

Purpose not confined to religious or chartiable use----Property could be used for social, cultural and allied purposes at sole discretion of Read More...


2002 PTD 526
Supreme Court of India 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
RAJARAM MAIZE PRODUCTS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 28 Subsidy to new industries

The respondent-firm, which manufactured starch, liquid glucose and cattle feed, started a new unit for manufacture and sale of dextro mono hydrate. It received power subsidy from the State of M.P. under a scheme whereunder subsidy was Read More...


2002 PTD 1095
251 ITR 427
Supreme Court of India 2002 M.R.M. PLANTATIONS (P) LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 104 Company/ Undistributed profits

Undistributed profits----Additional tax----Investment company---sale of house properties and rubber plantation----Profits from sale brought Read More...


2002 PTD 527
250 ITR 521
Calcutta High Court (India) 2002 STAR PAPER MILLS LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 Tax deduction

Business expenditure--Royalty payable to State Government-State > Government having unilateral power to fix royalty:-Dispute regarding enhancement of royalty and lack of entry in accounts-Not relevant Enhanced royalty is a Read More...


2002 PTD 1096
252 ITR 337
Lahore High Court 2002 Messrs MIAN CONTRACTORS, LAHORE
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE-A, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 136(1) , (2) gross receipts of the contractor

Reference to High Court----Question of law----Amount deducted by the Highway Department out of total contract receipt on account of supply of Read More...


2002 PTD 529
(2001)84 TAX 493
Supreme Court of India 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SRI RAMDAS MOTOR TRANSPORT LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 132, 256 Search and seizure

Search and seizure/Law applicable/Explanation added with effect from April 1, 1989, enabling examination of person not merely in respect of books, documents or assets found in premises searched/Whether applicable where search conducted Read More...


2002 PTD 1104
251 ITR 428
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Zia Haider Rizvi
VS
NEMO
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66A(IA), 62, 135 Cancellation of assessment

Powers of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner’s order---Issue whether the Read More...


2002 PTD 99
Lahore High Court 2002 Haji MEHR DIN
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE-A, LAHORE
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1981 14 Additional ground

Grounds which may be taken in appeal----Additional ground----Appellate Tribunal refused to entertain the additional ground for the reason Read More...


2002 PTD 541
84 TAX 471
Supreme Court of India 2002 MEHSANAN DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD
VS
INCOME-TAX OFFICER
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 80 Interest earned from funds utilized for statutory reserves

Cooperative society/Special deduction-Cooperative society engaged in banking business Interest earned from funds utilized for statutory reserves Income from hiring safe deposit vaults-Deductible/ Interest from utilization of voluntary reserves Deductible if funds Read More...


2002 PTD 1106
251 ITR 522
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Muhammad Asif
VS
Muhammad Iqbal Khawaja and Faisal Iqbal Khawaja, C.A.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 80D Turnover tax/ Reserve in balance-sheet

Turnover tax----Provision for taxation----Reserve in balance-sheet-----Determination----Amount of provision for taxation to be correctly Read More...


2002 PTD 546
84 TAX 248
Lahore High Court 2002 ARIF NIZAMI
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, LAHORE and another
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66-A, 59, 59-A, 62, 63, 64, 129 , 134 Constitutional petition maintainability

Constitutional petition---Maintainability--Show-cause notice under S.66-A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 for re-opening of return filed under Self-Assessment Scheme-Contention of assessee was that after filing such return, Authority Read More...


2002 PTD 1185
85 TAX 330
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Muhammad Fareed
VS
Inayatullah Kashani, D.R.
Law: Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 54, 66A, 59(1), 134 Short payment of tax

Powers of IAC to revise Deputy Commissioner's order-Universal Self-Assessment Scheme Assessment year 1999-2000-Short payment of tax-Loss of Revenue Inspecting Additional Commissioner cancelled the assessment order passed under S 59(1) of Read More...


2002 PTD 1186
85 TAX 214
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Agha Hidayatullah, D.R.
VS
Makhdoom Hasamul Haq
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) null Conversion of agricultural land / Sikni-Residential

Status of land-Conversion of status of land-Conversion of agricultural land into non-agricultural Sikni-Residential land-Entries in record of rights/Form VII or Form I-Valuation-Land declared as agricultural land was in the process of Read More...


2002 PTD 1192
85 TAX 193
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Nemo
VS
Assessee
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 23(1), 30, 80-D, Second Sched., Cl. (118-D) Interest income

Interest income earned by the company did not constitute the company’s business income and no expenses, therefore, were allowable under Read More...


2002 PTD 107
Lahore High Court 2002 IFTIKHAR AHMAD BUTT and 4 others
VS
GOVERNMENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Economic Affairs and Statistics, Islamabad and 5 others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 2(24), Second Sched. Golden Handshake Scheme

Central Board of Revenue Read More...


2002 PTD 562
(2002)85 TAX 332
Lahore High Court 2002 MUHAMMAD INAYATULLAH CHEEMA
VS
Sardar ALI RAZA MASOOD QAZILBASH
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 129,134, 55, 61 Constitutional petition/appeal pending

Assessee filed return of total income and after providing further information in response to notice issued under S.61 of the Income Tax Ordinance, assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer--Assessee challenged assessment order Read More...


2002 PTD 1195
86 TAX 241
Lahore High Court 2002 IFTIKHAR AHMAD BUTT and 4 others
VS
GOVERNMENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Economic Affairs and Statistics, Islamabad and 5 others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 2(24), Second Sched. Golden Handshake/ Deduction of tax/legal fiction

Central Board of Revenue Circular No.15 of 1997, dated 16-11-1997 Payments made to employees under Golden Handshake Scheme/Deduction of tax Read More...


2002 PTD 562
(2002)85 TAX 332
Karachi High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
Messrs B.C.C.I. OVERSEAS LTD
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 13, 13(1)(a) Finding of Tribunal

Reference/appeal Maintainability -Finding of Tribunal was primarily based on the appreciation of as Observation of Tribunal in respect of applicability of S13(a) of the Income Tax Ordinance. 1979 were in accordance with law-No Read More...


2002 PTD 1197
86 TAX 224
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
ATEED RIAZ
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 62, 132, 135 , 136, 136(1)(2) Rectification of order

Rectification of Read More...


2002 PTD 570
(2002)86 TAX 130
Karachi High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
Messrs B.C.C.I. OVERSEAS LTD
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 13, 13(1)(a) Partial deductions/ Various recipients

Reference Question of law Requirement-Authority found the assessee-company to have withheld Tax at a  lesser you from its dealers Tribunal was of the view that Department  had made credit  in the cases of recipients to the Read More...


2002 PTD 1197
86 TAX 224
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
ATEED RIAZ
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 62, 132, 135 , 136, 136(1)(2) Reference to High Court/Limitation

Tribunal Passed order under S.135 of the Ordinance on 21-9-2000/No reference application under S.136(1) in respect of any question of law Read More...


2002 PTD 570
(2002)86 TAX 130
Lahore High Court 2002 GHAFFAR HUSSAIN
VS
REGIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EASTERN REGION), LAHORE and another
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 157, 157(2)(a) (iv), 157(3)(a) Authorized representative | Advocate

Authorized representative of assesse--Scope Legal practitioner entitled to practice in any Civil Court in Pakistan is included among, the authorized representatives under the provision of S.157(2)(a) (iv) of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More...


2002 PTD 1205
86 TAX 239
Lahore High Court 2002 Messrs MUSLIM INSURANCE CO. LTD., LAHORE
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, COYS. III, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 26(a), First Sched, Fourth Sched., 5 Insurance company/Income from dividend

Insurance company/General insurance business/Income from dividend and NIT Units in assessment year 1992-93/Chargeability to tax/-Special Read More...


2002 PTD 577
(2002)85 TAX 273
Lahore High Court 2002 Messrs CRESCENT ART FABRICS (PVT.) LTD
VS
INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE and 2 others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65 , 136(1) Withdrawal of Reference/ Constitutional petition

Constitutional petition-Petition filed after withdrawal of reference- Maintainability Re-opening of assessment---After having been un successful before the Appellate Tribunal, the assessee preferred Income Tax Reference before High Read More...


2002 PTD 1206
87 TAX 222
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Mian Mukhtar, I.T.P.
VS
Agha Hadayatullah, D.R.
Wealth Tax Rules, 1963 2(16), 2(24), 3, 7, Second Sched., 8(3), Rental income/ Exemption for self-occupied

C.B.R. Circular No. 11 of 1994, Read More...


2002 PTD 586
85 TAX 232
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RAWALPINDI
VS
Mst. SHAKEELA BANO
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 56, 61, 135, 136(1) Service of notice on assessee

Scope Question of law not raised before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Effect Dispute was with regard to service of notice on assessee under S.56 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Tribunal having found that the notice was never served upon the assessee, dismissed the Read More...


2002 PTD 1209
87 TAX 304
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Aslam Anwar
VS
Abdul Jaleel, D.R.
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(1)(16)(ii) Interpretations/favor of assessee

Principle that "where two equally Read More...


2002 PTD 598
85 TAX 171
Calcutta High Court (India) 2002 Smt. TAPATIPAL
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 159, 271(1)(c)., 254 Deemed assessee

Appeal to Appellate Tribunal-Powers of Tribunal--Power to remand New plea raised for first time before Tribunal in penalty proceedings that assessee was ill during relevant period---Tribunal justified in remanding matter to Assessing Read More...


2002 PTD 1216
82 TAX 589
241 ITR 468
Karachi High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
Messrs ZAFA PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES (PVT.) LTD.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 23, 136(1) expenses of advertising and sales promotion

Disallowance of expenses with reference to R.33 of Drugs (Licensing, Registering and Advertising) Rules, 1976---Validity---Rule 33 of the Drugs Read More...


2002 PTD 117
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
NAGI REDDI CHARITIES
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 2, 2(24), 11, 12, 13, 13(1)(bb) Exemption/Charitable purpose

Exemption-Charitable purpose---Charitable trust-Copyrights in films assigned to trust subject to distribution arrangements made by donors prior to such assignment-Monies received by trust under assignment directed specifically to be held Read More...


2002 PTD 1220
83 TAX 92
241 ITR 431
Karachi High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
Messrs ZAFA PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES (PVT.) LTD.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 23, 136(1) Allowances paid to medical representatives

Drugs (Licensing, Registering and Advertising) Rules, 1976, R.33---Reference to High Court---Question whether Tribunal was justified to confirm Read More...


2002 PTD 117
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) 2002 SHARADA PULLELA
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 273A Penalty Waiver or reduction of penalty

Penalty Interest Waiver or reduction of penalty or interest Commissioner of Income-tax must decide application for such waiver or rejection on merits Rejection of application without application of mind is not valid Indian Income Tax Read More...


2002 PTD 1225
82 TAX 595
241 ITR 473
Delhi High Court (India) 2002 S.V. MUZUMDAR
VS
TAX RECOVERY OFFICER And Others
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 220 Purchase of property attached by dept.

Recovery of tax Writ Attachment and sale of property Aggrieved person can appeal against order of attachment and proclamation of sale Writ would not issue to quash order Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.220, Sched. 11, R. 85 Constitution Read More...


Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Mohiuddin Siddiqui
VS
Ghulam, Appraiser
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 8(1)(a)(b) , 8 , 2(16) ,7 Order of the Larger Bench

Contradictions between order of Division Bench and Larger Bench of Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in respect of valuation of property---Order of Read More...


2002 PTD 111
Delhi High Court (India) 2002 S.V. MUZUMDAR
VS
TAX RECOVERY OFFICER and others
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 220 Purchase of property attached by dept.

Recovery of tax-Writ-Attachment and sale of property--Aggrieved person can appeal against order of attachment and proclamation of sale--- Writ would not issue to quash order-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.220, Sched. 11, R. Read More...


2002 PTD 1229
241 ITR 481
Lahore High Court 2002 Messrs CAVALRY SUPER STORE
VS
THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE-1, ZONE, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65 Assessment/ infructuous

Constitutional petition---Re-opening of assessment---During the pendency of Constitutional petition assessment order had already been passed by Read More...


2002 PTD 133
Bombay High Court (India) 2002 NATIONAL LEATHER CLOTH MANUFACTURING CO
VS
INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH and others
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 147, 148 Reassessment Scientific research

Reassessment Scientific research Donation to approved institution for scientific research-Claim for deduction under S.35(1)(ii) granted Withdrawal of approval with retrospective effect to institution to which donation was granted Read More...


2002 PTD 1230
241 ITR 482
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2002 Sameera Yasia, D.R.
VS
Rashid Sarwar, F.C.A.
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 16(3), 3 inherited properties

Inclusion of value in net wealth of inherited properties under litigation for partition and possession---Assessee showed only his share in the Read More...


2002 PTD 134
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) 2002 CHANDRA MOHAN
VS
UNION OF INDIA and others
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 140, 240 Refund/Amount paid as tax could not be refunded..

Refund-Section 240 would apply only where refund becomes due as a result of an order passed in appeal or other proceeding under Indian Income- tax Act--Return filed and tax paid by assessee-No order of assessment within period of Read More...


2002 PTD 1233
82 TAX 465
241 ITR 484
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2002 Sameera Yasia, D.R.
VS
Rashid Sarwar, F.C.A.
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 16(3), 3 Interpretation of statutes/ hardship and harshness

Plea of hardship and harshness cannot provide justification for ignoring the law as enacted by the Legislature---When a law enacted by the Read More...


2002 PTD 134
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
RAJAPALAYAM MILLS LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32 Depreciation

Actual cost Subsidy Not liable to be reduced from actual cost of assets for determination of depreciation Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32. Held, that the assessment orders allowing depreciation without reducing the SIPCOT subsidy Read More...


2002 PTD 1239
82 TAX 472
241 ITR 492
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Akhtar Hussain
VS
NEMO
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18), 66A , 59A House building advance

Applicability of S.66A, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Inspecting Additional Commissioner could always probe into the matter and judge the Read More...


2002 PTD 141
Calcutta High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
CURRENCY INVESTMENT CO. LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 (1) Business loss

Loss on account of dealing in shares/Identity of purchaser and seller not disputed/Failure to produce broker through whom shares were sold Read More...


2002 PTD 1241
82 TAX 474
241 ITR 494
Lahore High Court 2002 MONTGOMERY FLOUR AND GENERAL MILLS LIMITED, LAHORE
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman, Central Board of Revenue, Islamabad and 3 others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 5, 52, 50(1)(4)(4A), 52, 5(a)(b) Assessee in default

Assessee in default---On failure to make deduction at source the payer becomes an assessee in default to the extent of that much amount which Read More...


2002 PTD 155
Kerala High Court (India) 2002 OCEANIC PRODUCTS EXPORTING CO
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 68 Cash credits Burden of proof

Cash credits/Effect of S.68/Burden of proof/Burden on assessee to prove source of credits and credit worthiness of lenders/Alleged creditors fishermen who were not capable of lending substantial amounts/Finding by Tribunal that cash Read More...


2002 PTD 1244
82 TAX 477
241 ITR 497
Lahore High Court 2002 MONTGOMERY FLOUR AND GENERAL MILLS LIMITED, LAHORE
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman, Central Board of Revenue, Islamabad and 3 others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 5, 52, 50(1)(4)(4A), 52, 5(a)(b) Notice of monitoring tax deductions

Notice of assessee demanding challan of payment under S.50 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 by the Assessing Officer having the jurisdiction Read More...


2002 PTD 155
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Muhammad Tahir Khan, D.R.
VS
Riffat Hussain Malik
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 108, 108(b), , 139 , 142 Penalty/ No serious prejudice

Jurisdiction of tax Recovery Read More...


2002 PTD 616
(2002)85 TAX 153
Madras High Court (India) 2002 M. S. P. SENTHIL KUMAR
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 147 Appeal to Appellate Tribunal

Appeal to Appellate Tribunal/Remand/Order of remand final unless challenged through appropriate proceedings/Reassessment/Tribunal upholding jurisdiction of Income-tax Officer to reopen assessment under S.147(b) and restoring matter to Read More...


2002 PTD 1248
82 TAX 481
241 ITR 502
Lahore High Court 2002 MONTGOMERY FLOUR AND GENERAL MILLS LIMITED, LAHORE
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman, Central Board of Revenue, Islamabad and 3 others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 5, 52, 50(1)(4)(4A), 52, 5(a)(b) Concurrent jurisdiction

Jurisdiction of Income-tax Authority---Deduction of tax Authorities---Current jurisdiction not-barred---No bar is contained under S.5 of the Read More...


2002 PTD 155
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Khalid Maqbool for Appellant (in I.T.A. No.2812/LB of 2001).
VS
Sajjad Ali, D.R. for Respondent (in, I.T.A. No.2812/LB of 2001).
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 134, 8 Appeal Tribunal/ Filing of appeal by the Dept.

Issuance of Certificate of pendency of departmental appeal before filling of appeal --- Effect--- Filing of appeal by the Department Read More...


2002 PTD 625
(2002)85 TAX 68
Madras High Court (India) 2002 Smt. GOWRI RAJES and others
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 147, 254 Question concluded/ cannot be re-agitated

Appeal to Appellate Tribunal/Question concluded by earlier order of Tribunal cannot be re-agitated/Tribunal upholding jurisdiction of ITO to reopen assessment under S,147(b) and directing the Assessing Officer to make fresh assessment/No Read More...


2002 PTD 1252
82 TAX 484
241 ITR 506
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Bashir Ahmed
VS
Abdul Jalil, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18A), 12(18A) Liability / law was repealed/omitted

Where liability of the assessee was created under a law when that was in force during the assessment year under consideration such liability Read More...


2002 PTD 159
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, BZONE, LAHORE
VS
LAHORE CANTONMENT COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 166, 54, 88, 166(2)(d) , Second Sched. Income was exempt from levy of tax

Assessee declared nil income in assessment years 1976-77 to 1983-84--- Assessing Officer rejected assessee’s claim that its Income was Read More...


2002 PTD 629
(2002)85 TAX 25
Delhi High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
HINDUSTAN TIMES LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 37 Capital or revenue expenditure

Capital or revenue expenditure/Tribunal finding that  expenditure had been incurred to maintain and preserve asset/Tribunal justified in holding that expenditure was revenue in nature/No question of law arose, from its order/Indian Read More...


2002 PTD 1255
82 TAX 487
241 ITR 509
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Bashir Ahmed
VS
Abdul Jalil, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18A), 12(18A) law repealed/omitted/ tax liability

Rights and liabilities accrued and created under a provision of law cannot be taken away when that law is repealed/omitted subsequently. Read More...


2002 PTD 159
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, BZONE, LAHORE
VS
LAHORE CANTONMENT COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 166, 54, 88, 166(2)(d) , Second Sched. Registration of firm

Registration of firm-Refusal of registration/Order under S.68(4) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was not merely for granting of Read More...


2002 PTD 629
(2002)85 TAX 25
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SIMCO METERS LIMITED
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 254, 263 Revision

 Revision / Appeal/Powers of CIT/CIT can revise matter not agitated in appeal/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More...


2002 PTD 1258
82 TAX 490
241 ITR 511
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Bashir Ahmed
VS
Abdul Jalil, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18A), 12(18A) Deemed income/ Loan

Deemed income---Loan---Assessment year 1995-96---Assessee failed to repay loan within five year by 30-6-1994---Such loan was assessed as Read More...


2002 PTD 159
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Muhammad Aslam; D.R.
VS
Nemo
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 68(4), 68, 69, (5), 59 Self-assessment/immunity from special audit.

C.B.R Circular No. 5 of 1997, dated 12-7-1997 --- C.B.R. Circular No.   12 of Read More...


2002 PTD 639
(2002)85 TAX 102
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SIMCO METERS LIMITED
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 254, 263 investment allowance

Revision/Appeal to Appellate Tribunal- Manufacture of electric meters/Order withdrawing investment allowance in revision proceedings/Tribunal erroneously setting aside order of revision on ground of jurisdiction/Matter remanded to Read More...


2002 PTD 1258
82 TAX 490
241 ITR 511
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Vishno Raja Qavi, D.R.
VS
NEMO
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 52, 86, 2(6)(43) Failing to deduct or pay tax

Liability of persons failing to deduct or pay tax---Additional tax---Refund---Adjustment of---Tax payable under S.52 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More...


2002 PTD 166
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Mian Muhammad Azeem
VS
Muhammad Asif, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66, 66-A , 59A Assessment on the basis of return

Powers of IAC to revise Deputy Commissioner’s order/ Assessment on the basis of return / Self Assessment Scheme / Non Filling of wealth Read More...


2002 PTD 650
(2002)85 TAX 148
Madras High Court (India) 2002 BALASUBRAMANIA FOUNDRY
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40 Fuel surcharge for power consumption

Business expenditure/Accounting/Liability in respect of additional fuel surcharge for power consumption/Assessee following mercantile system accounting/Agreement between assesssee and Electricity Board that fuel surcharge would form part Read More...


2002 PTD 1267
241 ITR 523
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2002 Anwar-ul-Haq, D.R.
VS
Sh. Sharif Hussain
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 14, 14(2), 16, 17, 17(1)(b), 16(5) Wealth escaping assessment/ Limitation Notice

Wealth escaping assessment---Limitation---Notice under S.17(1)(a) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963 could be issued within a period of 5 years from the Read More...


2002 PTD 168
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SOUNDARYA NURSERY
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 2(1) Gratuity

Gratuity/Conditions laid down in S.40A (7)  must be fulfilled in order to claim deduction/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.40A.The assessee is not entitled to the deduction of the provision made towards the gratuity liability without Read More...


2002 PTD 1270
82 TAX 499
Karachi High Court 2002 AL-WARIS TRADERS
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Finance and Ex-Officio Chairman, C.B.R., Islamabad and 3 others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50, 50(7-A), 80-C & 162 Advance income-tax

Suit for declaration and permanent injunction-Payment of advance income-tax---Plaintiff had sought declaration to the effect that he was not Read More...


2002 PTD 173
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
S. G. SAMBANDAM & CO
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 148,163 , 172 Agricultural income

Agricultural income/Income from nurseries/Income from sale of plants grown in pots/Income from sale of seeds/Agricultural income/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.2(1).
All the products of the land which have some utility either for some Read More...


2002 PTD 1274
242 ITR 708
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
S. G. SAMBANDAM & CO
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 148,163 , 172 Non-Resident/occasional Shipping business

Representative assessee/Reassessment/Scope of S.172/Difference between agent of master of ship and agent of non-resident principal/Effect of amendment of S.172 with effect from 1-6-1975/Return filed and assessment under S.172 in Read More...


2002 PTD 1274
242 ITR 708
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Abdul Tahir, I.T.P.
VS
Mahfooz ur Rehman Pasha, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 132, 65, 156, Definite information

Information received by the Assessing Officer about discount, after the original assessment is a “definite information”. Read More...


2002 PTD 183
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Abdul Tahir, I.T.P.
VS
Mahfooz ur Rehman Pasha, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 132, 65, 156, Rectification of mistake/Appeal before Appellate Tribunal

Appeal before Appellate Tribunal---Argument in respect of rectification made by First Appellate Authority---Validity---Argument that original Read More...


2002 PTD 183
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Shahid Abbas for Appellant.
VS
Muhammad Asif; D.R. for Respondent
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 17B, Second Sched., Part I, Cl. 12(1) House-Exemption

Powers of IAC to revise Wealth Tax Officer's order Exemption--House-Exemption allowed of one self-occupied house at Lahore was cancelled by Read More...


2002 PTD 676
85 TAX 168
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SOUTHERN EXPLOSIVES CO
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 263 Income/ Sales Tax collected from customers

Income-Sales Tax collected from customers--Liability regarding part of amount disputed before sales tax authorities and assessee treating that part as a deposit/Amount treated as deposit was part of t liability and was a trading Read More...


2002 PTD 1285
242 ITR 107
Lahore High Court 2002 IMPORIENT CHEMICAL (PVT.) LTD through Chief Executive
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE II, LAHORE and another
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50, 50(5), 50(4) Advance income-tax/ full and final discharge

Filing of return---Scope---Person who is an importer and has no other source of income and has paid the tax under the provisions of S.50(5) of Read More...


2002 PTD 187
Karachi High Court 2002 Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 Constitutional petition/ alternate remedy not efficacious

Constitutional petition --- Failure to avail revisional remedy --- Effect --- Availability of revisional remedy is not fatal to Read More...


2002 PTD 679
Punjab and Haryana High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
HARYANA MINERALS LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 145, 256 Valuation of stock

Change in method of valuation of stock-Finding by Tribunal that change was bona fide and changed method was followed regularly in succeeding Read More...


2002 PTD 1291
242 ITR 704
Lahore High Court 2002 IMPORIENT CHEMICAL (PVT.) LTD through Chief Executive
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE II, LAHORE and another
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50, 50(5), 50(4) Presumptive tax regime

Deduction of tax at source---Opting for presumptive tax regime---Filing of irrevocable declaration---Effect---Filing of such declaration opting Read More...


2002 PTD 187
Karachi High Court 2002 Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 Discretion-Administrative decision

Discretion-Administrative Read More...


2002 PTD 679
Karnataka High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
JANMABHOOMI PRESS TRUST
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 11 Charitable trust/ Borrowed funds

Charitable trust--Exemption/Borrowed funds utilised in construction of building which would augment income of trust/Repayment of debt amounted to application of income for charitable purposes--Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.11.
Held: Read More...


2002 PTD 1293
242 ITR 709
Karachi High Court 2002 Saiyed Saeed Ashhad and Abdul Ghani Shaikh, JJ
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65(1)(a)(b) Re-opening of assessment / Definite information

Re-opening of Read More...


2002 PTD 191
Karachi High Court 2002 Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 Interim relief

Appellate Authority--Power to grant interim relief Authority having power to grant final relief has the ancillary or incidental power to Read More...


2002 PTD 679
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SESHASAYEE INDUSTRIES LTD. (and vice versa)
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 10(6) (7), 40(c) 8c 40A(5)(b), Business expenditure / Exemption Director

Business expenditure--Ceiling on expenditure Exemption Director of company a foreign technician entitled to exemption under S.10(6)(viia)---Amount exempt under S. 10(6)(viia) is not to be taken into account for fixing ceiling under Read More...


2002 PTD 1295
= 242 ITR 691
Lahore High Court 2002 Messrs BE BE JAN PAKISTAN (PRIVATE) LIMITED, FAISALABAD
VS
THE I.A.C. Or INCOME TAX OF COMPANIES RANGE VI, FAISALABAD and 3 others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65 Re-opening of assessment/ Show-cause notice

Re-opening of assessment on the basis of second show-cause notice on another aspect of assessment---Validity---Earlier is a show-cause notice was Read More...


2002 PTD 208
Karachi High Court 2002 Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 Petition/ Maintainability

Petition---Maintainability-Where impugned action is completely without jurisdiction or illegal and no immediate departmental remedy is Read More...


2002 PTD 679
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SESHASAYEE INDUSTRIES LTD. (and vice versa)
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 10(6) (7), 40(c) 8c 40A(5)(b), Business expenditure/ Surtax

Business expenditure---Company-Surtax paid by assessee not to be deducted while computing total income under Income-tax Act--Indian Companies (Profits) Surtax Read More...


2002 PTD 1295
= 242 ITR 691
Lahore High Court 2002 Messrs H.I. (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE
VS
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136 Question of fact

Appeal to High Court---Question of fact---Question as to whether assessee purchased an open plot or some construction was also raised thereupon Read More...


2002 PTD 212
Karachi High Court 2002 Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 Interlocutory relief / Re-opening the case

Constitutional petition--Re-opening of assessment---Interlocutory relief-Where petitioner has Challenged the very notice of re-opening the Read More...


2002 PTD 679
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SESHASAYEE INDUSTRIES LTD. (and vice versa)
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 10(6) (7), 40(c) 8c 40A(5)(b), determination of damages/ Not an accrued liability

Business expenditure/Assessee entering into contracts for supply of insulators to Electricity Boards Provision for reduction in contract price by 1/2 per cent per week of contract value if assessee failed in due performance of contract Read More...


2002 PTD 1295
= 242 ITR 691
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Zaki Ahmad, D.R.
VS
NEMO
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 22 , 72 Income from other sources/ Interest income

Interest income---No business income---Business expenses---Set-off against interest income---No notice for discontinuation of business---First Read More...


2002 PTD 214
Karachi High Court 2002 Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 Presumptive tax regime/assessment

Distinction- History, Read More...


2002 PTD 679
Gujarat High Court (India) 2002 B AND A PLANTATIONS AND INDUSTRIES LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 Capital or Revenue expenditure/Interest

Capital or Revenue expenditure General principles---Expenditure on interior decoration of newly-constructed premises obtained on lease Revenue expenditure-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More...


2002 PTD 1301
242 ITR 22
Karachi High Court 2002 Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 Presumptive tax regime

Application of presumptive to regime of S. 80-C, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979--Powers of Assessing Officer-Categories to which presumptive tax Read More...


2002 PTD 679
Gujarat High Court (India) 2002 B AND A PLANTATIONS AND INDUSTRIES LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 certified copies of order/cannot exclude the time

Appeal to Appellate Tribunal/Limitation/Effect of Explanation to R.9 of Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 Income-tax Department furnished with copy of order of CIT-Time taken to obtain certified copies of order could not be Read More...


2002 PTD 1301
242 ITR 22
Karachi High Court 2002 Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 Stay of recovery proceedings

Petitioner's appeal pending before Commissioner-Assessing Officer took coercive actions by freezing Bank accounts under S.92 of the Ordinance Read More...


2002 PTD 679
Gujarat High Court (India) 2002 B AND A PLANTATIONS AND INDUSTRIES LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 capital or Revenue expenditure

The general principles applicable in determining whether a particular expenditure is capital or Revenue expenditure are as follows: (1) Read More...


2002 PTD 1301
242 ITR 22
Karachi High Court 2002 Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 Interim relief

Interim relief is necessitated, where immediate urgent disposal of cases may not be possible and the delay would be detrimental to the Read More...


2002 PTD 679
Gujarat High Court (India) 2002 B AND A PLANTATIONS AND INDUSTRIES LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 capital or Revenue expenditure

The general principles applicable in determining whether a particular expenditure is capital or Revenue expenditure are as follows: (1) Read More...


2002 PTD 1301
242 ITR 22
Karachi High Court 2002 Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 Bar of suit

Bar contained in S.162 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 would not apply where recoveries were in pursuance of order which were with Read More...


2002 PTD 679
Gujarat High Court (India) 2002 B AND A PLANTATIONS AND INDUSTRIES LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37

Income/Interest/Loan given interest-free to sister concern--No Interest due or collected Notional amount could not be assessed on ground that interest ought to have been charged-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961.
The assessee had advanced Read More...


2002 PTD 1301
242 ITR 22
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
MATRISEVA TRUST
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 11 Charitable trust /Donation to another charitable

Charitable purposes-Charitable trust-Exemption-Donation by assessee-trust to another charitable trust would amount to application of income for charitable purposes-Entitled to exemption-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.11.
-Charitable Read More...


2002 PTD 1308
82 TAX 621
242 ITR 20
Calcutta High Court (India) 2002 TIRUPATI TRADING CO
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) Disallowance of expenditure/ Amounts paid in cash

Amounts paid in cash in excess of specified limit---Amount paid in cash for disbursement among Lorry drivers---Payments reflected in account books---Amounts could not be disallowed---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.40A(3)---Indian Income Read More...


2002 PTD 1310
83 TAX 68
242 ITR 13
Calcutta High Court (India) 2002 TIRUPATI TRADING CO
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) Interest on borrowed capital

Interest on borrowed capital No evidence that amounts had been borrowed for purposes of business Interest was not deductible Indian Income Read More...


2002 PTD 1310
83 TAX 68
242 ITR 13
Calcutta High Court (India) 2002 TIRUPATI TRADING CO
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) Travel expenses

Business expenditure---Travel expenses---No finding on question whether travel was for purposes of business---Matter remanded---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37.
The assessee had also claimed deduction of Rs.1,08,381 as travel Read More...


2002 PTD 1310
83 TAX 68
242 ITR 13
Calcutta High Court (India) 2002 TIRUPATI TRADING CO
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) Transport expenditure

Case-1:The assessee-firm carried on the business of manufacturing, trading and export of cast iron. The assessee claimed deduction of payment of Rs.1,49,902 on transport. During the scrutiny, the Income- tax Officer found that out of Read More...


2002 PTD 1310
83 TAX 68
242 ITR 13
Calcutta High Court (India) 2002 TIRUPATI TRADING CO
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) Loan free of interest to sister concern

The assessee had claimed deduction of interest on a loan of Rs.8,60,000. The loan had been advanced immediately to a sister concern free of interest. The case of the assessee was that it was not in fact an interest free loan to P but an Read More...


2002 PTD 1310
83 TAX 68
242 ITR 13
Calcutta High Court (India) 2002 TIRUPATI TRADING CO
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) tours for the purpose of the business

That no details were furnished before the Income-tax Officer as to whom the partners of the firm had contacted abroad for the purpose of Read More...


2002 PTD 1310
83 TAX 68
242 ITR 13
Punjab and Haryana High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
ESCORTS EMPLOYEES ANCILLARIES LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 32 Depreciation/ Actual cost

Depreciation allowable on cost of acquisition of technical know-how---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32. Depreciation under section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is to be allowed on the total cost of the asset. The total cost shall Read More...


2002 PTD 1317
83 TAX 199
242 ITR 74
Madras High Court (India) 2002 Indian Income Tax Act, 1961
VS
37, 45, 48, 49 & 50
KALI AERATED WATER WORKS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Capital gains/ Computation of

Machinery obtained on dissolution of firm contributed as capital in new firm---Sale taken into account in calculating its cost--Sections 49 & 50 were not machinery---Depreciation allowed on machinery to old firm could not be applicable---Value as shown in books Read More...


2002 PTD 1319
83 TAX 83
242 ITR 79
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SOUTHERN PRESSINGS (PVT.) LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 Capital or Revenue expenditure/Royalty

Capital or revenue expenditure-Royalty-Five-year agreement for provisions of technical know-how for manufacture of air-cleaners-- Royalty paid per air-cleaner manufactured---Not a payment for acquisition of capital asset---Deductible as Read More...


2002 PTD 1324
242 ITR 2002
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SOUTHERN PRESSINGS (PVT.) LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 Capital gains/ Business income /Sale shares

Capital gains-Business---Business income or capital gains-Sale shares--Shares held by share broker as personal assets and included wealth tax return---Gains assessable as capital gains-Assessee  to relief under S.54F-Indian Income Read More...


2002 PTD 1324
242 ITR 2002
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SIVAM & CO
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32A Depreciation Borewell Rigs

Depreciation Special depreciation---Borewell---Rigs compressors mounted on a lorry and used for drilling borewell---Not and entitled to special depreciation at 30 per cent.---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S. Read More...


2002 PTD 1332
2002 SLD 213
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SIVAM & CO
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32A Investment allowance

Investment allowance---Borewell-Rigs and compressors used for drilling borewell---Not entitled to investment allowance---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32A.
Held, (i) that the assessee was not entitled to depreciation at the special rate of 30 per cent, in Read More...


2002 PTD 1332
2002 SLD 213
Gujarat High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
EMTICI ENGINEERING LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 37, 80 Capital or Revenue expenditure/ Donation to cricket club

Donation to cricket club---Tribunal right in holding that contribution to cricket club cannot be treated as capital in nature and directing Assessing Officer to allow it as Revenue expenditure---No question of law arose---Indian Income Read More...


2002 PTD 1336
242 ITR 86
83 TAX 212
Delhi High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
NIHAL CHAND REKYAN
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 263, 271 Penalty proceedings

Revision-Commissioner-Scope powers Penalty- Commissioner directing Income-tax Officer to initiate penalty proceedings--Penalty proceedings are not part of assessment proceedings-Tribunal right in quashing direction given by Read More...


2002 PTD 1339
82 TAX 620
242 ITR 45
Kerala High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
A. SREENIVASA PAI
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 139, 271 Concealment of income Penalty

Return Concealment of income...Scope of Expln. 1 to S. 271(1)(c) inserted with effect from 1-4-1976-Presumption of concealment where assessee offers explanation in respect of credit which Assessing Officer considers to be false Revised Read More...


2002 PTD 1341
83 TAX 222
242 ITR 29
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
K.P.V. SHAIK MOHAMED ROWTHER & COL (P.) LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 (1) Expenditure above prescribed limit

Disallowance of expenditure above prescribed limit-Travelling expenses of employee or, "any other person"- Meaning of "any other person" in R.6D(2)--Any other person would include a Director or Managing Director---Travelling expenses of Director or Managing Director Read More...


2002 PTD 1351
242 ITR 245
Madras High Court (India) 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
K.P.V. SHAIK MOHAMED ROWTHER & COL (P.) LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 (1) Commission paid to employees

Shipping agent Finding that employees canvassed for orders for their employer Extent of allowance of commission paid would depend on the facts of relevant previous year.
Sub-rule (2) of rule 6D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, places a Read More...


2002 PTD 1351
242 ITR 245
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
GULZAR UL HAQ
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 69, 69(4) Super Tax

Assessment of firms and partners---Share of super tax allowable to a partner was to be in the same proportion as his share in total Read More...


2002 PTD 226
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
GULZAR UL HAQ
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 69, 69(4) Super Tax

Assessment of firms and partners---Share of super tax allowable to a partner was to be in the same proportion as his share in total Read More...


2002 PTD 226
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Zaki Ahmad, D.R.
VS
NEMO
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 22 , 72 Additional assessment/ Revised returns

Notice under S.61 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Contention was that assumption of jurisdiction by issuing notice under S.61 of the Income Read More...


2002 PTD 214
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Zaki Ahmad, D.R.
VS
NEMO
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 22 , 72 Deemed income/ Gold brought into Pakistan

Deemed income---Gold brought into Pakistan---Personal effects---Nothing was brought on record to establish that gold brought into Pakistan was Read More...


2002 PTD 214
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Zaki Ahmad, D.R.
VS
NEMO
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 22 , 72 World income/ Exemption

---“World income”---Exemption---Tax payer is required to declare total world income and in case income-tax had been paid abroad, Read More...


2002 PTD 214
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Muhammad Younas Ghazi, F.C.A.
VS
Muhammad Asif, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 108, 55 Failure to furnish return | Penalty

Failure to furnish return of total income---Penalty---Penalty imposed under S.108 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 for the late filing of return Read More...


2002 PTD 237
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Mirza Muhammad Waheed Baig
VS
NEMO
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 110,30, 22 ,24, 88 Lease income/ Industrial / undertaking

Lease income---Industrial undertaking---Exemption---Lease income was not part of the profits and against derived from an industrial undertaking Read More...


2002 PTD 244
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Mirza Muhammad Waheed Baig
VS
NEMO
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 110,30, 22 ,24, 88 Property

Inadmissible deduction---Add back---Deletion of---Deletion of machinery repairs add back was upheld by the Tribunal as the same had been done in Read More...


2002 PTD 244
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Mirza Muhammad Waheed Baig
VS
NEMO
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 110,30, 22 ,24, 88 Additional tax/ Show-cause notice

Additional tax---Show-cause notice---Speaking order---Necessity---Additional tax cancelled by the First Appellate Authority was restored by the Read More...


2002 PTD 244
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Mirza Muhammad Waheed Baig
VS
NEMO
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 110,30, 22 ,24, 88 Penalty for non-compliance

Penalty for non-compliance with notice, etc.---Cancellation of penalty, levied under S.110 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, by the First Read More...


2002 PTD 244
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Muhammad Umer Farooq, D.R.
VS
NEMO
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 23, 23(1)(vii), 30 Borrowed capital/ Interest income/Interest payable

Deduction---Borrowed capital---Interest income---Interest payable---Deduction whether admissible---Department taxed the amount of interest income Read More...


2002 PTD 250
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2002 Naeem Akhtar Sh., F.C.A.
VS
Mian Javed-ur-Rehman, D.R.
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(16)(ii), 17B Bank loan/ asset/project / Partly sold out

Bank loan was obtained against an asset/project---Entire project was not offered for taxation having been partly sold out---Entire liabilities Read More...


2002 PTD 252
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Asif Ali Khan, A.C.M.A. and Muhammad Irshad, I.T.P.
VS
Muhammad Umer Farooq, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 23, 66-A Business expenditure

Powers of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner’s order---Deduction---Payment made to secure the market free Read More...


2002 PTD 257
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Yousaf Ali, I.T.P. .
VS
nemo
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66,66-A, 80-D,156, 62 Travel agent / Commission/ Gross receipts

Assessee, a travel agent---Commission---Gross receipts---Sale of assets---Inspecting Additional Commissioner directed the Assessing Officer to Read More...


2002 PTD 260
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002
VS
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66,66-A, 80-D,156, 62 Assessment, after the revision

Assessment, after the revision, was rectified under S.156 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 by the Assessing Officer---Validity---Since original Read More...


2002 PTD 260
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002
VS
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 59, 66-A,59,59(4) Self-assessment/ Last declared/ Assessed

Income last declared or assessed whichever is higher---Words “last declared or assessed” as used in Self-Assessment Read More...


2002 PTD 267
Lahore High Court 2002 NYLEX (PRIVATE) LTD.
VS
D.C., INCOME TAX
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136,136(1),14,24 (c) Commission / Discount

Gross profit rate---History of the case---Re-casting of account---Application of gross profit rate following the history of the case after Read More...


2002 PTD 275
Lahore High Court 2002 NYLEX (PRIVATE) LTD.
VS
D.C., INCOME TAX
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136,136(1),14,24 (c) Issue raised out of First Appellate Authority’s order

---R. Read More...


2002 PTD 275
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002
VS
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66, 66-A, Order passed IAC

C.B.R. Circular C.No.2(1) DATA-2 of 1994, dated 19-2-1994---Powers of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioners’ Read More...


2002 PTD 278
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002
VS
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), Objection raised in Audit Report

Power of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner’s order---Objection raised in Audit Report---Proceedings based on Read More...


2002 PTD 283
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002
VS
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), concept of change of opinion

Order of the Inspecting Additional Commissioner could not be hit by the concept of change of opinion on the part of Assessing Officer as he, Read More...


2002 PTD 283
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002
VS
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), Change of opinion

Change of opinion---Initiation of proceedings under S.156 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 by the Assessing Officer and subsequently under Read More...


2002 PTD 283
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX/WEALTH TAX, LAHORE ZONE-B, LAHORE
VS
MESSRS NOOR TRADING COMPANY, PATTOKI
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Ss. 59, 61, 65 & 136(1) Self-Assessment Scheme/Re-opening of case/ immunity

Central Board of Revenue Circular No.9, dated 1-7-1993, para. 1(i) ---Appeal---Self-Assessment Scheme---Re-opening of case---Assessment under Self-Assessment Scheme was not accepted by the Income-tax Authorities and notice under S.61 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More...


2002 PTD 1560
87 TAX 102
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002
VS
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), Change of opinion

Inspecting Additional Commissioner’s direction to Assessing Officer to issue notice under S.116 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More...


2002 PTD 283
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Muhammad Nasim
VS
NEMO
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), Setting off of loss incorrectly

Order prejudicial to the interest of Revenue---Setting off of loss incorrectly---If it was found that the loss was incorrectly set off against Read More...


2002 PTD 283
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Muhammad Nasim
VS
Nemo
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), Capital gain | Stock in trade

Capital gain---Stock in trade---Income From---Head of income-Words “held by an assessee” as used in the context of capital assets Read More...


2002 PTD 283
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX/WEALTH TAX, LAHORE ZONE-B, LAHORE
VS
MESSRS NOOR TRADING COMPANY, PATTOKI
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 59, 61. 65 & 136(1) Self-Assessment Scheme/Object and scope/ Immunity clause

Self-Assessment Scheme---Object and scope---Immunity clause in any fiscal statute or a similar concession in the rules framed thereunder, is an expression of helplessness on the part of the Revenue to tap the pilferage---Once the helplessness is so declared in the Read More...


2002 PTD 1560
87 TAX 102
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Khalik Waggan, A.C.A. and Irfan Saadat
VS
Shaheen Aziz Niazi, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 24,24(b), 50(7D) Words and Phrases

----“Any”----Meanings----Word “any” has a diversity of meaning as may be employed to indicate “all” or Read More...


2002 PTD 303
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Khalik Waggan, A.C.A. and Irfan Saadat
VS
Shaheen Aziz Niazi, D.R
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 24,24(b), 50(7D) Inadmissible deduction

Inadmissible deduction-----Expression “instrument of any Kind” used in S.50(7D) of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More...


2002 PTD 303
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2002 Muhammad Umer Farooq, D.R.
VS
Nemo
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) R. 8(5) Sale proceeds Addition

Sale proceeds Addition---Addition was made on the ground that sale consideration was shown lesser than the fair market value of the assets Read More...


2002 PTD 309
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2002 Akbar G. Merchant and Ms. Yasmin Ajani, F.C.As
VS
Muhammad Umer Farooq, D.R.
Wealth Tax Act, 1963. section 17-B Circular/instructions

Circulars instructions by Central Board of Revenue of beneficial nature, are binding on the field Read More...


2002 PTD 316
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2002 Akbar G. Merchant and Ms. Yasmin Ajani, F.C.As.
VS
Muhammad Umer Farooq, D.R.
Wealth Tax Act, 1963. section 17-B Remittances | Normal banking channel

Second Sched. , Part I, Cl. 7(ii) Exemption Remittances not proved through normal banking channel Sale of Foreign Exchange Bearer Bonds No Read More...


2002 PTD 316
Lahore High Court 2002 Messrs MEHTAB INDUSTRIES LIMITED, SAHIWAL through Chief Executive
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, CIRCLE 16, COMPANIES ZONE I, LAHORE and 3 others
Finance Act, 1991 12,234 Constitutional jurisdiction/ Appellate jurisdiction

Art. 199 Constitutional jurisdiction Scope Distinct from Appellate jurisdiction Fact alone that after the order of Tribunal, assessee has no Read More...


2002 PTD 324
Lahore High Court 2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, COMPANIES ZONE III, LAHORE
VS
Messrs MARGALA TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136 Appeal to High Court

Appeal to High Court Question in the nature of argument pre-supposing a finding of fact was refused to be entertained for consideration Read More...


2002 PTD 327
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
SRINIVASA HATCHERIES (P.) LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32, 256 Income Trust

Reference Depreciation Plant Building Poultry sheds whether plant entitled to a higher rate of depreciation Question of law Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.32 & 256.

Held, that the question Read More...


2001 PTD 1416
Kerala High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
ABAD HOTELS INDIA (P.) LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 32A Hotel business/ Kitchen, store-room and equipment

Investment allowance/ Hotel business/ Kitchen, store-room and equipment used for producing foodstuffs/ Not entitled to investment allowance as there is no production of food materials in a hotel/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32A.

Hotel business is not an Read More...


2001 PTD 1764
[(2000)82 TAX 98]
Supreme Court of India 2001 WHIRLPOOL OF INDIA LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 43, 43B, 142 Income Trust

Business expenditure Tax, duty, cess or fee Deduction only on actual payment Proviso to S. 43B clarifying that sums paid after accounting year but before due date for submission of return would be deductible Supreme Court decision in Read More...


2001 PTD 1417
Kerala High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
VAIKUNDAM RUBBER CO. LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.57 Deduction/ Interest from fixed deposits

Other sources/ Deduction/ Interest from fixed deposits/ Borrowals for agricultural purposes/ Interest paid on borrowals/ Not a charge on interest income from fixed deposits/ Not deductible/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.57.

The assessee derived interest Read More...


2001 PTD 1770
[(2000)82 TAX 112]
[241 I T R 50]
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
DURGA ENGINEERING AND FOUNDRY WORKS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 254, 254(1), 254(2), 256 Income Trust

Reference Scope of S.256 Questions which can be referred to High Court All orders passed by Tribunal under S.254 Order of rectification passed under S. 254(2) Reference lies from such order to High Court Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. Read More...


2001 PTD 1420
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 ANZ GRINDLAYS BANK PLC
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 214, 220 & 246 Levy of interest/ Interest payable by Government

Appeal to Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/  Recovery of tax/  Competency of appeal/ Levy of interest under S.220(2)/  No appeal lies against such levy/  Levy of interest by Assessing Officer while giving effect to order of Tribunal/  No Read More...


2001 PTD 1773
[241 ITR 269]
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
FRANCO TOSI INGEGNERIA
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 Business expenditure/ Commencement of business

Business expenditure/ Commencement of business/  Assesse, a non-resident-Company/ Securing letter of intent for project in India on 13-4-1981/  Thereafter, setting up site office on 1-10-1981/  Business commenced on 13-4-1981/ Expenditure from that Read More...


2001 PTD 1782
[241 ITR 268]
Supreme Court of India 2001 BHARAT EARTH MOVERS
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 Income Trust

Business expenditure General principles Difference between accrued and contingent liabilities Amount set apart to meet liability on account of leave encashment of employees Not a contingent liability Amount is deductible Indian Income Read More...


2001 PTD 1427
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
FIRST LEASING CO. OF INDIA LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 147(b) Reassessment/ Information that income had escaped assessment

Reassessment/  Information that income had escaped assessment/ Extra depreciation allowed/ Revenue audit drawing attention to relevant provision/ reopening of assessment on basis of audit report—Report of audit constituted “information”/ Read More...


2001 PTD 1784
[241 ITR 248]
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
ANAND THEATRES AND OTHERS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32, 32(1)(v), 43, 43(3) Dictionary meanings

Dictionary meanings, however, helpful in understanding general sense of the words cannot control where the scheme of the statute or the instrument considered as a whole clearly conveys a somewhat different shade of meaning. Words have to Read More...


2001 PTD 1288
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
FIRST LEASING CO. OF INDIA LTD
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.16, 30 & 31 Salary income/ Income from other sources

Salary income/ Determination/ Condition precedent to the classification of the income under S.16 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was that the payer and the payee had the relationship of the “employer” and the “employee”.

Ss.16, 30 Read More...


2001 PTD 1794
[(2001)83 TAX 214]
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 Salman Pasha
VS
Zaki Ahmed
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) Ss.17-B, 16(3) & 2(5)(ii) Valuation/ Unfinished four storeys of commercial building

Powers of Inspecting Assistant Commissioner to revise Wealth Tax Officer”s order/ Unfinished four storeys of commercial building/ Portions of ground floor and first floor of said building were let out and were competed by the assesses out of the amount of Read More...


2001 PTD 1809
83 TAX 219
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
FIRST LEASING CO. OF INDIA LTD
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) S.50(3-A) Deduction of tax at source/ Convention for avoidance of double taxation

Deduction of tax at source/ Convention for avoidance of double taxation/ Exemption/ Assesse claimed exemption, from deduction of tax from payment to non-resident on account of technical services, under double tax treaty/ Validity/ Exemption under double tax treaty Read More...


2001 PTD 1816
(2001)83 TAX 248
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
FIRST LEASING CO. OF INDIA LTD
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) Second Sched., Part I, Cl. 77-A, Ss.2(29), 50 & 52 Exemption/ Interest/ Liability of person failing to deduct or pay tax

Exemption/ Interest/ Liability of person failing to deduct or pay tax/ Deduction of tax at source-Fee for technical services-Tax under S.52 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was levied as the assesse had not made deductions on payments in respect of technical Read More...


2001 PTD 1816
(2001)83 TAX 248
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2001 FECTO BELARUS TRACTORS LIMITED
VS
PAKISTAN through Ministry of Finance Economic Affairs and another
Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Art.188/ Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O.XXVI, R.1 Review of Supreme Court judgment

Review of Supreme Court judgment/ Rearguing the appeal at review stage/ Validity/  Distinction existed between review and rehearing and attempt to reargue the appeal at review stage was not permissible:
Review of Supreme Court Judgment-Exercise of power by Read More...


2001 PTD 1829
84 TAX 25
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2001 null
VS
null
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.136 Right of appeal/ Not an inherent right

Right of appeal/ right of appeal which was available at the time of commencement of a “lis” could not be taken away except by express language. 

Right of appeal/ Not an inherent right/  Right of appeal is not an inherent right but it Read More...


2001 PTD 1848
(2001)83 TAX 206
Patna High Court (India) 2001 JANARDAN DAS
VS
BINDESHWARI PRASAD SAH and another
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 132-A. Search and seizure

---Search and seizure---Search and seizure under Bihar Money Lenders’ Act---Requisition of seized assets---Scope of power under under S.132-A---Power under S.132-A---Power under S. 132-A has to be exercised immediately after property is seized by police Read More...


2001 PTD 26
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 BRITIANNIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and others
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 45 & 147 Capital gains

---Reassessment---Capital gains---Amount of capital gains shown in return and accepted by Assessing Officer---Subsequent report by Valuation Officer that fair market Read More...


2001 PTD 31
Allahabad High Court (India) 2001 DAVENDRA PAL SINGH
VS
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX AND ANOTHER
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.2(e) Agricultural land

Exemption/ Agricultural land/ Agreement in May, 1989 to sell to developer land which had groves on it/ Purchaser authorized to cut trees/ Application for approval for development of land submitted in June, 1989 and amount paid to development authority in September, Read More...


2001 PTD 1860
Madras High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SAROJA RAMAN and antother
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.164. S.164. Trustee

---Representative assesse---Trustee—Maximum marginal rate of tax--- Condition precedent---Beneficiaries or shares of beneficiaries should be indeterminate or unknown---Discretion to trustees regarding time and extent of disbursal of income to beneficiaries is Read More...


2001 PTD 38
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
K. VIJAYAKUMAR
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Part I of Schedule I Land and building used for business

Additional wealth tax/ Exemption/ Land and building used for business/ Meaning of "business"/ Agricultural activity amounts to business/ Assessee carrying on agriculture and ginning factory/ Entitled to exemption from additional wealth tax/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, Read More...


2001 PTD 1877
Gauhati High Court (India) 2001 DIRECTOR OF STATE LOTTERIES
VS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and others
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.2(24)(ix) & 28. lottery tickets

Income---Lottery--Agent in lottery tickets---Meaning of "lottery"--- Lottery implies a right to participate in draw---Agent in lottery tickets does not have right to participate in draw-Income accruing to agent in respect of prizes on Read More...


2001 PTD 43
Supreme Court of India 2001 INCOME TAX OFFICER
VS
SARADBHAI M. LAKHANI AND ANOTHER
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.147(b) Reassessment

Reassessment/ Information that income has escaped assessment/ -Decision of High Court would constitute information- Initiation of. Reassessment proceedings on basis of such decision is valid/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.147 (b).

Held, Read More...


2001 PTD 1879
83 TAX 160
Madras High Court 2001 SREE PALANIAPPA TRANSPORTS
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
India Income Tax Act, 1961, S.254(2) depreciation

Rectification---Mistake apparent from the record---Powers of Appellate Tribunal---Tribunal deciding debatable issue---No decision of jurisdictional High Court on those issues---Judgment rendered by jurisdictional High Court subsequent to decision of Tribunal on such Read More...


2001 PTD 77
Supreme Court of India 2001 NEW INDIA MINING CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 Expenditure should have been actually incurred/ mining leases

Business expenditure/ Condition precedent for deduction--Expenditure should have been actually incurred/ Assessee holding mining leases from State Government/ No expenditure towards restoration of lands to their original condition incurred by assessee/ Question Read More...


2001 PTD 1881
84 TAX 418
Madras High Court 2001 SREE PALANIAPPA TRANSPORTS
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
India Income Tax Act, 1961, S.254 (2) Depreciation

The assessee, a registered firm, claimed set off of unabsorbed depreciation of the earlier years. There were conflicting decisions of the various High Courts on the point and the Tribunal chose to follow the decision of the Allahabad Read More...


2001 PTD 77
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
M.C. SATYAVATHI
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 4(1)(a)(iv). Assessee gifting monies to trust

Assessee”s husband creating trust for would be son-in-law/ Assessee gifting monies to trust/ Gift absolute and not revocable/ Gifted amounts not includible in computation of net wealth of assessee--Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.4(1)(a)(iv).

The Read More...


2001 PTD 1885
Madras High Court (India) 2001 NORTH ARCOT DISTRICT COOPERATIVE SUPPLY AND MARKETING SOCIETY LTD.
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
India Income Tax Act, 1961, S.254(2) Deficiency in stock

---Business income---Deduction---Deficiency in stock---Loss not allowable as deduction. In the assessment year 1971-72 relevant for the accounting year ending June 30, 1970, the Income-tax Officer disallowed deduction claimed by the Read More...


2001 PTD 81
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
M.C. SATYAVATHI
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 61 Inclusions in total income

Total income/  Inclusions in total income/ Contributions made by assessee to trust created by her husband/ Contributions considered by High Court as gift with no power of revocation/ Interest attributable to contributions made by assessee not includible in Read More...


2001 PTD 1885
Madras High Court (India) 2001
VS
In re: MOOLAMATTOM ELECTRICITY BOARD EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. and others
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.2 & 194A. Cooperative society

---Deduction of tax at source---Cooperative society---Exemption from liability to deduct tax at source---Scope of subsection (3) of S. 194A--- Cooperative society is entitled to exemption---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.2 & Read More...


2001 PTD 84
Gujarat High Court (India) 2001 PRABHAVATI B. SOLANKI
VS
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss. 16 & 17A Limitation/ Meaning of assessment

Assessment/ Limitation/ Meaning of assessment/ Assessment includes determination of net wealth as well as computation of tax payable/ No finding on question whether computation of tax had been made before time limit/ Matter remanded/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Ss. Read More...


2001 PTD 1887
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
S.VIJI
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.2 & 194A. Salary

Salary---Standard deduction---Vehicle provided by employer for official personal use---Full standard deduction cannot be claimed---Indian come Tax Act, 1961, S.16 (i).

For the assessment year 1977-78, Read More...


2001 PTD 89
Madras High Court (India) 2001 T. RAGHURAMAN
VS
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 5(1)(viiia) Exemption/ Growing crops

Exemption/ Growing crops/ Entire coffee and tea bushes apart from two leaves and bud of tea bush and berries of coffee bush do not fall within expression "growing crops" for exemption under S.5(1)(viiia) of Act/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Read More...


2001 PTD 1891
Kerala High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
P. GANGADHARAN
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.6(1)(b). Residence

Non-resident---Test of residence---Maintenance of dwelling house india for 182 days in relevant previous year---Assessee, member of HUF, which owned a house in India---Though assessee might have a share in house, no evidence to indicate Read More...


2001 PTD 97
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX/ WEALTH TAX
VS
BABULAL KHINCHAND TRUST
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 21A, 11(1)(a) Charitable trust

Exemption/ Charitable trust/ Trust deed providing that if settlor left no wife or children, trust property should be applied. For such charitable purposes as may be decided upon by trustees--Deed had specifically provided for application of property for charitable Read More...


2001 PTD 1893
Madras High Court (India) 2001 K.SOMASUNDARAM & BROTHERS
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S .36(1)(iii) Interest on borrowed

Business expenditure---Interest on borrowed capital---Condition precedent for deduction---Capital must be used in business---Borrowed capital invested in executing contracts---From contract receipts, sums advanced interest free to Read More...


2001 PTD 101
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
N. KAMATCHI AMMAL
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 5(1A) Exemption/ Firm/ Partner/ Assets eligible for exemption owned by firm

Exemption/ Firm/ Partner/ Assets eligible for exemption owned by firm/ Partner entitled to exemption in respect of her share in firm/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.5(1A). 

The principles relating to exemption which can be claimed by a partner of a firm Read More...


2001 PTD 1895
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
AMALGAMATIONS LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.22 & 263. Property on rent

---Revision---House property---Annual value---Property given on rent--- Annual value determined by Assessing Officer on the basis of actual rent in respect of one property and higher rent in respect of another party---No material too Read More...


2001 PTD 108
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
A.V. REDDY, TRUST B. V. HARISH REDDY AND OTHERS
Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 R. 1D Valuation of unquoted equity shares of company

Valuation of assets/ Valuation of unquoted equity shares of company/ If in provision for taxation advance tax paid is shown as liability it is not to be treated as liability/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957/ Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957, R. 1D.

If in the case Read More...


2001 PTD 1899
Madras High Court (India) 2001 V. RAMANUJAM
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income-tax Rules, 1962, Rr.40 & 117A Advance tax

Return---Advance tax---Interest---Waiver of interest---Application for waiver---Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard---Rejection of application without giving such an opportunity---Matter remanded---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More...


2001 PTD 113
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
A.V. REDDY, TRUST B. V. HARISH REDDY AND OTHERS
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.21 Beneficiary entitled to corpus of trust property

Trust/ Assessment/ Beneficiary entitled to corpus of trust property after attaining age of twenty-five years/ Beneficiary not attaining age of twenty-five years/ Interest of beneficiary in trust property alone is includible in net wealth of beneficiary/ Indian Read More...


2001 PTD 1899
243 ITR 195
Patna High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
HINDUSTAN MALLEABLE AND FIRGINGS LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(8), 215 & 246. Interest

---Appeal---Interest---Appeal Not maintainable against levy of interest---Liability to interest may be challenged in appeal against assessment---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(8), 215 & 246.
Against levy of interest in Read More...


2001 PTD 118
Jammu & Kashmir High Court India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
JAWAHAR LAL MEHRA
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.16 Assessment/ Procedure/ Computation of net wealth

Assessment/ Procedure/ Computation of net wealth and tax payable need not be done in same sheet of paper/ Sum payable calculated on a separate sheet of paper which was signed by Assessing Officer on same date on which order computing net wealth was signed by him/ Read More...


2001 PTD 1904
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
MEAT OF INDIA LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(8), 215 & 246. Subsidy

---Capital or revenue expenditure---Subsidy---Tests---Purpose of subsidy set up or complete a new project---Subsidy is capital receipt---Subsidy received to run business operations successfully after commencement of production---Subsidy Read More...


2001 PTD 127
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
MADURA DEVAKOTTAI TRANSPORTS (P.) LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 139(8), 215 & 246. loan

----Hundi loan---Additions made as transactions were not effected through account-payee cheque---Tribunal holding that they were not Hundis though written on Hundi papers---Additions deleted---Justified---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More...


2001 PTD 129
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
A.M.M.AR. LAKSHMI ACHI
Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 R. 1D Valuation of unquoted equity shares

Valuation of unquoted equity shares/ Balance-sheet/ Sales tax penalty not shown. as a liability in balance-sheet/ Company succeeding in its challenge to imposition of penalty under Sales Tax Act/ Sales tax penalty not deductible as a liability. Indian Wealth Tax Read More...


2001 PTD 1909
246 ITR 468
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 Smt. KAUSHALYABAI
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(8), 215 & 246. Death of assessee

 --Reassessment---Death of assessee---Notice---Notice issued in the name of a person who was dead---Widow of such person participating in reassessment proceedings---Defect in notice stood automatically cured---Indian Income Tax Act, Read More...


2001 PTD 141
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
GUJARAT POLYCRETE (PVT.) LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.43B & 256 Business expenditure/ Deduction only on actual payment

Business expenditure/ Deduction only on actual payment/ Sales tax/ CBDT issuing circular stating that if a State Government had amended its Sales Tax Act to provide that sales tax deferred under an incentive scheme would. be treated as actually paid it would satisfy Read More...


2001 PTD 1912
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 GOUTAM ROY
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax 1961, Ss.132 & 226. Recovery of tax

---Recovery of tax---Garnishee proceedings---Attachment of rent of buil belonging to assessee---Assessment of income on the basis of search---Ar against assessment pending---No application for stay of demand or rece proceedings---Recovery proceedings were Read More...


2001 PTD 143
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER.OF WEALTH TAX
VS
D.R. VADERA
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 17 Re-assessment/ Effect of reopening of

Reassessment/ Effect of reopening of reassessment/ Previous order of underassessment is set aside and Assessing Officer has jurisdiction and duty to levy tax on entire wealth that has escaped assessment/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S. 17.

Once an assessment Read More...


2001 PTD 1914
246 IT R 348
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 GOUTAM ROY
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax 1961, Ss.132 & 226. Recovery of tax

---Recovery of tax---Garnishee proceedings---Attachment of rent of buil belonging to assessee---Assessment of income on the basis of search---Ar against assessment pending---No application for stay of demand or rece proceedings---Recovery proceedings were Read More...


2001 PTD 143
Allahabad High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WRALTH TAX
VS
ANIL KUMAR AGGARWAL
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 5 Exemption/ House

Wealth tax/ Exemption/ House/ Co-owner of house is entitled to exemption in respect of his share/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Read More...


2001 PTD 1917
246 ITR 93
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
BALARAMPUR CHINI MILLS LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, 139(8), 215 & 246. Capital Assets Capital Receipts

----Capital or revenue receipt---Sugar manufacture---Expansion of plant to avail of additional free sale quota---Stipulation that surplus funds resulting to be used only to repay loans taken from financial institutions---Loans taken for Read More...


2001 PTD 149
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 Dr. MRUNALINIDEVI
VS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX AND OTHERS
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 17 Petition against notice without availing of remedies

Reassessment/ Writ-Notice of reassessment/ Notice not illegal per se- Writ petition against notice Read More...


2001 PTD 1919
246 ITR 90
Allahabad High Court (India) 2001 COMMISIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
MALIK CONSTRUCTION CO.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, 256, 256(1) Award by arbitrator

---Capital or revenue receipt---Assessee, a contractor---Award by arbitrator of additional sums to assessee for additional work done---Interest awarded on such sums for periods prior to award and thereafter up to date of payment is revenue Read More...


2001 PTD 154
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 Dr. MRUNALINIDEVI
VS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX AND OTHERS
Constitution of India Art. 226 Petition/ Existence of alternate remedy

Existence of alternate remedy/ Writ will not normally issue/ Constitution of India, Art. 226. 

The jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is couched in wide terms and the existence thereof is not subject to any Read More...


2001 PTD 1919
246 ITR 90
Gujarat High Court (India) 2001 BHARATIBEN JAYANTIBHAI THAKKAR
VS
TAX RECOVERY OFFICER
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961. null Attachment of property

---Recovery of tax---Attachment and sale of property---Property in name of wife of partner of defaulter-firm---Wife objecting to attachment on ground property in question acquired out of her own resources---Recovery Officer bound to Read More...


2001 PTD 160
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 ONKARJIT SINGH KANWAR
VS
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 R. 1D Valuation of unquoted shares

Valuation of assets/ Valuation of unquoted shares/ Rule 1D has to be applied -Wealth Tax Act, 1957/ Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957, R. 1D. The provisions of rule 1D of the Wealth Tax Rules, 1957, are mandatory and the valuation of unquoted shares should be made in Read More...


2001 PTD 1922
246 ITR 104
Gujarat High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
BIPIN VADILAL
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 147 Failure to disclose material facts

Reassessment---limitation---Failure to disclose material facts---
Assessment reopened on basis of law declared by Court---Not a case of failure to disclose material facts—Reassessment could be only under S.147(b)---Barred by Read More...


2001 PTD 197
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 ONKARJIT SINGH KANWAR
VS
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 2(m)(ii) Debts incurred in relation to properties

Net Wealth/ Deductions/ Debt/ Debts incurred in relation to properties which are exempt from wealth tax/ Not deductible/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Section 2(m)(ii) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, on a bare reading shows that deduction is not to be permitted where it Read More...


2001 PTD 1922
246 ITR 104
Patna High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
BIPIN VADILAL
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.5(2)(b). Non-resident

---Non-resident---Income deemed to accrue or arise in India---Collaboration agreement--- Lump sum payment made under agreement by Indian company American company for transfer of know-how---Did not accrue or arise in India---Indian Income Read More...


2001 PTD 205
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
V.R.M. VALLIAPPA CHETTIAR
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 25(2) Valuation of assets

Valuation of assets/ Valuation made for earlier valuation date could not ipso facto be applied for valuation for later years. The valuation for wealth tax purposes is required to be made as on the valuation date and a report given with regard to the value made for Read More...


2001 PTD 1926
246 ITR 801
Patna High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER INCOME- TAX
VS
DHAWAN INVESTMENT AND TRADING CO. LTD.
Income Tax Act, 1961 28 Premises taken on rent

----Business expenditure---Premises taken on rent---Agreement for payment Of advance to be adjusted against rent---Finding by Tribunal that premises had been used for business purposes---Rent paid was deductible---Indian Income Tax Act, Read More...


2001 PTD 219
Madras High Court (India) 2001 THIRUMAGAL MILLS LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 27 Motor cars and trucks used for business purposes

Reference/ Company/ Assets/ Motor cars and trucks used for business purposes/ Tribunal correct in holding that motor cars were includible in “net wealth” / -No question of law arose/ Finance Act, 1983, S.40(3)(vii)/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Read More...


2001 PTD 1928
246 ITR 800
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 KESHAB NARAYAN BANERJEE
VS
COMMISSION OF INCOME-TAX and another
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.148 & 282. service of notice

----Writ---Appeal---Procedure--- contained in O. 41,R 22 of  Civil Procedure Code would apply---No appeal or cross-objection by respondent--- Respondent cannot raise issue at the time of appeal---Question regarding service of notice Read More...


2001 PTD 233
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
Mrs. KUKU NARANG
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 27 Penalty/ Concealment of wealth

Penalty/ Reference/ Concealment of wealth/ Finding by Tribunal that there had been clerical errors and no concealment of wealth/ Finding of fact/ No question of law arose from it/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.27.

Held, that the Read More...


2001 PTD 1929
246 ITR 198
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 HOPE (INDIA) LTD. (NOW PODDAR UDYOG LTD.)
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.5, 22 & 23. Accrual of income

-Income---Accrual of income—House property---Assessment maintaining accounts on mercantile system---Tenants agreeing to pay enhanced rent with retrospective effect---No accrual in year of account---Enhanced rent agreed to after Read More...


2001 PTD 248
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
R. ARIFF AND OTHERS
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss.5(1)(iv) & 27 Exemption/ Firm/ Partner/ Building owned by firm

Reference/ Exemption/ Firm/ Partner/ Building owned by firm/  Commercial building also regarded as a house for purpose of S.5(1)(iv)/ Tribunal correct in holding that partner was entitled to exemption in respect of his share in firm in respect of property owned Read More...


2001 PTD 1932
246 ITR 797
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 JUBILEE INVESTMENTS AND INDUSTRIES LTD.
VS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and other
income Tax Act, 1961, S.221. Tax Deduction at source (TDS)

----Deduction of tax at source---Delay in depositing TDS----Penalty----Levy of penalty justified though TDS deposited before ley of penalty---Liable to pay interest as well as penalty---Loss in business of assesses nothing to do with Read More...


2001 PTD 263
Madras High Court (India) 2001 BHAGWANDAS JAIN AND 3 OTHERS
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX AND ANOTHER
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.17 Reassessment notices/ Report of Valuation Officer

Reassessment/ Assessment for assessment years 1979-80 to 1981-82 obtaining finality in 1984/ Reassessment notices issued in 1988 on basis of a report of Valuation Officer/ Report of Valuation Officer not called for during pendency of assessment but after completion Read More...


2001 PTD 1934
246 ITR 632
Gujarat High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SUPER SCIENTIFIC CLOCK CO.
income Tax Act, 1961, S.221. Business expenditure

--Business expenditure--- Payment to foreign collaborator--- Mercantile system of accounting---Liability accrues and is deductible in year in which sum payable--- Not year in which assesse actually pays--- Procedure for obtaining Read More...


2001 PTD 273
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
Smt. SOMA WANTI SETHI
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss. 27, 13 & 8 Voluntary disclosure of wealth

Voluntary disclosure of wealth/ Reference/ Assessee a partner in a firm/ Voluntary disclosure of income by firm/ Additions to net wealth of assessee on account of disclosure by firm/ Effect of non-compliance with S.13(2) read with S.8(1) of Voluntary Disclosure of Read More...


2001 PTD 1940
246 ITR 683
Gujarat High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SUPER SCIENTIFIC CLOCK CO.
income Tax Act, 1961 S.221 Payment to foreign collaborator

--Business expenditure--- Payment to foreign collaborator--- Mercantile system of accounting---Liability accrues and is deductible in year in which sum payable--- Not year in which assesse actually pays--- Procedure for obtaining Read More...


2001 PTD 273
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
Mrs. R.B. PATEL
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss. 5(1)(viii) & 35 Rectification of mistake

Rectification of mistake/ Exemption/ Jewellery/ Wealth tax assessment completed excluding value of jewellery as falling under exemption/ Retrospective amendment to S.5(1)(viii) by Finance (No.2) Act, 1971, making jewellary liable to wealth tax/ Wealth Tax Officer Read More...


2001 PTD 1944
246 ITR 341
Kerala High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
JOSEPH RAJAPPAN AND OTHERS
Income tax Act, 1961. Ss. 139 & 148. Carry forward and set off

--Loss---Carry forward and set off--- Return of loss filed pursuant to notice under S. 148 within time limit prescribed under S. 139(4)---Will be deemed to have been filed under S.139---Assesse entitled to carry forward Read More...


2001 PTD 278
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
KALAWATI
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 2 & 256 Agricultural income/ Capital gains

Reference/ Agricultural income/ Capital gains/ Profits from sale of agricultural lands/ Law applicable/ Effect of Explanation to S.2(1-A) with retrospective effect from 1-4-1970/ Whether income arising from transfer of agricultural lands can be treated as Read More...


2001 PTD 1946
246 ITR 465
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
YAMUNA DIGITAL ELECTRONICS (P.) LTD.
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.35. Scientific research

---Scientific research---No requirement that expenditure should be wholly and exclusively for research and development---Proportionate deduction on basis of part use of plant and machinery for research-Permissible---Indian Income Tax Read More...


2001 PTD 282
Supreme Court of India 2001 VISHIN N! KHANCHANDANI AND ANOTHER
VS
VIDYA LACHMANDAS KHANCHANDANI AND ANOTHER
Indian Government Savings Certificate Act, 1959 Ss. 6, 7 & 8 National savings certificate/ Nomination

National savings certificate/ Nomination/ Effect/ Upon death of holder, nominee entitled to receive sum under certificate without proof of title/ But retains such sum for benefit of persons entitled under law of succession/ Indian Government Savings Certificate Act, Read More...


2001 PTD 1949
(2002)85 TAX 137
246 ITR 306
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 JJ I.T.C. LTD. and another
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and others
Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 142 Single Judge order

----Assessment--Audit-Writ---Writ petition against order under S.142(2A) Order staying assessment proceedings and observing the payment of auditor”s fees would be considered at final hearing of writ petition---Order was Read More...


2001 PTD 286
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
SMT. SHAKUNTLA MEHRA & 2 OTHERS
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss.7 & 25 Valuation of assets

Valuation of assets/ Revision/ Powers of Commissioner/ Valuation of properties on the basis of average of cost of construction and rent capitalization method/ Order erroneous and prejudicial to interests of Revenue/ Commissioner adopting valuation on rental income Read More...


2001 PTD 1959
246 ITR 501
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 INDIAN TRADE PROMOTION ORGANISATION
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.256. Law well settled

--Reference-Law on point well-settled---Reference not to be called for--- Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.256. 

When the law is clear and well-settled on a particular point, there can be no Read More...


2001 PTD 289
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
HARRISON CROSSFIELD (INDIA) LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 2(18) Company in which public are substantially interested

Company in which public are substantially interested/ Definition/ Assess company formed to take over Indian business of widely held foreign company/ Foreign company to hold 40 percent, shareholding in assessee-company/ Scheme of amalgamation completed by High Court Read More...


2001 PTD 1963
246 ITR 88
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 INDIAN TRADE PROMOTION ORGANISATION
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.256. Expenses to

Reference-Export. markets development allowance-Weighted deduction---Whether expenditure was wholly and exclusively for particular purpose or partly so-Question of fact---No question arises for reference--- Expenditure must be shown to Read More...


2001 PTD 289
Jammu & Kashmir High Court India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
ABDUL GANI BHAT
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.16 Computation of net wealth and tax payable

Assessment/ Procedure/ Computation of net wealth and tax payable need not be done in same sheet of paper/ Sum payable calculated on a separate sheet of paper which was signed by Assessing Officer on same date on which order computing net wealth was singed by him/ Read More...


2001 PTD 1965
246 ITR 607
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 CASHMER WOOLLEN AND SILK MILLS
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.256. Business income

----Income---Business income---law applicable---Effect of introduction of cl.(iiia) in S.28 amendment of cl.(24) of  S.2 with retrospective effect form 1-4-1962 by Finance Act, 1990---Premium earned on sale of  import Read More...


2001 PTD 293
Allahabad High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
ANIL KUMAR
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(3), 5(1)(iv) Net wealth/ Firm/ Partners--Addition

Net wealth/ Firm/ Partners--Addition in case of firm found by Tribunal to be intangible and not represented by assets/ Share of additions not includible in net wealth of partner/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957.

Held, that under the Wealth Read More...


2001 PTD 1968
246 ITR 38
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 K. PACIRSAMY NADAR
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.256(2). lottery ticket

----Income from lottery---Encashment of lottery ticket by illegal exchange---Assessed as income form other sources---Question as framed did not arise for consideration--- Indian Income Tax Act, 1961,S.256(2).
Read More...


2001 PTD 295
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
ANOKHA SINGH
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.25 Assessment order completed without inquiry

Revision/ Powers of CWT/ Assessment order completed without inquiry/ Order is erroneous and prejudicial to revenue/ CWT can revise such an order/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.25.

Where the assessment is completed without any enquiry whatsoever the order of Read More...


2001 PTD 1970
246 ITR 26
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
TRACTORS AND FARM EQUIPMENT LIMITED
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 demonstration farm

Business expenditure---Assessee engaged in manufacture of farm equipment----Maintaining 200 acres demonstration farm to train salesmen and dealers-Farm expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively fr business--Deductible---Though incurred Read More...


2001 PTD 298
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL CORPORATION MARKETING FEDERATION LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 80 Cooperative society/ Special deduction-

Cooperative society/ Special deduction/ Law applicable/ Amendment of S.80-P(2)(a)(iii) with retrospective effect/ Order passed by High Court in reference subsequent to amendment not taking note of amendment/ Writ petition challenging validity of amendment/ Direction Read More...


2001 PTD 1974
246 ITR 486
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
TRACTORS AND FARM EQUIPMENT LIMITED
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 Business expenditure

Business expenditure---Assessee engaged in manufacture of farm equipment----Maintaining 200 acres demonstration farm to train salesmen and dealers-Farm expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively fr business--Deductible---Though incurred Read More...


2001 PTD 298
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
Mrs. VIDYA MALHOTRA
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 18(1)(c) Concealment of wealth/ Declaration of value of property

Penalty/ Concealment of wealth/ Declaration of value of property on basis of valuation report of approved value/ Difference in estimate of valuation between approved valuer and departmental valuer/ Assessee”s valuation bona fide/ No deliberate understatement/ Read More...


2001 PTD 1975
246 ITR 524
Kerala High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
STEEL COMPLEX LTD.
Capital or revenue expenditure

---Capital or revenue expenditure---Assessee engaged in manufacture of steel---Incurring expenditure on installation of water treatment plant and fume extraction plant---Resulted in improvement in operation of existing systems with Read More...


2001 PTD 310
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
Mrs. VIDYA MALHOTRA
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 27 Questions of law and fact

Reference/ Questions of law and fact/ Difference/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.27. Where the Read More...


2001 PTD 1975
246 ITR 524
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
NAVBHARAT ENTERPRISES (P.) LTD.
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37. Business expenditure

----Business expenditure---Interest on agricultural loans---Assessee engaged in processing and export of tobacco---Interest allowable only on amount spent for raising tobacco, “not other crops---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More...


2001 PTD 319
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 MUHAMMAD HANIF, D.R
VS
IJAZ ALI BHATTI, ADVOCATE /A.R
Wealth Tax Rules, 1963 R. 8(3) Valuation of lands and buildings

Valuation of lands and buildings/ Rented property, valuation of/ Value of rented out property was adopted higher than the Gross Annual Letting Value by the Department on the plea that property could fetch more rent than the one declared/ Validity/ Appellate Tribunal Read More...


2001 PTD 1981
246 ITR 524
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
NAVBHARAT ENTERPRISES (P.) LTD.
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 Interest on agricultural loans

---Business expenditure---Interest on agricultural loans---Assessee engaged in processing and export of tobacco---Interest allowable only on amount spent for raising tobacco, “not other crops---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37.

The assessee-company Read More...


2001 PTD 319
Lahore High Court 2001 C. I. T., CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE
VS
MESSRS ITTEFAQ TEXTILE MILLS LTD., LAHORE
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 S. 4(1) Claim interest expense/ overdraft/ loan

Assessee, in the year 1976-77 ran a textile mill and claimed interest expense of Rs.1,30,5,259 on account of overdraft/ loan availed by the company/ Assessing Officer noted that the assessee had advanced a sum of Rs.33,79,391 to a subsidiary company on which no Read More...


2001 PTD 2119
Madras High Court (India) 2001 METAL POWDER CO. LTD.
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.40(c). Business expenditure

---- Business expenditure---Amounts not deductible---Company---Commission paid to director---Disallowance---Commission paid is also remuneration---Is subject to ceiling limit prescribed under sub-cl. (i) of cl. (c) of S.40 of Income-tax Read More...


2001 PTD 322
Madras High Court (India) 2001 SUNDARAM INDUSTRIES LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 40(c) Business expenditure/ Company/ Ceiling on expenditure

Business expenditure/ Company/ Ceiling on expenditure/ Assets used by director of personal purposes/ Burden of proving that assets were not used for personal purposes of directors in on company/ No proof that motor car was not used for personal purposes of director/ Read More...


2001 PTD 2121
239 ITR 405
Gujarat High Court (India) 2001 AVANI CORPORATION
VS
INCOME-TAX OFFICER
Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 147. Reassessment

-Reassessment---Limitation---Failure to disclose, material facts---Facts recorded as reasons to reopen assessment recorded and considered in assessment order--No failure to disclose material facts---Reassessment after four years not Read More...


2001 PTD 325
Bombay High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
JAYPEE DYEING HOUSE
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 32 Depreciation/ Rate of depreciation

Depreciation/ Rate of depreciation/ Higher rate in case of manufacture/ Assessee dyeing, printing and bleaching artificial silk cloth/ Assess was not engaged in manufacture/ Not entitled to higher rate of depreciation/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32/ Indian Read More...


2001 PTD 2134
239 ITR 418
Bombay High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
AMRITABN R. SHAH
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.80HHC & 256. Purchase of shares

---Income from other sources---Deduction---Condition precedent for allowance ---Expenditure must be with primary motive of earning income---Purchase of shares with view to acquiring controlling interest in company---Object was not to Read More...


2001 P T D 334
Kerala High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF IMCOME-TAX
VS
TRAVANCORE CEMENTS LTD.
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37(3A) Repairs expenses

----Business expenditure---Disallowance---Repairs---Whether motor car expenses and repairs to car would fall under S.37(3A) for computing disallowance---Contrary views taken by Division Benches of High Court in CIT v. Navodaya (1997) 225 Read More...


2001 PTD 338
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
GNANAMMBIGAL MILLS
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.37 & 40A(7). Gratuity

---Business expenditure---Gratuity---Insurance premium paid to L.I.C. under group gratuity scheme—Not deductible under S.37 of Indian Income Tax Act, 1961---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.37 & 40A(7).
    For the Read More...


2001 PTD 340
Kerala High Court (India) 2001 HOTEL SHAH & CO.
VS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and another.
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(2) & 142(1). Return filing

---Best judgment assessment---Failure to file return within due date---Failure to respond to notices under Ss. 139(2) & 142 (1)--- Assesse submitting that it could not file return due to search and seizure--- Not acceptable as search Read More...


2001 PTD 342
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 CLOUTH GUMMIWERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and another
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(2) & 142(1). Income deemed to accrue

Non-resident---Income---Income deemed to accrue or arise in India--- fees for technical services fees paid to foreign company for services of engineers for supervising erection of project---taxable--- Air fare of engineers paid by Read More...


2001 PTD 364
Bombay High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
RADIO TALKIES
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.48. Capital gains

----Capital gains---Computation of---Closure of business of assessee and sale of land and building---Payment of retrenchment compensation to ex- employees---Not expenditure wholly and exclusively for purpose of transaction of Read More...


2001 PTD 376
Kerala High Court (India) 2001 G. GANAGADHARN NAIR
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.80HHC & 256. Export earnings premium

----Reference---Tribunal recording finding without considering evidence--- Question referred cannot be answered--Matter has to be remanded---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961,Ss.80HHC & 256.

2001 P T D 330
Kerala High Court (India) 2001 HOTEL SHAH & CO.
VS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and another.
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(2) & 142(1). Return filing

---Best judgment assessment---Failure to file return within due date---Failure to respond to notices under Ss. 139(2) & 142 (1)--- Assesse submitting that it could not file return due to search and seizure--- Not acceptable as search and seizure was long after Read More...


2001 PTD 342
Gujarat High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
D.K. TRADING CO.
Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 256. evading tax

---Reference---Firm---Registration---Whether or not firm genuine and whether or not formed as device to evade tax---Finding of fact---No question of law arises---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 256.
      
Where Read More...


2001 PTD 380
Lahore High Court 2001 Messrs NARRY SONS, LAHORE (Messrs BARRY BROTHERS, LAHORE)
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE A, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Administration of justice

----Adverse order---Before adverse order is passed against any party such party should be afforded full opportunity to meet the case and rebut evidence used against Read More...


2001 PTD 406
Lahore High Court 2001 Messrs NARRY SONS, LAHORE (Messrs BARRY BROTHERS, LAHORE)
VS
COMMISfSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE A, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 cash sales

---S.32---Rejection of accounts---Unverifiable portion of cash sales--- Rejection of such sales by Assessing Officer---Previous as well as in subsequent years the declared results of the assessee had been accepted--- Contention of the Read More...


2001 PTD 406
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
TODI TEA CO. LTD.
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 Business expenditure

---Business expenditure---Assessee, a tea company---Contract for supply of tea by assessee---Breach of contract by assessee---Payment of sum by assessee under settlement entered into between parties---Assessee following mercantile system Read More...


2001 PTD 435
Lahore High Court 2001 Messrs. NIDA-I-MILLAT (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE I, LAHORE
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 Gratuify

----Allowable expenses---Gratuities payable to employees---Admissibility as expense against income of relevant years---Such amount is a proper charge on the income of the assessee and as such is admissible as an expense.

Read More...


2001 PTD 443
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
HINDUSTAN TELEPRINTERS LTD.
income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 10(28) & 280ZB Surtax

Reassessment Information Company- Surtax- Computation of capital-Audit party bringing to notice of Assessing Officer failure to apply R.4-is not opinion as to law--Reassessment on basis thereof permissible---Indian Companies (Profits) Read More...


2001 PTD 445
Lahore High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, LAHORE
VS
Messrs. NAWA-E-WAQT PUBLICATIONS LTD., LAHORE
Income-tax Act, 1922 Income from property

 ----Ss.9, 10 & 66(1)---Income from property---Rejection of claim of assessee without cogent reasons---Assessing Officer treated the declared income from property under S.9 of Income-tax Act, 1922, and rejected the claim of the Read More...


2001 PTD 455
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SIMPSON & CO. LTD.
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37. Capital, or revenue expenditure

----Capital, or revenue expenditure---Expenditure to obtain technical know- how--General principles---Amount paid under collaboration agreement for acquiring technical know-how relating to manufacture of automobile engine---Technical Read More...


2001 PTD 480
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
D.ENGINEERING (PVT.) LTD.
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 212(3A) & 217(1A). Advance Tax

---Advance Tax---Estimate filed---Failure to pay advance tax as per estimate filed---Interest cannot be levied---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 212(3A) & 217(1A).

Although the obligation cast on Read More...


2001 PTD 487
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
THANTHI TRUST
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.11. Charitable trust

---Charitable purpose---Charitable trust---Exemption---Credit entries in accounts of trust in favour educational institutions---Corresponding withdrawals by educational institution---Amounts to application of income---Trust entitled to Read More...


2001 PTD 491
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SRI RAMALINGA CHOODAMBIGAI MILLS LTD.
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.28, Expln. 2 & 43(5) (a). Damages paid for cancellation of contracts

---Business expenditure--- Damages paid for cancellation of contracts for purchase of cotton as assessee decided to produce yarn of higher count---Hedging contracts and not speculative transaction---Deductible as revenue Read More...


2001 PTD 495
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SHREE SHEW SHAKTI MILLS (PVT.) LTD.
Income Tax Act, 1961. Rental Income

---Business Income---Rental Income---Superstructure on leasehold land let out to parties for limited period---Is income from business---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961.

Whether the plot of land was Read More...


2001 PTD 498
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SHREE SHEW SHAKTI MILLS (PVT.) LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 maintenance of flat used for business

---Business expenditure---Expenditure on maintenance of flat used for business purpose---Is allowable expenditure---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37

Maintenance allowance and depreciation allowance Read More...


2001 PTD 498
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 LUCAS TVS LTD
VS
COMMISIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 35B Ceiling on expenditure

---Business expenditure---Ceiling on expenditure---Company---Director who is also an employee and a foreign technician entitled to exemption under S.10(6) (viia)---Amount exempt under S.10(6)(viia) is not to be taken into account for fixing ceiling under Ss.40(c) Read More...


2001 PTD 502
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SHREE SHEW SHAKTI MILLS (PVT.) LTD.
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32. Depreciation

---Depreciation---Flat used for business purpose---Flat standing in name of director and not assessee-Company---Facts not properly enquired into---Matter remanded---Depreciation not to be allowed if assessee fails to prove ownership of flat---Indian Income Tax Act, Read More...


2001 PTD 498
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
SHREE SHEW SHAKTI MILLS (PVT.) LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 maintenance of flat used for business

---Business expenditure---Expenditure on maintenance of flat used for business purpose---Is allowable expenditure---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37

Maintenance allowance and depreciation allowance Read More...


2001 PTD 498
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 null
VS
null
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 59, 59-A(2) & 59(3), 59A Adjustment

---Ss. 59-A(2) & 59(3)---C.B.R. Circular No.18 of 1980, dated 28th July, 1980---Addition---Powers of Assessing Officer to make addition---Scope---Assessing Officer was not empowered to make an addition of undisclosed income to the Read More...


2001 PTD 1043
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 A & M AGENCIES
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX and others
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 194A, 201 & 231. Payment of interest

---Recovery of tax---Limitation---Deduction of tax at source---Payment of interest without deducting tax at source---ITO failing to treat assessee as an assessee in default by an order under S.201--- Initiation of proceedings for Read More...


2001 PTD 505
Madras High Court (India) 2001 TAMILNADU DAIRY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.32. ownership

----Depreciation---"Owner", meaning of---Person who receives income from asset in his own right entitled to allowance---Legal ownership not condition in such a case---Refusal to grant depreciation solely for failure to produce registered Read More...


2001 PTD 508
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
LUCAS INDIAN SERVICE LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 Remuneration

---Business expenditure---Remuneration to employees---General Principles---Pension paid to (widow of director--- Resolution passed while director was working for assessee-company authorising payment of pension to director and after his Read More...


2001 PTD 514
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
V. RAMAKRISHNA SONS LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 104, 155(7) Additional tax

----Rectification of mistakes---Company---Additional tax on undistributed profits---Rectification under S. 155(7) of order passed under S.104---I.A.C.”s approval not required---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.104 & 155(7).

The approval of the Read More...


2001 P T D 520
Bombay High Court (India) 2001 INDUSTRIAL CONSULTING BUREAU (P.) LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 144B Municipal taxes

----Deduction---Draft assessment order---Revised return---Deduction claimed in revised return after passing of draft assessment order---Cannot be entertained---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 144B.
The Tribunal was not right in Read More...


2001 PTD 524
Gujarat High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
VIKRAM PLASTICS AND OTHERS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.145 & 256(2) books of account

Reference---Accounting---Finding that books of account had been maintained regularly and that no defects had been found in accounts--- Tribunal justified in holding that accounts could not be rejected under S.145---No question of law Read More...


2001 PTD 526
Gujarat High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
VIKRAM PLASTICS AND OTHERS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.256(2) Income from undisclosed sources

---Reference-Income from undisclosed sources---Finding that explanation regarding consumption of raw materials was satisfactory---Tribunal justified in deleting addition to income---No question of law arose---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More...


2001 PTD 526
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
PREMIER MILLS LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.3 & 32 Depreciation

---Previous year---Depreciation---Change in previous year---Power of Assessing Officer to impose conditions for such change---Assessing Officer cannot curtail statutory deduction admissible for such period---Assessing Officer agreeing to Read More...


2001 PTD 530
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 40A(7) Gratuity

----Business expenditure---Gratuity amount relating to pre-nationalisation period---Debited to approved gratuity reserve---Gratuity paid to employees during year under assessment---Is allowable deduction---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More...


2001 PTD 535
Kerala High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
KERALA TRANSPORT COMPANY
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 Business expenditure

----Business expenditure---Assessee carrying on transport business---Liability in respect of loss of goods---Liability under Carriers Act, 1865, is a. statutory liability--Provisions made in respect of such liability in accounts Read More...


2001 PTD 539
Gujarat High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
ARVIND H. SHAH
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.256(2) Promissory note

----Reference---Promissory note found during a search of residential premises of assessee---Additions made in income of assessee during assessment year 1987-88 deleted by CIT (Appeals) on the ground that additions had already been made Read More...


2001 PTD 545
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
REGIONAL SOYABEAN PRODUCTS COOPERATIVE UNION LIMITED
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 220, 220(2A), 143(2), 143(1), 143 Procedure for assessment

----Assessment---Procedure for assessment---Notice issued under S. 143(2)--- Assessing Officer cannot issue intimation under S.143(1)(a) thereafter--- Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.143.
A reading of sections 143(1)(a) and 143(2) Read More...


2001 PTD 548
Lahore High Court 2001 Mst. FARIDA BIBI
VS
I.T.O., CIRCLE 14, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S. 136 Obligation of the High Court

Reference to High Court/ Scope/ Obligation of the High Court to decide the questions of law referred to it was contingent upon the hearing of the case/ Hearing of the case could not be made unless the party at whose instance the questions had been referred to the Read More...


2001 PTD 2137
84 TAX 186
239 ITR 418
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
M.K. RAJU CONSULTANTS (P.) LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 80, 80AB, 80B(5), 80-O Special deduction

----Special deduction---Income by way of fees for work done outside India--- Deduction of such fees from gross total income---Fees received from abroad constituted assessee”s gross receipt-Income from fees is to be computed in Read More...


2001 PTD 556
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
Miss SRIPRIYA MAHESH
Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 1D Valuation of shares

Valuation of shares---Tax liability of company upheld by High Court---Tax liability to be deducted for purpose of determining break-up value of the share of company---Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957, R.1-D.

The assessee was a shareholder in a company, S, which Read More...


2001 PTD 1624
Madras High Court (India) 2001 SUNDARAM CLAYTON LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 40(c)(ii) Reimbursement of medical expense

Business expenditure/ Disallowance/ Company/ Reimbursement of medical expense and cash payment like house rent allowance paid to managing director are part of salary/perquisite for purpose of disallowance under S.40(c)(ii)/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More...


2001 PTD 2139
2391 ITR 416
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
ENGINEERS INDIA LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 Capital or revenue expenditure

----Capital or revenue expenditure---Amount paid initially for acquiring membership of organisation entitling assessee to receive latest technical information---Membership to be renewed annually---Assessee did not acquire asset of Read More...


2001 PTD 560
Rajasthan High Court India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
Smt. GULAB DEVI
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(3) Firm

Reference---Valuation of assets—Firm---Valuation of closing stock given in balance-sheet---Burden on Revenue to prove that valuation was not correct and that market value exceeded it by more than twenty per cent.----Burden of Proof not discharged by Read More...


2001 PTD 1629
Madras High Court (India) 2001 SUNDARAM CLAYTON LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 40A(5). Cash payments like house rent allowance

Business expenditure/ Disallowance/ Cash payments like house rent allowance paid to employees/ Is to be treated as salary for determining ceiling under S.40A(5)/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.40A(5).

The Tribunal was correct in holding that the cash payment Read More...


2001 PTD 2139
2391 ITR 416
Kerala High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
ENGLISH INDIAN CLAYS LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 209A Advance tax

----Advance tax---Liability to pay advance tax---Obligation to file estimate-- Law applicable---Effect of S.209A inserted w.e.f. 1-6-1978---Order passed by Tribunal without considering effect of S.209A---Matter remanded--- Indian Income Read More...


2001 PTD 564
Lahore High Court 2001 MESSRS HOME PLANNERS THROUGH MUHAMMAD AZEEM, PARTNER
VS
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, CIRCLE06, COYS, ZONEIII, LAHORE (NOW CIRCLE 14, COY ZONEII, LAHORE) AND 4 OTHERS.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 65(1), 65(2) Reassessment

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Reassessment----Requirements for issuing notice under S.65, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Principles---Where the requirement postulated in S.65, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 had not been met by the Read More...


2001 PTD 1633
Punjab and Haryana High Court (India) 2001 STATE BANK OF PATIALA
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.245 Refund/ Set-off of refund against sum payable

Refund/ Set-off of refund against sum payable under Income-tax Act/ Condition precedent/ Intimation mush be given to assessee prior to such set-off/ Indian Income Tax, Act, 1961 S.245.

The following conditions must exist or be fulfilled in order to set off a Read More...


2001 PTD 2145
239 ITR 421
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
SUDARSAN CHIT (INDIA) LTD. (NO. 1)
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 36(1)(v) Contribution to approved gratuity fund

----Business expenditure---Contribution to approved gratuity fund--- Conditions precedent---Condition that employee should have rendered service for five years or more---Employees of holding company taken over by assessee---Service of Read More...


2001 PTD 566
Lahore High Court 2001 USMAN SAEED BUTT
VS
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, INCOMETAX, CIRCLE2 COM, ZONEI, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 56, 58, 61 Opinion / Decision

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition----Issuance of notices under Ss.56, 58 & 61 of the Income Tax Ordinance in the names of a dead person---Fact that the person had died was within the knowledge of the Assessing Officer who instead Read More...


2001 PTD 1647
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
CHENNAI PROPERTIES AND INVESTMENT LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.37 & 201(1A) Business expenditure/ Investment/ Interest paid

Business expenditure/ Investment/ Interest paid under S.201 (1A) for failure to deduct tax at source and remit it to Central Government/ Interest is not deductible as business expenditure/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.37 & Read More...


2001 PTD 2156
239 ITR 435
Karachi High Court 2001 Messrs CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. (PVT.) LTD
VS
PAKISTAN and others Per Dr. Ghous Muhammad, J
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Interpretation of statutes

---Taxing statute---Words in a taxing statute including notifications and orders, unless ambiguous, must be given their ordinary and natural meaning--Subject is not to be taxed unless the statute clearly imposes the burden of tax, while Read More...


2001 PTD 570
Lahore High Court 2001 MESSRS ANSAR EXPORT ENTERPRISES LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. ZONE B, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136 Compensate

Income---Customs rebate was direct income of the assessee---Principles---Rebate, discount and commission---Connotation.

A rebate of tax when with reference to actual amounts earlier paid by a taxpayer is different from the one given with reference to the Read More...


2001 PTD 1649
Lahore High Court 2001 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, COMPANIES, LAHORE
VS
PUNJAB COOKING OIL LTD, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S. 13(1)(d) Deemed income/ Addition

Deemed income/ Addition/ Two separate and independent approvals of the I.A.C. for making additions to the declared income of the assessee were necessary at the relevant Read More...


2001 PTD 2161
Karachi High Court 2001 Messrs CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. (PVT.) LTD
VS
PAKISTAN and others Per Dr. Ghous Muhammad, J
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) Deduction of income-tax at source

S.52---Deduction of income-tax at source---Failure to deduct such income-tax---Effect---Assessee who fails to deduct income-tax at source is treated as "assessee in default"---Where payee/deductee pays his full tax, any shortfall in or Read More...


2001 PTD 570
Lahore High Court 2001 WELCON CHEMICALS
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 80, 50, 50(4), 50(5), 80C(4) Deduction

Deduction of tax at source----Assessee, deriving income from sale of pesticides---Income-tax was paid by the assesse under S.50(5) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 at the time of import---Department had asked the assessee to pay the income-tax as a supplier under Read More...


2001 PTD 1656
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 INCOME TAX COMMISSIONER
VS
ANUPCHAND & CO.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 32 Depreciation/ Rate of allowance

Depreciation/ Rate of allowance/ Higher rate applicable in case of business of hiring/ Assessee using trucks for own business and claiming depreciation on trucks at 40 percent/ 40 percent, applicable to vehicles used for hire business/ Assessee using trucks for own Read More...


2001 PTD 2162
239 ITR 466
Karachi High Court 2001 MESSRS KARACHI HOSPITAL LTD.
VS
COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, CENTRAL ZONE A (NOW COMPANIES(III), KCY.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.136 Expenditure not incidental to business

---S.136---Appeal to High Court---Maintainability---Where the decision rests on examination of the facts on record, the same would be a question of law as the question whether inference framed from give facts or not was a question of Read More...


2001 PTD 609
Madras High Court (India) 2001 CARBORANDUM UNIVERSAL LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 31, 40A(7), 40A(7)(b), 154 Surtax

Business expenditure---Company---Surtax---Surtax is levied on profits of a company---Surtax is not deductible---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37.

Business expenditure---Contribution to approved gratuity fund---Trust deed executed on 26-8-1970---Amendment of Read More...


2001 PTD 1661
Karachi High Court 2001 MESSRS KARACHI HOSPITAL LTD.
VS
COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, CENTRAL ZONE A (NOW COMPANIES(III), KCY.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.23(i)(xviii) Expenditure not incidental to business

---S.23(i)(xviii)---Deduction---Expenditure not incidental to business---Refusal to allow such expenditure as deductions under S.23 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Expenditure of salaries made by the assesse was not deducted by the Read More...


2001 PTD 609
Madras High Court (India) 2001 AURO FOOD LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX and another
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 220(2A). Waiver of interest

The three conditions for grant of waiver of interest under section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, are that (i) payment of such amount has caused or would cause genuine hardship to the assesse; (ii) default in the payment of the Read More...


2001 PTD 613
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
SESHASAYEE BROS. (PVT) LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 28 Accrual of income/ Time of accrual

Income/ Accrual of income/ Time of accrual/ Managing agency agreement providing for remuneration at a certain percentage and a minimum remuneration/ Additional remuneration payable if it exceeded minimum after audited balance-sheet and profit and loss account were Read More...


2001 PTD 2169
239 ITR 471
Karachi High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.55 & 57 Return

---Ss.55 & 57---Revised return---Failure to reflect/mention figure of capital gains in the relevant column of the return---Revised return whether to be treated as one under S.57 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Return was initially Read More...


2001 PTD 623
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
RAASI CEMENT LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 56 & 256 Income or capital/ Other sources

Reference/ Income or capital/ Other sources/ Tribunal justified in holding that interest earned on borrowed capital constituted capital receipts and that it was not assessable as income from other sources/ No question of law arose/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.56 Read More...


2001 PTD 2180
239 I T R 596
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Accrual of Income

---Income---According---Accrual of Income---Time of accrual---Collaboration agreement with non-resident company---Amount received by assesse-company under agreement---Resolution of Board of Directors before entering into agreement that Read More...


2001 PTD 628
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
JAYALAKSHMI MILLS (PVT) LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 40A Business expenditure/ Gratuity

Business expenditure/ Gratuity/ Conditions laid down in S.40A(7) must be fulfilled/ Remittance of amount less than that required statutorily/ -Assessee cannot claim lesser benefit not entitled to any deduction Income Tax Act.1961, S. 40A. 

Section Read More...


2001 PTD 2185
239 ITR 605
Karachi High Court 2001 Messrs NATIONAL BEVERAGES (PVT.) LTD
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.65 Definite information

---S.65---Definite information---Re-opening of assessment---Scope---Change of opinion of Income Tax Officer---Where assessee had disclosed all the material facts without concealment and the assessment had been consciously completed by Read More...


2001 PTD 633
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
A. C. MAHESH
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 45 Capital gains/ Firm/ Contribution of assets

Capital gains/ Firm/ Contribution of assets by partner constitutes transfer within the meaning of S.45/ Question whether capital gains arose when amount was credited in both capital account and current account of partner not considered by Tribunal/ Matter remanded/ Read More...


2001 PTD 2189
239 ITR 616
Madras High Court (India) 2001 CHENNAI MURASU (P.) LTD.
VS
CHENNAI MURASU (P.) LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.147(b) Reassessment Escapment of Income

---Reassessment---Information that income had escaped assessment Information can be gathered from material relating to subsequent assessment year---Assessee publishing newspaper---Calculation of wastage of newsprint found to be excessive Read More...


2001 PTD 650
Gujarat High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
BHAGWAT PRASAD P. PARIKH
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 80U Special deduction/ Permanent physical disability

Special deduction/ Permanent physical disability/ Whether assessee suffers from permanent physical disability and whether disability results in substantially reducing his capacity to engage in gainful employment or occupation/ Are questions of fact/ Quantum of Read More...


2001 PTD 2193
239 ITR 645
Karnataka High Court (India) 2001 CHAMUNDI GRANITES (P.) LTD
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 269-SS & 271-D Penalty/ Evasion of tax/ Mode of taking loans and deposits

Penalty/ Evasion of tax/ Mode of taking loans and deposits/ Constitutional validity of provisions/ Section 269-SS stipulating that loans and deposits exceeding prescribed limit should be taken only by way of crossed cheques or crossed Bank drafts/ Section 271-D Read More...


2001 PTD 2200
239 ITR 694
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 80P(2)(a)(i) Cooperative society/ Special deduction/ Interest on securities

Cooperative society/ Special deduction/ Interest on securities, subsidy from Government, interest from other cooperative institutions and Banks and dividends are entitled to special deduction under S.80P/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.80P(2)(a)(i).

Interest Read More...


2001 PTD 2208
239 ITR 700
Lahore High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE B, LAHORE
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE B, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) SS. 13 & 111 Unexplained investment

---SS. 13 & 111---Unexplained investment---Concealment of income-tax Penalty---Retrospective effect of S.111(2)(c) of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Income Tax Authorities imposed penalty on the assesse for having concealed the assets Read More...


2001 PTD 668
Karachi High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
VALIKA ART FABRICS LTD.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 19 & 22 Rental income

---S.19---Rental income---Premises/properties used for manufacturing process or business---Income derived by renting out such premises/properties---Such income to be treated as rental income---Failure to produce any material evidence to Read More...


2001 PTD 672
Kerala High Court (India) 2001 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICE
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 9 & 44-D Income deemed to accrue or arise in India

Income deemed to accrue or arise in India/ Non-resident/ Business connection/ Agreement with resident for rendering technical services/ Amount paid by resident to non-resident treated by assessing authority as royalty and technical fees taxable under S.9(1)(vii) Read More...


2001 PTD 2218
239 ITR 713
Karachi High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
Miss AASIA FILM ARTIST
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 46(1) penalty

---S.46(1)---Imposition of penalty---Principle of natural justice---Applicability---Show-cause notice, non-issuance of---Effect---Penalty was imposed on the assessee by the Income-tax Authorities under S.46(1) of Income-tax Act, 1922, Read More...


2001 PTD 678
Lahore High Court 2001 MESSRS SUTLEJ TEXTILE MILLS, LAHORE
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 S. 34 Assessee sold out his factory

Reference to High Court/ Assessee sold out his factory but remained in possession/ Sale was revoked after two years/ Assessee filed turn on notice under S.34 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 declaring loss and claimed that it was Custodian of Enemy Property who was Read More...


2001 PTD 2232
84 TAX 284
Karachi High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
Messrs FAYSAL ISLAMIC BANK OF BAHRAIN, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Importants

---Meaning of word/expression in a particular section of statute---Reporting to ordinary dictionary meaning---Scope---Courts in assigning/defining the meaning of a word/expression has to take into consideration the object or the purpose Read More...


2001 PTD 682
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
J. K. BERI
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 147 & 256(2) Reassessment

Reference/ Reassessment/ Tribunal quashing reassessment on legal grounds alone without considering facts/ Question of law arose/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.147 & 256(2).

Held, that since the Tribunal had stated that it had quashed the reassessment Read More...


2001 PTD 2246
248 ITR 5
Karachi High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
Messrs FAYSAL ISLAMIC BANK OF BAHRAIN, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.2(24) net income

---S.2(24)---Income as mentioned in S.2(24), Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Connotation---Expression “income” does not mean “net income” after making all permissible allowances, deduction, depreciations Read More...


2001 PTD 682
Lahore High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE A, LAHORE
VS
Messrs A. L, HAMIDI, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss. 5(1)(c) & 136 Jurisdiction of Income-tax Authorities

Jurisdiction of Income-tax Authorities/ Reference to High Court/ Assessment order had to be made by the Deputy Commissioner of the Income-tax while such privilege, in respect of certain classes of persons or cases, could very well be exercised by a person higher in Read More...


2001 PTD 2247
Karachi High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
Messrs FAYSAL ISLAMIC BANK OF BAHRAIN, KARACHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss. 23 & 136(1) Description on assets given on

---Ss. 23 & 136(1)---Depreciation on leased assets---Refusal to allow the depreciation form net income from lease rentals---Assessee being dissatisfied with the assessment filed appeal before Appellate Authority---Assessment framed Read More...


2001 PTD 682
Lahore High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE A, LAHORE
VS
Messrs A. L, HAMIDI, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss. 136 & 66-A(1) Authority equal in status

Reference to High Court/ Authority equal in status/ Power of revision/ Authority equal in status could Read More...


2001 PTD 2247
Madras High Court (India) 2001 THANJAI MURASU (P.) LTD.
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.147(b) Esculent of Income

---Reassessment---Information that income had escaped assessment---Information can be gathered from material, relating to subsequent years---Assessee publishing newspaper---Wastage of newsprint found to the excessive on comparison with Read More...


2001 PTD 690
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 SHER SINGH (HUF)
VS
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 27 Acquisition of land by Government

Net wealth/ Acquisition of land by Government/ Right to receive compensation/ Value of right to receive compensation on date alone includible in assessee”s net wealth/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957.

Reference/ Appeal to Appellate Tribunal/ Additional Read More...


2001 PTD 2249
247 ITR 103
Madras High Court (India) 2001 SOUTH INDIA CORPORATION AGENCIES (P.) LTD.
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.40A & 147. Failure to disclose material facts

---Reassessment---Failure to disclose material facts necessary for assessment---Company---Failure to give full details of expenses which could be disallowed under S.40A(5)---Reassessment proceedings were valid---Indian Income Tax ACT, Read More...


2001 PTD 693
Supreme Court of India 2001 K. GOVINDAN & SONS
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 139 & 147 Return/ Interest/ Reassessment/ Delay in filing returns

Return/ Interest/ Reassessment/ Delay in filing returns/ Meaning of “regular assessment”/ Assessment made for first time under S.147 is a regular assessment/ Interest under S.139(8) could be levied in case of such an assessment/ Indian Income Tax Act, Read More...


2001 PTD 2258
247 ITR 192
Gauhati High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
JOHN FOWLER (INDIA) LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 Income from undisclosed sources

---Income from undisclosed sources---Reference---Finding that particular amount did not constitute income from undisclosed sources---Finding of fact---Tribunal justified in deleting amount from income---Indian Income Tax Act, Read More...


2001 PTD 700
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
ATTUR THULUVA VELLALAR SANGAM
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 5(1)(i) Charitable trust/ Trust need not be wholly and exclusively engaged in charitable activity

Exemption/ Charitable trust/ Trust need not be wholly and exclusively engaged in charitable activity/ Sufficient if primary object of trust is charitable/ Trust having as its main object imparting of education and other objects of general public utility/ Collection Read More...


2001 PTD 1898
243 ITR 774
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.254 Tribunal

---Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Powers of Tribunal---Tribunal has power to admit addition ground of appeal---Tribunal has power to remand matter ITO-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.254.

Held, that Read More...


2001 PTD 708
Madras High Court (India) 2001 GANDHI TRADING
VS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.281B attachment of property

---Provisional attachment of property---Provisional attachment of property during pendency of assessment proceedings---Condition precedent for provisional attachment---Sufficient material on record to show that assessee would dispose of Read More...


2001 PTD 711
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
PUNJAB AND SINDH BANK LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.18. Interest on securities

---Interest on securities---Assessability---Interest on securities assessable on due basis---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.18.

On a bare reading of section 18 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, it is clear Read More...


2001 PTD 717
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
PADMAVATI RAJE COTTON MILLS LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.18. Business expenditure

---Business expenditure---Payment of market fees to Market Committee---Payment exceeding Rs.2,500 by cash disallowed by ITO---Miscellaneous application by assessee before Tribunal enclosing letter from Market Committee that committee not Read More...


2001 PTD 720
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
PADMAVATI RAJE COTTON MILLS LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.18 interest

The Income-tax Officer had also disallowed a sum of Rs.41,666 representing provision made for liability for interest payable to the Haryana Government on arrears of purchase tax by invoking section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. But Read More...


2001 PTD 720
Gujarat High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
SUHASHBHAI VADILAL
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.45 & 48. Sale of shares

---Capital gains---Sale of shares---Computation of capital gains---Deduction of costs of acquisition of shares---Shares held in a company---Sales of entire unit of company located in Bombay to a new company formed by it---Shareholders of Read More...


2001 PTD 725
Karnataka High Court (India) 2001 K. L. SWAMY
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 271(1)( c ) & 273A Concealment of income

Penalty---Concealment of income---- Waiver of reduction of penalty --- Condition precedent ---- Disclosure by filing return voluntarily and in good faith --- Meaning of expression “voluntarily and in good faith”--- Finding Read More...


2001 PTD 735
Karnataka High Court (India) 2001 K. L. SWAMY
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 271(1)(c) & 273A. Penalty

Penalty---Concealment of income---- Waiver of reduction of penalty --- Condition precedent ---- Disclosure by filing return voluntarily and in good faith --- Meaning of expression “voluntarily and in good faith”--- Finding Read More...


2001 PTD 735
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 null
VS
null
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) null Casual

Casual income---Word “casual”---Connotation---Assessee was Director-employee of a company and certain amount of loan advanced to him during his service with the company was waived by the employer company at the time of Read More...


2001 PTD 1047
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2001 null
VS
null
Finance Act, 1991 12, I2(12)(d), 12(1) Fixed Assets

---S.12---Corporate Assets Tax---Levy---Validity---Fixed assets---Meaning---“Work in progress” being full covered by the term “fixed assets” as used in S.12(12)(d), Finance Act, 1991 was chargeable to capital assets, tax under S.12(1) read Read More...


2001 PTD 1052
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 null
VS
null
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 5(1), 13(2), 66A, 5(a)(c)(cc), 13 Unexplained Investment

---Ss.13(2), 5(1) & 66-A---Unexplained investment---Newly-acquired assets by assessee---Failure of assessee to file objection when required by the Assessing Officer---Effect---Enhancement of income of assessee by Assessing Read More...


2001 PTD 1059
Madras High Court (India) 2001 V.T. VENKATESWARAN
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(1), 2(m)(iii) Unexplained investment

---Deductions---Wealth Tax liability as finally assessed is deductible---Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The assessee is entitled to claim for deduction of the wealth tax liability as finally assessed or determined by the Wealth Tax Read More...


2001 PTD 1064
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
L. BUSAPPA KUMAR
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 2, 2(IA), 45, 256 Unexplained investment

---Reference---Capital gains---Transfer of agricultural lands---Law applicable---Effect of amendment of S.2(1A) with retrospective effect from 1-4-1970—Question whether capital gains could be levied on gains arising on transfer of Read More...


2001 PTD 1066
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
MAHENDRA MILLS and 2 Others
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 28, 29, 32, 34 Unexplained investment

---Depreciation---Assessee not claiming Read More...


2001 PTD 1068
Bombay High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
KESAR SUGAR WORKS LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Accrual of income

---Income---Accrual of income---Sugar industry----On a writ, High Court by interim order allowing assesse to realise price in excess of levy price fixed by Government----Dispute regarding price---Amount realized by assesse in excess of Read More...


2001 PTD 743
Bombay High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
KESAR SUGAR WORKS LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 Interest

----Business expenditure---Interest—Sugar industry---Price realised in excess of levy price fixed by Government—High Court directing refund excess with interest at the rate of 12 per cent. Per annum—Liability to pay Read More...


2001 PTD 743
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 H. H. MAHARAJA MARTAND SINGH JUDEO
VS
H. H. MAHARAJA MARTAND SINGH JUDEO
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 Interest (money)

----Business expenditure---Interest---Money borrowed for paying income-tax---Interest on money borrowed is not deductible---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37.
Interest on money borrowed for payment of income-tax is not an expenditure Read More...


2001 PTD 749
Bombay High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
SHARDA SUGAR INDUSTRIES LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 Accrual of income

----Income---Accrual of income---Sugar industry---On a writ, High Court interim order allowing assesse to realise price in excess of levy price fixe by Government---Dispute regarding price---Amount realized by assesse excess of levy Read More...


2001 PTD 750
Supreme Court of India 2001 S.S.M. BROTHERS (P.) LTD. AND OTHERS
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 33, 33(1)(b)(B)(i); Sched. V, Unexplained investment

---Development rebate---Textile machinery---Machinery used for production of textile “including those otherwise processed”---Machinery used at any stage of production eligible for higher rebate---Assessee purchasing cloth and Read More...


2001 PTD 1103
Bombay High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
SHARDA SUGAR INDUSTRIES LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.8 Accrual of income

--S.8---Power of Central Board of Revenue—Scope---Central Board of Revenue can only issue clarification and is not empowered to give any meanings to any provisions of the statute through its own interpretation.

Read More...


2001 PTD 750
Bombay High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
SHARDA SUGAR INDUSTRIES LTD.
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.52 Deduction of tax at source

Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)---
---S.52 [as amended by Finance Act (IV of 1999), S.50(4)---Deduction of tax at source---Liability of persons failing to deduct or pay tax-----Interpretation of S.52 of the Income Read More...


2001 PTD 750
Lahore High Court 2001 MESSRS NASEER MUGHIS LTD., LAHORE
VS
C.I.T., LAHORE ZONE, LAHORE
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 23, 23A, 23D, 23(2), 23(1) dividend or bonus

---S. 23 A---Assessment—Undistributed dividend or bonus---Double taxation---Income-tax Authorities imposed tax on the assesse-company on the basis of undistributed profit as income under the provisions of S.23A of Income-Tax Act, Read More...


2001 PTD 772
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PESHAWAR
VS
MESSRS GUL COOKING OIL AND VEGETABLE GHEE (PVT.) LTD, AND OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.50(5), 56 & 63 Accrual of income

---Ss.50(5), 56 & 63---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts. 185(3) & 247—Notification No. S.R.O. 593(1)/91, Dated 30-6-1991—Advance income-tax exemption of---Deducting of such tax on the goods imported by assesse to Read More...


2001 PTD 778
Lahore High Court 2001 Messrs KHURRAM SAGHIR INDUSTRIES, LAHORE
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE A, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.13(1)(2) & 136(1) Approval

----Ss.13(1)(2) & 136(1)---Re-assessment---Requirement of prior approval---Object---Income-tax Authorities without prior separate approvals made assessments under Ss.13(1) & 13(2) of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Contention by the Read More...


2001 PTD 781
Karachi High Court 2001 MESSRS HABIB CREDIT & EXCHANGE BANK LIMITED
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.136 Capital Asset

---S.136---Banking Companies Ordinance (LVII of 1962), S.13---Appeal to High Court---Banking company---Question of treatment given by the department to the money acquired by Banking company from surrender/sale of Federal Investment Bonds Read More...


2001 PTD 785
Lahore High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES, LAHORE
VS
Messrs AL-GHAZI TRACTOR LIMITED, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Warranty Commission

---Warranty Commission---Unexpired warranty commission---Not a revenue receipt---Principles.
The assesse-respondent was a public limited company and was engaged in the assembly and sale of the tractors. For the assessment year 1984-85 Read More...


2001 PTD 789
Karachi High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Penal interest

---Deduction---Penal Read More...


2001 PTD 793
Peshawar High Court 2001 MUHAMMAD HANIF AND 21 OTHERS
VS
GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND 4 OTHERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.16 & 19 Effect/ retrospectively

---Ss.16 & 19 [as amended by Finance Act (IX of 1996)]---Notification No.C-1/167-1/ITP/86, dated, 16-7-1996--- imposition of tax---Explanation added to S.19, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 did not speak of its applicability with Read More...


2001 PTD 795
Lahore High Court 2001 MESSRS MIAN MUHAMMAD ASLAM
VS
C.I.T., LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2(24), 27, 27(2)(a)(ii), 13, 136, 151 Capital gain

---Ss. 27, 151 & 2(24)---Capital gain---Exemption---Sale of land by Company---Share of Director/shareholder of the Company in the sale proceeds of land of assesse-Company----Taxability----“Income” as defined in S.2(24), Read More...


2001 PTD 1222
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
P.M. ITOOP
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Schedule III Valuation of property

----Valuation of residential house----Method of valuation----Law applicable---Schedule III to Wealth Tax Act introduced with  effect from 1-4-1989---Amended provisions applicable to all pending  proceedings--- wealth Tax Act, Read More...


2001 P T D 1228
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
J. ABDUL KHADER SAIT AND ONOTHER
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 null

---Valuation of assets---Valuation of land with buildings thereon---Yield or rental method of valuation is proper---Value cannot be enhanced by adding reversionary value of land---Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957. In valuing lands with Read More...


2001 P T D 1230
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
D. KRISHNA MURTHY
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 7(4) Valuation of assets

----Valuation of assets---land belonging to HUF----Building on land belonging to Karta of HUF in individual capacity---Building used by HUF as residential house---Section 7(4) applicable for valuation purposes---Land and building to be Read More...


2001 P T D 1233
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
KARNAL COOPERATIVE SUGAR MILLS LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 null Income of capital

---Income of capital---Amounts deposited to open letter of credit for purchase of machinery required for setting up plant----Interest on such amount is directly connected and incidental to construction of plant---Interest was a capital Read More...


2001 P T D 1236
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
CADILA CHEMICALS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 40A, 40A(5), 256 Business expenditure

----Reference---Business expenditure---Company---Disallowance of expenditure---Amount paid as premium for purchase of deferred annuity policies in respect of Managing Director----Whether allowable---Question of law---Indian Income Tax Read More...


2001 P T D 1238
Supreme Court of India 2001 ALANKAR COMMERCIAL (PVT.) LTD
VS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX AND OTHERS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 4, 148 Charge of tax

---Charge of tax---Income accruing of arising in India is chargeable to tax under Income-tax Act----Company having its registered office in Sikkim---Notice under S.148 in respect of.income accruing or arising in India to such Read More...


2001 P T D 1240
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
INDIAN LEAF SPRING MANUFACTURING (P.) LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 40A, 40A(5), 40(c), 256 Perquisites to directors and employees

----Reference---Business expenditure---Company---Disallowance of expenditure---Perquisites to directors and employees---Insurance permia paid by company on behalf of employee-director---Whether could be disallowed under S. 40A(5) for Read More...


2001 P T D 1241
Lahore High Court 2001 MESSRS SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED, AVARI PLAZA, HILTON HOTEL, SHAHRAH-E-QUAID-E-AZAM, LAHORE
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 10 Capital expenditure

----Capital expenditure---Determination---Requirements---Assessee engaged in the business of transmission and distribution of gas had paid certain amount to the Provincial Irrigation Department for additional protective work built on Read More...


2001 PTD 798
Lahore High Court 2001 Mrs. ISMAT KAMAL
VS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX/WEALTH TAX CIRCLE-II, ZONE-C, LAHORE and 2 others
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) S. 31-B Self assessment

  ---S. 31-B---C.B.R. Circular No.5 of 1994, dated 19-9-1994---Additional wealth tax---levy of additional wealth tax was not mandatory---Value of rented out house was declared by the assesse on the basis of Annual Rental Value after Read More...


2001 PTD 807
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 C.I.T., CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE
VS
NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE CO. LTD., LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S. 59 Self assessment

---S. 59---C.B.R. Circular No.4 of 1996, dated 1-7-1996 C.B.R. Circular No.16 of 1996, dated 3-9-1996---C.B.R. Letter C. No. 7(27)/S.Asstt./96, dated 2-6-1996---Self assessment---“Broad-based Self-Assessment Scheme” for Read More...


2001 PTD 811
Lahore High Court 2001 C.I.T., CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE
VS
NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE CO. LTD., LAHORE
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 Ss.2(7), 10(2), (7) & First Sched , R,6 provision or reserves

---Ss.2(7), 10(2), (7) & First Sched , R,6---Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979), Fourth Sched. , R.5(a) [as amended by Finance Ordinance (XXV of 1980)]---Deduction---Insurance business---“Provision of a reserve” as Read More...


2001 PTD 814
Lahore High Court 2001 C.I.T., CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE
VS
NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE CO. LTD., LAHORE
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 Amendment

Amendment brought about by Finance Act, 1980 was only prospective and that in case of pending assessments at the relevant time the Assessing Officer could not go beyond the provisions of rule 5 of the Fourth Schedule as originally made. Read More...


2001 PTD 814
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
BOMBAY BURMAH TRADING CORPORATION
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.40(a)(v) & 40(c) Remuneration to employees

----Business expenditure----Company---Ceiling on expenditure---Remuneration to employees---Remuneration for employment outside India not to be taken into account for purposes of computing ceiling---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More...


2001 PTD 818
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
BOMBAY BURMAH TRADING CORPORATION
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40(a)(v) & 40(c) weighted deduction

---Export markets development allowance---weighted deduction---Condition precedent---Not necessary that exports should be made directly from India---Expenditure Incurred on export of tea from East Africa to U.K---Entitled to weighted Read More...


2001 PTD 818
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 H.H. MAHARAJA MARTAND SINGH JU DEO
VS
WEALTH TAX OFFICER and another
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.17 Escapment of Income

Reassessment---Condition precedent---Reason to believe that wealth had Reassess escaped assessment---WTO must have material for such belief-Assessee submitting returns and giving details regarding foreign shares and stocks... Original Read More...


2001 PTD 822
Madras High Court (India) 2001 MKS. MOHD. ABOOBACKER SAHEB
VS
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.5(1)(xviii) award and reward

---Exemption---Award---Difference between award and reward---Reward received by a tax informer is not an award---Not entitled to exemption Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.5(1)(xviii).

There is a Read More...


2001 PTD 831
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
S.V. SIVARATHINA PANDIAN
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 25(2), 16A Revision

---Revision---Powers of CWT---Meaning of “Record” for purposes of revision---Record includes material available at time of examination by Valuation Officer Under S.16A---Report of Valuation Officer received after completion Read More...


2001 PTD 855
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
B. CHANDRASEKHARA RAO
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 R.2 Minor

Exemption---House property---Firm---Minor---Minor admitted to benefits of partnership---House property owned by firm---Minor entitled to exemption under S.5(1)(iv) in respect of his share in such house property--- Indian Wealth Tax Act, Read More...


2001 PTD 835
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
M.V. ARUNACHALAM and another
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 R. 1D. Valuation of assets

Valuation of assets---Valuation of unquoted equity shares---Deductions--- Liability towards sales tax penalty---Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal modifying order of penalty subsequent to valuation date---Subsequent order must be taken into Read More...


2001 PTD 843
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
M.V. ARUNACHALAM and another
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 R. 1D Valuation of property

Valuation of property--Reference to Valuation Officer---Valuation requested for a number of assessment years---Completion of assessment for one of assessment years before valuation report was received---Valuation was not Read More...


2001 PTD 843
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX WEALTH TAX
VS
V. RANGNATHAM CHETTY
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Trustee

----Representative assessee---Trustee---Assessee sole surviving trustee endowed with all rights over properties---Rights given to assessee modified by supplementary deed confining right to assessee to first floor of property---Assessee Read More...


2001 PTD 857
Lahore High Court 2001 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RAWALPINDI
VS
MESSRS AMANAT ALI
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Reopening of assessment

----Ss. 65, 59(1) & 13(1)(b)---Reopening of assessment--- Scope and extent---Self Assessment  Scheme---Unexplained investment---Once the assessment was re-opened under s.65, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 on one specific- issue, the Read More...


2001 PTD 860
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 Shahbaz Butt
VS
Mrs. Talat Altaf, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66, 6, 80, (126-D) & S.66-A, 80-D Representative assessee

S.6--Exemption---Applicability---Question whether the case was covered under S.6 of the Economic Reforms Act, 1992 was a question of fact, which required appreciation of the facts and circumstances of the Read More...


2001 PTD (Trib.) 865
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 Shahbaz Butt
VS
Mrs. Talat Altaf, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66, 6, 80, (126-D) & S.66-A, 80-D Interpretation of statutes

Preamble---Preamble could be used in aid of the interpretation but if the main provision was clear in its application, Preamble was not to be read in as a part of the same---Preamble was not a part of statute and while interpreting a Read More...


2001 PTD (Trib.) 865
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 Shahbaz Butt
VS
Talat Altaf
Protection of Economic Reforms Act (XII of 1992) 6, (126)-D, 14, Protection of Economic Reforms

S.6---Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979), Second Sched., Part I, cl. (126-D)---Exemption---Words used "otherwise notified" in S.6 of the Protection of Economic Reforms Act, 1992--Connotation---Section 6 of the Economic Reforms Act, 1992 Read More...


2001 PTD (Trib.) 865
Lahore High Court 2001 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE
VS
MESSRS CRESCENT TEXTILE MILLS LTD., LAHORE
Income-tax Act (XI of 1922) Protection of Economic Reforms

S.65-Income-tax Act (XI of 1922), S.34---Re-opening of assessment under S.65, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Limitation---Extended time of limitation after enforcement of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 under $65 could not be made Read More...


2001 PTD 874
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2001 Iqbal Khawaja
VS
Mian Manawar Ghafoor, D.R.
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50 Securities

---“Securities”---Meaning---Term “securities” means and includes such documents which company issued in recognition of one”s share in business and assets of the company which entitled the securities holders Read More...


2001 P T D (Trib.) 876
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
B.D. GOENKA
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Determination of status

---Ss.2(16)(c), 2(30) & 2(40)(c)---Company---Non-resident or resident—Determination of status—Company/assesse was registered in U.S.A.—Branch Office in Pakistan claimed “resident status” being permanent Read More...


2001 PTD (Trib.) 888
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
B.D. GOENKA
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.12(5)(a) Income deemed to accrue or arise in Pakistan

---S.12(5)(a)---Income deemed to accrue or arise in Pakistan---Fee for technical services---Fiction of place---Fees paid to non-resident were deemed to accrue or arise in Pakistan under S.12(5)(a)of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 if technical services were utilized Read More...


2001 PTD (Trib.) 888
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
B.D. GOENKA
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.80-AA, 12(5)(a), 30(2)(b), 22 & 62 Avoidance of Double Taxation

Ss.80-AA, 12(5)(a), 30(2)(b), 22 & 62---C.B.R. Circular No.2(3)IT/2, dated 20-11-1982---Convention between Government of Pakistan and Government of U.S.A. for Avoidance of Double Taxation, Arts. II(1), III(1). & III(3)---Tax on Read More...


2001 PTD (Trib.) 888
Lahore High Court 2001 THE COMMISSIONER OF-INCOME-TAX, LAHORE
VS
MESSRS IMMION INTERNATIONAL, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Reference to High Court

S.136--Reference to High Court---Purpose and scope---Where the answer to a question is applicable to a certain assessee only in a particular year and is not of general application, a reference to the High Court need not be Read More...


2001 PTD 900
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
B.D. GOENKA
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Additions

---Net wealth---Assessee, partner in firm---Additions made to book profit of firm in assessment proceedings under Income-tax Act on account of exploitation of customs clearance certificates---Share of assessee in income derived by firm Read More...


2001 PTD 906
Kerala High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
M.K. ABDUL KHADER HAJI
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.5 Exemption

---Exemption---Moneys and assets brought by Indian citizen ordinarily residing abroad who returns with intention of residing in India permanently---Law applicable---Effect of amendment of S.5(1)(xxxiii) w.e.f. 1-4-1987---Remittances made Read More...


2001 PTD 908
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
HARIBHAI ESTATE (PVT.) LTD
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.5 Interest on fixed deposits

---Reference---Business---Other sources---Interest---Interest on fixed deposits, temporary loans and arrears of sales deposit---Whether income from business or from other sources---Question of law---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.28, 56 Read More...


2001 PTD 915
Kerala High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
KIKABIs EDUCATIONAL TRUST
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.11 & 13 Charitable trust

---Charitable purposes---Charitable trust---Exemptions---Denial of exemption where trust funds are diverted for benefit of persons mentioned in S.13---Educational trust---Trustees partners in firms---irrevocably assigning share income Read More...


2001 PTD 917
Supreme Court of India 2001 EIMCO K.C.P. LTD.
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37, 37(1) Business expenditure

---Business expenditure---General Principles---Capital or Revenue expenditure---Technical know-how---New company floated by Indian company and foreign company giving its technical now-how and obtaining equity shares in new company---Amount attributable to technical Read More...


2001 PTD 918
Supreme Court of India 2001 RAJASTHAN STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Heads of income

---Heads of income-General principles relating to deduction under various heads of income---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961.

The following principles may be laid down; (i) of the income of an assessee is Read More...


2001 PTD 925
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
A.R. BALARAMAN and another
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 5(1)(xxxii) Exemption

---Exemption---Firm---Partner---Industrial undertaking---Condition precedent---Manufacture of article---Firm purchasing silk yarn and getting cloth manufactured by weavers who on their own machines wove the material supplied by Read More...


2001 PTD 931
Supreme Court of India 2001 TRUSTEES OF H.E.H. THE NIZAMs SUPPLEMENTAL FAMILY TRUST
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 143, 147 & 237 Reassessment/ Refund

---Reassessment---Assessment---Return---Refund---Return filed alongwith application for refund is a valid return---Reassessment proceedings cannot be initiated so long as assessment proceedings are not terminated---Application for refund Read More...


2001 PTD 933
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
K. SITALAKSHMI
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Charge of tax/ Minor

---Charge of tax---Minor---Trust created for benefit of minor---Income of trust to be accumulated and handed over to minor on her attaining majority---Income from trust held not to be assessable in the hands of minor in Income-tax Read More...


2001 PTD 944
Supreme Court of India 2001 V.M. SALGOCAR & BROS. (PVT.) LTD AND OTHERS
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.11 & 13. Loan to the employee

When an appeal is dismissed by the Supreme Court by a non-speaking order, the order of the High Court or the Tribunal from which the appeal arose, merges with that of the Supreme Court. In such a case, the Supreme Court upholds the Read More...


2001 PTD 946
Supreme Court of India 2001 V.M. SALGOCAR & BROS. (PVT.) LTD AND OTHERS
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 17, 17(2) & 40A(5), 40A interest

For the assessment year 1979-80, the Income-tax Officer found that the assessee, which was a company, was borrowing large sums by paying interest at 15 per cent. per annum. This interest was claimed by the assessee as deductible Read More...


2001 PTD 946
Supreme Court of India 2001 V.M. SALGOCAR & BROS. (PVT.) LTD AND OTHERS
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 17, 17(2) & 40A(5), 40A interest

In assessments of a director of the same company, for the assessment years 1980-81 and 1981-82, the Income-tax Officer held that non-charging of interest on his debit balance with the company would amount to a perquisite in the hands of Read More...


2001 PTD 946
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
D.L.F. UNITED
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 Appellate Tribunal

---Reference---Finding of fact---Scope of jurisdiction of High Court---Appellate Tribunal is the final fact-finding Authority---High Court had no power to reconsider evidence and arrive at a conclusion contrary to that of the Tribunal---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More...


2001 PTD 968
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
D.L.F. UNITED
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 143, 271 High Court

---Assessment---Tribunal considering evidence and holding certain amounts to the income of the assessee---Assessment was valid---High Court had no power to reconsider evidence and hold at amounts did not form part of the assessee-s Read More...


2001 PTD 968
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
D.L.F. UNITED
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.256 & 271 penalty orders

---Penalty---Concealment of income---Tribunal upholding additions to income in quantum proceedings and consequently confirming penalty---High Court reconsidering evidence and deleting additions to income and penalty---High Court was not Read More...


2001 PTD 968
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
V.M. SP. L.AR. ARUNACHALAM CHETTIAR
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss.11 & 13. Exemption

---Exemption---Firm---Partner entitled to exemption in respect of agricultural lands held by firm to extent of his share---Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.5(1)(iv).

Held, that the assessee who was a Read More...


2001 PTD 972
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
V.M. SP. L.AR. ARUNACHALAM CHETTIAR
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 5(IA), 27(1) Appellate Tribunal

---Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Powers of Tribunal---Tribunal can allow new ground to be raised before it---Question regarding valuation of property---Tribunal was justified in allowing Revenue to raise question whether property in Read More...


2001 PTD 972
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
M. K. CHANDRAKANTH
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(1), 4(1)(a) Net wealth

---Net wealth---Inclusions in net wealth---Assets transferred to minor child---Trust for benefit of minor child---Trust held irrevocable by High Court---Contributions to trust were not includible in net wealth of assessee---Indian Wealth Read More...


2001 PTD 978
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
SUNDARAM SPINNING MILLS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.24 Depreciation

---Depreciation---Initial depreciation---Higher rate of initial depreciation---Manufacture of textiles---Effect of Entry of Entry 21 of Ninth Sched.---Textiles would include yearn---Manufacture of yearn entitled to higher rate of initial Read More...


2001 PTD 980
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
GOSLINO MARIO AND OTHERS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 9 Income deemed to accrue

---Income deemed to accrue or arise in India---Salary and allowances of foreign technician---Law applicable---Explanation to S.9(1)(ii) applicable only from 1-4-1979---Salary and allowances paid by Indian company to Italian concern for Read More...


2001 PTD 985
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 null
VS
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) sufficient cause

---Appeal---Limitation---Delay in filing appeal---Condonation of delay---Sufficient cause---Determination---Principles---Plea of “rush of work” for condonation of delay by no stretch of imagination was a “sufficient Read More...


2001 PTD 1040
Lahore High Court 2001 TANVIR ELAHI, DIRECTOR, ELAHI ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE
VS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-13, COMPANIES ZONE-II LAHORE and 2 others
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Bank

---Ss.80-B read with First Sched., Part I, 50(2-A) & 30---Income from dividends and Bank deposits---Interpretation and scope of S.80-B of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Assessee, an individual derived income from salary and Read More...


2001 PTD 1032
Karachi High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
NATIONAL REFINERY LTD
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 80 CC , 50(SA) Rectification of mistake

---Ss.80CC & 50(5A)---C.B.R. Circular No.14 of 1993, dated 19-8-1993---Tax on certain exporters---Assessee/exporter cannot be charged to tax under S.80CC of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 once the assessee/exporter establishes that Read More...


2001 PTD 1030
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001
VS
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 35, 30 Rectification of mistake

Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)---Ss.156, 35 & 30---Rectification of mistake---Carry forward of business loss---Income from other sources---Interest income---Business income---Business loss---Carried forward---Set off against Read More...


2001 PTD (Trib.) 1017
Karachi High Court 2001 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
MESSRS DURATHENE MANUFACTURERS
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Affidavit

---Ss.131, 148 & 158---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts.129, illus. (e) & 1(2)---Appeal -Affidavit filed by the assessee assailing the consent assessment-----Provision of S.131, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 being mandatory in Read More...


2001 PTD 1002
Bombay High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
TRADE WINGS LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 40(c), 40A(5) Ceiling on Expenditure

Business expenditure---Company---Ceiling on expenditure---Expenditure resulting in remuneration, amenity or benefit to employee or Director---Scope of Ss.40(c) & 40A(5)---Expenditure should result in remuneration amenity or benefit to employee or Director in his Read More...


2001 PTD 1666
Karachi High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
SHIRAZI INVESTMENT
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 131, 136 fresh evidence/materia

---Ss. 136 & 131---Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Procedure---New or fresh evidence/material was not permissible to the brought on the record by the Appellate Tribunal at the stage of Second Appeal.Memoona Ahmed v. The A.C.I.T. 1998 Read More...


2001 PTD 999
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 Muhammad Iqbal Hashmi
VS
Sajjad Ali, D.R.
null null Gross profit rate

---Gross profit rate---Assessee, a manufacturer of ghee, cooking oil and soap---Declaration of loss by the assessee---Assessing Officer Applied 4% gross profit rate against the 5.81% and 3.82% declared rate for the previous Read More...


2001 PTD 994
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 Muhammad Iqbal Hashmi
VS
Sajjad Ali, D.R.
null null declared sale

---Loss---Closure of business on account of loss---Declaration of sale for six months only---Addition---Addition was made by making comparison with the previous years---Validity---Assessing Officer was directed by the Tribunal to accept Read More...


2001 PTD 994
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 Muhammad Iqbal Hashmi
VS
Sajjad Ali, D.R.
null null Different sale rate

---Trading account---Defective accounts---Different sale rate for different parties---Admissibility---Reduced sale rate for one party as compared to the other parties---Rejection of account was upheld by the Read More...


2001 PTD 994
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 Muhammad Iqbal Hashmi
VS
Sajjad Ali, D.R.
null null Declared Sale

---Sale---Considerable improvement in sale as declared in the previous years---Assessee showed considerable improvement in the declared sales than the last two years---Assessing Officer estimated the sales---Validity---Appellate Tribunal Read More...


2001 PTD 994
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan 2001 Muhammad Iqbal Hashmi
VS
Sajjad Ali, D.R.
null null Trading Account

---Trading account---Assessee, manufacturer of ghee and cooking oil etc.---Foreign exchange losses and leakage of material at customer;s store---Treatment---Principles---Charge of foreign exchange losses and leakage of goods at Read More...


2001 PTD 994
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
ORIENT PHARMA (P.) LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 40A(7)(a), 40A(7)(b), 40A(7)(b)(1), 40A(7)(b)(ii) Gratuity

----Business----expenditure---Disallowance---Gratuity---Conditions for allowance of provision for gratuity---Scope of S.40A(7)----No approved gratuity fund created in relevant previous year---No amount paid as gratuity during financial year----Deduction claimed not Read More...


2001 PTD 1672
Karachi High Court 2001 MEHRAN GIRLS COLLEGE
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Exemption

Exemption from income-tax was not allowed to the assessee by the Tribunal---Appeal to High Court---Finding of Income-tax Appellate Tribunal that assessee, a Girls College, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal cannot be sustained Read More...


2001 PTD 987
Karachi High Court 2001 MEHRAN GIRLS COLLEGE
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) . Assessment

---S.2(7)---Assessment---Assessment relating to each assessment year in an absolutely different and independent proceeding under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, which does not permit the findings of a particular assessment year to be Read More...


2001 PTD 987
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2001 Mansoor Ahmed, D.A. G./L.A. and Riaz Hussain Shah, D.R
VS
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 2(16)(bb), 2(32), 22, 23, 23(1), 23(1)(xii), 23(1)(xiii), 23(1)(xiv), 23(1)(xv), 23(1)(xviii), Second Sched. Welfare

---S. 2(16)(bb), (32) & First Sched., Part I, para (A)---Company---Trust---Army welfare Trust---Status---Army Welfare Trust was previously carrying name of Army Welfare Projects Fund which was registered under the Societies Read More...


2001 PTD 1243
Gujarat High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
KIRIT WOOD WORKS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 184, 185, 187, 188, 184(7), 184(8), 185(4) Continuation of Registration

Firm----Registration---Continuation of registration---Change in constitution of firm----Difference between dissolution of a firm and a change in its constitution---Application in Form No.11-A has to be filed in case of change in constitution of firm---Registration Read More...


2001 PTD 1675
Lahore High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE
VS
MESSRS INTERHOME IMPERIAL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, LAHORE
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 10, 10(2)(xvi) Allowable deduction

S.10(2) (xvi)--- Interpretation of S, 10(2)(xvi), Income-tax Act, 1922---

Provision of S. 10(2)(xvi) of the Act only prohibited claiming and allowing of an expenditure which was in the nature of Read More...


2001 PTD 1286
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
ANAND THEATRES AND OTHERS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32, 32(1)(v), 43, 43(3) Depreciation

(a) Income-tax---
---Depreciation---Nature of---Plant---Building---Two separate categories---Theatre building and hotel building specially equipped for purposes of business---Are still buildings---Not entitled to Read More...


2001 PTD 1288
Lahore High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, A-ZONE, LAHORE
VS
SOHAIL ASLAM, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 58, 108, 110, 136 Wealth Statement

Wealth Statement---Non-compliance of requirement of filing wealth statement---Penalty---Validity---Penalty under S. 108 , Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 for default in submitting wealth statement as required under S. 58 of the said advance Read More...


2001 PTD 1325
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
CARBORANDUM UNIVERSAL LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32, 37, 37(5) Guest House

Business expenditure---Depreciation---Guest house---Law applicable---Effect of introduction of subsection (5) of S.37 by Finance Act, 1983, with retrospective effect from 1-4-1979---Subsection (5) of S.37 by Finance Act, 1983, with retrospective effect from Read More...


2001 PTD 1685
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
HALAI MENON. ASSOCIATION
HALAI MENON. ASSOCIATION 3 Association of persons

Wealth Tax---Charge of tax---Individual---Association of persons not liable to wealth tax as individual under S. 3--- Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.3.

The expression “Individual” cannot Read More...


2001 PTD 1328
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 STEEL EXECUTIVES ASSOCIATION
VS
RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 15, 17, 17(2), 192 Salary

Salary---Perquisite—House rent---Accommodation provided by employer—Perquisite only if rent charged by employer is concessional---Employer constructing houses in a particular location and rent charged rationalized---No concessional rent when all Read More...


2001 PTD 1691
Lahore High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE. LAHORE
VS
TAUHEED ELAHI
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 34, 26 Casual gain

Hyderogenated Vegetable Oil Industry Act (Control and Development) Act (LXV of 1973), S. 26---Reference to High Court---Scope—Assessee, an individual had shares in a limited company running the business of oil which was taken over Read More...


2001 PTD 1329
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
INDIA CEMENTS LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37, 154, 348,349 Business Expenditure

Business expenditure----Expenditure incurred in violation of another statue is no deductible---- amount paid to managing agent by company in excess of ceiling allowed under S.248 read with S.349 of Companies Act----Amount paid in excess was not deductible---Indian Read More...


2001 PTD 1698
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
N. NAZEERUDEEN
Lottery Prize

Wealth-tax---Net Wealth Lottery prize Dispute regarding ownership of Lottery Prize pending before High Court Assessee allowed to draw one-half of amount by giving Bank guarantee pending litigation on condition that amount to be refunded Read More...


2001 PTD 1331
Lahore High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE-A, LAHORE
VS
ABU BAKAR MAQSOOD
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 13, 13(1)(d), 136 Purchase of property

Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) ---Ss. 136 & 13(1)(d) Reference to High Court Scope Purchase of property by assessee Estimation of value by the Revenue Authorities cancelled by the Tribunal Reasons which favoured with the Read More...


2001 PTD 1333
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
UNITED PROVINCES ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32, 32(1)(iii), Expln. (2), (IA), Expln., 41, 41(2)

Business Income Profits chargeable to tax Balancing charge When moneys payable “become due” Acquisition of electricity undertakings Compensation determined and paid by Government Moneys have become due Profits chargeable in Read More...


2001 PTD 1335
Lahore High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, FAISALABAD
VS
ABDUL JABBAR
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 111, 136 13(1)(aa) & Second Sched Individual member of an A.O.P

Reference to the High Court Scope Individual member of an A.O.P. had disclosed the source of income which was claimed to be exempted Assessing Officer on the basis of the fact that the source had been allowed only part of the income Read More...


2001 PTD 1348
Lahore High Court 2001 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, COMPANIES, LAHORE
VS
MESSRS PUNJAB FLOUR MILLING CORPORATION LTD., LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 10(29) Levy

Surcharge, Levy of Retained income Taxes payable could be treated as retained income for the purpose of levy of Read More...


2001 PTD 1409
Lahore High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, FAISALABAD
VS
ABDUL JABBAR
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 111, 136 13(1)(aa) & Second Sched Penalty

Concealment of income Penalty Claims as share of exempt income was made by the assessee which was finally accepted in appeal penalty for concealment Validity to prefer a claim for exemption of certain amount which was partially Read More...


2001 PTD 1348
Delhi High Court (India) 2001 DALMIA DAIRY INDUSTRIES LTD. (FORMERLY DALMIA CEMENT LTD)
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 Business Expenditure

Capital or revenue expenditure---Sale of factories in Pakistan---Sale consideration to be satisfied by export of cement----Cement not supplied---Litigation expenses for realising value of cement and interest thereon---Not deductible as business Read More...


2001 PTD 1706
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 18(1)(a), 15, 14(1), 17(1) Penalty

Wealth Tax: Penalty Failure to file returns in time HUF Finding in income tax assessment proceedings that a certain amount did not belong to HUG finding upheld by High Court penalty could not e levied for failure to file wealth tax Read More...


2001 PTD 1351
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
LAKSHMI MACHINE WORKS LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37, 37(2A) Business Expenditure

(a)Income-tax---
---Business expenditure---Accounting---Bonus---Mercantile system of accounting-----Amount paid as bonus in addition to that provided in accounts in pursuance of settlement with workers---Amount paid was deductible---Indian Income Read More...


2001 PTD 1712
Lahore High Court 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAWALPINDI ZONE; RAWALPINDI
VS
MESSRS HEAVY MECHANICAL COMPLEX LTD. TAXILA, DISTRICT RAWALPINDI
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 43 Plant

Depreciation “Plant” Connotation Word “plant” had much wider meaning when used in the context of factory “Plant” in its factual meaning included not only the main structure but also the ancillary ones Read More...


2001 PTD 1354
Madras High Court (India) 2001 SAKINABAI IBRAHIM & SONS
VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 147, 148 Reassessment

Income-tax---
---Reassessment---Income escaping assessment----Failure to furnish returns----Assessment under S.148 was valid---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.147.

Income-tax---
---Body of individuals---Muslim Read More...


2001 PTD 1717
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
M.P. NARAYANAN AND ANOTHER
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 271(1)(c), 68, 273A Penalty

(a) Income Tax
Penalty Concealment of income Firm agreeing to addition of cash credits in its income No evidence of concealment of income Application for waiver of penalty would not amount to admission of concealment penalty could not Read More...


2001 PTD 1356
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 Smt. SHASHI DEVI
VS
INCOMETAX OFFICER AND OTHERS
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 131, 131(1)(d) Disclosure of Income

Voluntary disclosure of income---Income-tax inquiry---Effect of voluntary disclosure of income---Voluntary disclosure does not preclude enquiry by department----Finding that amount disclosed as amount spent on construction of house property was not correct---Issue Read More...


2001 PTD 1725
Lahore High Court 2001 IQBAL POULTRY FARM, FAISALABAD
VS
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, FAISALABAD
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 136, 166 Reassessment

Reassessment Reference to High Court Scope High Court while expressing an opinion had to confine itself Read More...


2001 PTD 1366
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
SURESH CHANDRA MITTAL
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 271, 271(1), 271(1)(c) Concealment of income

Penalty / Concealment of income / Burden of proof / Initial burden on Revenue to prove concealment / Revised returns showing higher income / Returns accepted and assessment completed / Additional income offered to buy peace and avoid litigation / Explanation found Read More...


2001 PTD 1736
(2000)82 TAX 234
Allahabad High Court (India) 2001 Before M. C. Agarwal and S. Rafat Alam, JJ
VS
ASHOK KUMAR GOEL
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(1), 25(2), 2(m)(ii), 35 Proceedings

Revision Commissioner Notices under S. 25 by Commissioner in proceedings to revise assessment Mistake rectified by W.T.O himself under S. 35 of the Act prior to issue of S. 25 notice Rectification order later set aside A.A.C. on Read More...


2001 PTD 1383
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
PULLICAR MILLS LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Gratuity

Business expenditure / Gratuity / Incremental liability / Amount allowed by A.O. / Tribunal increasing deduction / No material no record to justify such increase / Amount increased not deductible / Indian Income Tax Act, 1961.

Held, that the Tribunal had Read More...


2001 PTD 1739
[(2000)82 TAX 358]
Lahore High Court 2001 MESSRS CRESCENT ART FABRICS (PVT.) LTD., LAHROE
VS
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES, LAHORE
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 13, 13(1)(d) Deemed income Addition

Deemed-income-Addition-Directors of assessee company had transferred the land to the company at cost and evident intention appeared to be the allotment of shares of its value to them assessee company had not yet started any business Read More...


2001 PTD 1386
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
BEST SUPPLY AGENCY
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 & 271 Concealment of income

Penalty / Concealment of income / Finding by Tribunal that there had been mistakes and that when mistakes were discovered the assessee had agreed to additions to its income / Finding of fact / Tribunal was correct in holding that there had been no concealment of Read More...


2001 PTD 1741
[(2000)82 TAX 296]
Allahabad High Court (India) 2001 TRILOK CHAND SETH
VS
UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 120, 263 Deemed income Addition

Revision-Commissioner-Scope of powers Effect of amendment of Explanation of S. 25 by Finance Act, 1988, with retrospective effect Valuation of business assets not dealt with by Appellate Authority no merger of order of Assessing Officer Read More...


2001 PTD 1390
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
21ST SOCIETY OF IMMACULATE CONCEPTION
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 11 & 13 Charitable trust

Charitable trust / Exemption / Nuns receiving salary as teachers in a school / Nuns making over all their earnings to society / Society incurring expenditure required for maintenance of Nuns / Salary minus their maintenance expenses was donation to society / Nuns Read More...


2001 PTD 1744
[(2000)82 TAX 251]
Kerala High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
P. GOPINATHA PILLA
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(3), 16A Valuation of Assets

Valuation of assets Reference to Valuation Officer Assessment year 1982-83 Accounting year ending 30-09-1981 Valuation report of Valuation Officer relating to position as on 30-09-1982 Valuation report not relevant for period ending on Read More...


2001 PTD 1398
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
N. GOPALSAMY
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 16(i) Standard deduction

Salary / Standard deduction / Salary income from two employers during accounting year / Two standard deduction are not permissible / Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.16(i).

The assessee gave up his job and joined another concern and hence during accounting Read More...


2001 PTD 1747
Calcutta High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS
P. P. GHOSH (through executrix Smt. Jayanti Ghosh)
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(1), 25 Marketing

Revision Meaning of “record” Valuation of immovable properties Valuation report of valuation Officer not available to W.T.O. at time of completion of assessment Report can be considered by CWT Revision under S. 25 justified Read More...


2001 PTD 1404
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
S.R. RATHI
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 260A Existence of substantial question of law

Appeal to High Court  / Competency of appeal / Existence of substantial question of law / Exemption / Gratuity / Leave encashment / Tribunal finding that assessee was fifty-eight year of age and was entitled to exemption under Ss. 10(10A) and 10(10AA) / Read More...


2001 PTD 1749
[241 I T R 190]
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS
GUJARAT STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION LTD
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 10(29) Marketing

Exemption Income of authority constituted for marketing of commodities, from letting out godowns or warehouses Interest income and other income of such authority, whether entitled to exemption Conflict of opinion in decisions of Supreme Court Indian Income Tax Act, Read More...


2001 PTD 1407
Supreme Court of India 2001 UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
VS
S. MUTHYAM REDDY
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.2 Agricultural income/ Capital gains

Capital gains / Agricultural income / Profits from sale of agricultural lands / Law applicable / Effect of insertion of Expln to S. 2(1A) with retrospective effect from 1-411970 / income arising from transfer of lands referred to in S.2(14)(iii)(a) or (b) cannot be Read More...


2001 PTD 1752
[(2000)82 TAX 37]
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
BHOORATNAM & CO
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32A, 154, 256 Levy

Reference---Rectification of mistakes--- In proceedings under S.154 whether Assessing Officer can verify which machinery was used for contract work Question of law Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 154 & 256 [CIT v. Bhooratnam & Read More...


2001 PTD 1410
Madras High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
KAMADHENU
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.40(b) Business expenditure/ Net interest paid by firm to partner to be considered for disallowance

Firm/ Business expenditure/ Disallowance/ Net interest paid by firm to partner to be considered for disallowance/ India Income Tax Act, 1961, S.40(b).

The assesse was firm carrying on textile business. A sum of Rs.11,859 was the interest payment made by the Read More...


2001 PTD 1759
[(2000)82 TAX 101]
[241 ITR 17]
Supreme Court of India 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS
TRUSTEES OF H.E.H. NIZAMS MISCELLANEOUS TRUST
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 19, 16(i), 57(i), 256 Income Trust

Reference Income Trust Assessment of trust Income from other sources Deductions Trust deed providing for remuneration to trustees Decision of High Court for assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73 that amount paid to trustees was diverted Read More...


2001 PTD 1412
Allahabad High Court (India) 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
BANARAS BRASS MERCHANT AND MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.11 Charitable purpose/ Trust for formation of trade and commerce

Charitable purpose/ Charitable trust/ Trust for formation of trade and commerce/ Finding by Tribunal that objects of trusts were for general public utility and that there was no activity for profit/ Trust entitled to exemption under S.11/ Indian Income Tax Act, Read More...


2001 PTD 1762
[(2000)82 TAX 120]